crossy said:Lately i have been struggling to keep form on bent over rows and was thinking of subbing them for Seated Row or Seated Cable Row what are the disadvantages of this if any?
Thanks Crossy
crossy said:i looked like a gorilla taking a shit,
). Reset the weight and work your way up again. crossy said:lol, ok ok i get it. I would not have moved from the lift without checking first that it would be less beneficial, that why i asked
Thanks for all the advice and as side note i did them tonight (bent over rows) and they felt fine a little movement in the last rep but it was a PR. I am gonne deload 7% or something round that next week.
Again thanks for all the comments![]()
crossy said:lol, ok ok i get it. I would not have moved from the lift without checking first that it would be less beneficial, that why i asked
Thanks for all the advice and as side note i did them tonight (bent over rows) and they felt fine a little movement in the last rep but it was a PR. I am gonne deload 7% or something round that next week.
Again thanks for all the comments![]()
Wouldn't do this either.....supporting the core is less efective than the barbell row.....if anything switch to ol school YMCA corner tbar rows or dbell rows for a week....or even alternate....I alternate barbell rows with deads....1968Charger said:you can also do this take 2 dumb bells and go over to a incline bench and lie on it on your stomach and pull the dumb bells up to your waist . it like doing rows but the bench supports you .its diffrent from bb rows ,but you will lose the core angle of the movment .
^^^JKurz1 said:Wouldn't do this either.....supporting the core is less efective than the barbell row.....if anything switch to ol school YMCA corner tbar rows or dbell rows for a week....or even alternate....I alternate barbell rows with deads....
1968Charger said:you can also do this take 2 dumb bells and go over to a incline bench and lie on it on your stomach and pull the dumb bells up to your waist . it like doing rows but the bench supports you .its diffrent from bb rows ,but you will lose the core angle of the movment .
works fine for me ,and deads/t bar rows can give you a bad back thats why most gyms dont have t bar rows any more its a lower back scrambler.,i cant do themJKurz1 said:Wouldn't do this either.....supporting the core is less efective than the barbell row.....if anything switch to ol school YMCA corner tbar rows or dbell rows for a week....or even alternate....I alternate barbell rows with deads....
JKurz1 said:Wouldn't do this either.....supporting the core is less efective than the barbell row.....if anything switch to ol school YMCA corner tbar rows or dbell rows for a week....or even alternate....I alternate barbell rows with deads....
like you have a back to talk "LOL"ricanx99 said:Yea yea! What he said!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
plus the idea of doing the old school corner t-bar rows or BB rows pendlay style is that it reduces the time that your lower back is supporting the weight anyway - this is because of deweighting every rep on the floor. low TUT if you willblut wump said:This is a bit of a chicken and egg situation. Deads and unsupported rowing can give you a bad back from having strengthened your back without having kept your core on a par. What happens then is that a trainee uses more weight than parts of the chain can tolerate and the weak link gets damaged.
If one incorporates free movements to keep the posterior chain worked throughout its length rather than spending time on isolation exercises from one's early training days, or is prepared to take the time to bring the core up to par, then deads and unsupported rowing will continue to be strengthening exercises that are completely safe when done with reasonable form.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














