Plunkey ... plz explain

[jnevin]

http://cdn04.cdnwp.thefrisky.com/wp...icheal-jackson-eating-popcorn-theater-gif.gif

 

[75th]

For those watching for entertainment purposes:

I conveniently changed Plunkey's top criteria from only public spending to total spending (public + mandatory private. Makes sense for anybody who knows anything).

I also took the liberty of comparing Ireland to two EU countries who are in vastly superior economic shape. OMG ITS THEIR HIGH SOCIAL SPENDING THATS CAUSING ALL THEIR PROBLEMS!!!!@#@#@#!!

 

[75th]

That sound you just heard was all the microphones around the world dropping all at once.

 

[PICK3]

That sound you just heard was all the microphones around the world dropping all at once.

I heard dick

 

[mrplunkey]

ooloolollolololollool

I gotta hand it to you - I was feeding my son his nightly bottle when I read your reply with your link and HE spit out his milk.

Ok, pay attention as the following lesson will rival the one where you learned that how 3 people are dressed in the lobby of an airport Sheraton is under no circumstances an accurate barometer of the economy of an entire country.

You're not too bright, so lets start this lesson with two yes or no questions:

1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.

Hint: No

2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.

Hint: No.

No wonder you make your living selling x-ray machines. Please dont bother even trying to discuss anything related to finance anymore. You simply embarrass yourself.

Just own-up to the fact that you hitched your cart to a retarded horse without checking facts. Face it, you fucked up. Now move on.

Do you remember this exchange?

Delicious irony considering how you're wrong about pretty much everything.

Well you certainly aren't man enough to admit you're wrong. There's no point in even asking you.

orly?

Here's your chance to take the consolation prize. Just admit you jumped too soon and move on. Think of the upside -- you'll have proven me wrong on my statement about you never admitting you're wrong. Isn't that worth something?

 

[75th]

I bet.

The best part is I can literally feel plunkey bending over backwards trying to come up with a way to spin this.

Inb4 changing the subject.

 

[75th]

Inb4 changing the subject.

Here's your chance to take the consolation prize. Just admit you jumped too soon and move on. Think of the upside -- you'll have proven me wrong on my statement about you never admitting you're wrong. Isn't that worth something?

loolololllloololollo right on time!

 

[75th]

Lets see:

Hasnt answered two simple questions.

Ignored facts posted up for him to review.

Trying to change the subject.

It's our China conversation all over again. I love how things never change much around here.

 

[PICK3]

http://www.factcheck.org/

 

[mrplunkey]

Watching you squirm on the hook is entertaining to me.

I wonder if you'll jump on the RedScam(TM) bandwagon so quickly next time.

In a weird way, I think you might.