Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Russell Crowe Cast as Superman!!!

The Whole F/N Show said:
I wouldn't say they change Bonds every 3-4 movies since Connery and Moore both did more than 4 Bond movies a piece. Timothy Dalton got the hook because he sucked and Pierce Bronsnan who was the orignal choice wasn't available.

thats the policy now though, its what brosnan keeps saying, this last movie is his last whether he wants to keep going or not.

they started the policy with dalton, i think as a result of lazenby only doing one
 
Really? I didn't no that. Timothy did suck as Bond, which for me is kinda said since my real name is Dalton. Now I think Russell Crowe is a bad ass he seems a little too Buff to play Bond. Maybe that's just me.
 
The Whole F/N Show said:
Really? I didn't no that. Timothy did suck as Bond, which for me is kinda said since my real name is Dalton. Now I think Russell Crowe is a bad ass he seems a little too Buff to play Bond. Maybe that's just me.

yeah, i think he;s a little to brazen. thats why i think he's unsuitable

bond was always ment to be a brazen thug but in a sheep in wolves clothing way:)
 
furious said:
damnit....that scared the Hades out of me. They need to cast someone who is 6'3 around 225-230 ripped to play Kal El.

I agree, with very dark hair too. Jolie would make a good Lois though.
 
Am I THE ONLY ONE who ever notices that HYUGE "thing" on Crowe's forehead? I mean, I think that gladiator was an excellent flick and Crowe was a great in it, but SHEESH! All the freaking money that guy makes and he can't get that "thing" removed? I found it to be VERY distracting and took away from my overall enjoyment of the movie-watching experience.

PS - I disagree with Jolie being cast as Lois Lane. She is just way to "slutty-looking" (not a cheap shot at Jolie) and would be miscast. Someone more like Teri Hatcher (UGH! What happened to her?!) would be better suited I feel.
 
danielson said:


thats the policy now though, its what brosnan keeps saying, this last movie is his last whether he wants to keep going or not.

they started the policy with dalton, i think as a result of lazenby only doing one

Untrue. Brosnan is signed on for two more, that'll make five for him. He may do more, but age could catch up with him since he started the role later in life. Dalton was yanked because no one liked him as Bond and no one went to see his movies. There is no "limit" to the number of Bond pictures an actor can do if he's popular and young enough.
 
I still think they should go with christopher reeves. that would be great. every feel good liberal out there would be like "wow, what a good movie...it gives disabled children so much hope...i havent even seen the movie yet, but it deserves an oscar...what a great idea...sheer brilliance."
 
Top Bottom