There are many variations on a squat: high-bar olympic, PL-style, front squat, zercher, and so on.
All of these motions, to varying degrees boil down to a combination of two movements:
1. Knee extension
2. Hip extension
For instance, a PL-squat is skewed towards hip extension, resembling almost a GM at times. A close-stance front squat, by contrast, would diminish hip extension and recruit the quads more.
But what should become obvious is that the quads are only responsible for the first of those two movements, knee extension. The quads would see much more direct stress from a leg extension exercise because you cut out hip extension and isolate their function.
Yet I frequently see people insist (and used to insist myself) that squats should be the staple of any leg program. Why is this? Obviously it's not because of their ham and glute recruitment during hip extension; most of that is covered to a much better degree by some form of a deadlift. Also, the "safe" style of squatting generally advocates limiting the forward travel of the knees over the toes, thus shifting the movement towards hip extension and reducing the desired quad effect!
I'm doing a personal experiment: next HST cycle, leg extensions will be my only quad exercise. No squats, no leg presses, no hack squats, no combination of leg and hip extension, just pure leg extension. I expect my quads (a lagging bodypart btw) to explode.
I know everybody's a fan of squats and I would be lying if I said I didn't love them myself. But as a bodybuilder, each movement is only a means to the end of increased muscularity, and squats have failed to deliver.
So, what do you guys think? I'm looking to stimulate some hardcore discussion here.
All of these motions, to varying degrees boil down to a combination of two movements:
1. Knee extension
2. Hip extension
For instance, a PL-squat is skewed towards hip extension, resembling almost a GM at times. A close-stance front squat, by contrast, would diminish hip extension and recruit the quads more.
But what should become obvious is that the quads are only responsible for the first of those two movements, knee extension. The quads would see much more direct stress from a leg extension exercise because you cut out hip extension and isolate their function.
Yet I frequently see people insist (and used to insist myself) that squats should be the staple of any leg program. Why is this? Obviously it's not because of their ham and glute recruitment during hip extension; most of that is covered to a much better degree by some form of a deadlift. Also, the "safe" style of squatting generally advocates limiting the forward travel of the knees over the toes, thus shifting the movement towards hip extension and reducing the desired quad effect!
I'm doing a personal experiment: next HST cycle, leg extensions will be my only quad exercise. No squats, no leg presses, no hack squats, no combination of leg and hip extension, just pure leg extension. I expect my quads (a lagging bodypart btw) to explode.
I know everybody's a fan of squats and I would be lying if I said I didn't love them myself. But as a bodybuilder, each movement is only a means to the end of increased muscularity, and squats have failed to deliver.
So, what do you guys think? I'm looking to stimulate some hardcore discussion here.

Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










