Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Scammer

Status
Not open for further replies.
needtogetas said:
I dont undersand why they are getting on you for saying something about a fronting source.cant be annything rong with a source that would front.no way to get scamed.only thing I can think of that would be wrong with a source like that is it could be a cop or d.e.a or something trying to set you up.my ???? would be dose this type of source wont you to singn for the pack.so he "knows you got it"cuze then I would say fuck that.


It didnt have anything to do with that initially...He was wrong on the first issue (said chase152 was as GOOD SOLID SOURCE, and argued with me over THAT :rolleyes:...But we ALL know chase152 ISNT good:o)

So now he has turned it into this thing with the fronting...:o
OF COURSE there are sources who front (this is the 3rd time I have had to say that now), but that ISNT what started this whole issue...

It is pointless to argue with dosandojo as he thinks he knows everything and how the whole game works :rolleyes:

He's already proven himself a LIAR here a few times now, so I anticipate he will just lie some more from here on out :o
 
Then WHO keeps changing my links, words, etc.? And WHO (Terminator) went on this black out bombing attack because they did NOT like what they were hearing?????
 
It is YOU who are WRONG Termintor...When did I go on about Chase being such a SOLID source?? That was just you changing my words around! I NEVER argued that he was a GOLDEN and SOLID source! That was ALL in YOUR HEAD! I already told you , YOU MISCONSTRUED what I said, but you STILL want to stay stuck (AND BE WRONG) on thinking 'I' was going to bat for CHASE! NOT!!! I DONT even know ONE single thing about the guy, so WHY would I vouch for him?????????
 
WHY do you INSIST on being ANTAGONISTIC????????? WHY do you NEED to ARGUE????? WHAT are you lacking in your life, that you NEED to do these two things SO much????????
 
GOOD is NOT GOLDEN!!!...HUGE DIFFERENCE!!! He was a GOOD source, or RADAR would NOT have vouched for him!? RIGHT?? And his REP MUST have been GOOD (at the LEAST), for RADAR to have trusted him...RIGHT???? It is like 'I' am being blamed for something RADAR did!!!!!
 
Look, I am SORRY for insulting you...that was LOW and WRONG. I have tried to squash this with you...I will try AGAIN...I APOLOGIZE...maybe I just did NOT make myself clear enough...that is the problem with the net sometimes...what you MEAN, does NOT always translate to WRITE or SAY...Ok? I hope you accept. Peace...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom