Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
It would be awesome if we could somehow plug all of plunkeys bullshit into that website. Total. Internet. Meltdown.
Plunkey ... plz explain
- Thread starter PICK3
- Start date
It would be awesome if we could somehow plug all of plunkeys bullshit into that website. Total. Internet. Meltdown.
Changing the subject.
Not answering the question.
Ignoring facts.
Here...just in case you glossed over it:
Thoughts?
Because I have some free time, Ill add a few more questions in:
How would you compare the financial strength and economic stability of Ireland vs Germany? What about vs Austria?
Looking at the above chart (Ill paste it again below for your review), wouldnt you agree that there is strong evidence that there is not a direct correlation between total social spending as a % of GDP and economic instability?
How would you compare the financial strength and economic stability of Ireland vs Germany? What about vs Austria?
Looking at the above chart (Ill paste it again below for your review), wouldnt you agree that there is strong evidence that there is not a direct correlation between total social spending as a % of GDP and economic instability?
mrplunkey
New member
You seem to like "Public and Mandatory Private" criteria for the year 2010.
So let's take a look at that.
US: 19.9% of GDP
Ireland: 23.7% of GDP
So in the very best year you can produce to support your argument, Ireland is still 19% higher?
Do you think you're helping yourself? Does picking some other country somehow support your argument? Is murdering someone not so bad if I can find someone who has murdered two people instead?
So let's take a look at that.
US: 19.9% of GDP
Ireland: 23.7% of GDP
So in the very best year you can produce to support your argument, Ireland is still 19% higher?
Do you think you're helping yourself? Does picking some other country somehow support your argument? Is murdering someone not so bad if I can find someone who has murdered two people instead?
My bad - did you not see the simple and straightforward questions I posed to you?
Here they are again:
1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
3) How would you compare the financial strength and economic stability of Ireland vs Germany? What about vs Austria?
4) Wouldnt you agree that there is strong evidence that there is not a direct correlation between total social spending as a % of GDP and economic instability?
PICK3
New member
Because I have some free time, Ill add a few more questions in:
How would you compare the financial strength and economic stability of Ireland vs Germany? What about vs Austria?
Looking at the above chart (Ill paste it again below for your review), wouldnt you agree that there is strong evidence that there is not a direct correlation between total social spending as a % of GDP and economic instability?
I think a youtube wood be appropriate at this juncture
mrplunkey
New member
Yeah, let's have a discussion around Germany's financial strength instead of Ireland's social safety net.
Aren't you the one always bloviating about people changing the subject?
Just put down the shovel. You're entertaining me far too much. This is RedScam(TM)-worthy stuff.
Aren't you the one always bloviating about people changing the subject?
Just put down the shovel. You're entertaining me far too much. This is RedScam(TM)-worthy stuff.
1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
PICK3
New member
indeed
mrplunkey
New member
1) I changed the search criteria to "Public and Manditory Spending" (your choice)
2) I changed the year to 2010 (your choice).
And you were still dead wrong.
This is fun. What's next? Should we shift over to the CyberCollege data?
loolollololollo @ uber-spin. Search this thread for where I said 2010.
Here's whats awesome:
1) You thought that choosing ONLY public spending and focusing ONLY on one single year proved your point.
or
2) You thought someone much smarter than you wouldnt notice if you did so.
Either way youre a fucking moron.
Now that youve conceded by changing the search parameters to include all spending, I'm inclined to think it was #1.
I wont bother asking as you obviously have difficulty answering simple questions.
mrplunkey
New member
Has it even occurred to you to stop digging?
Have you not figured out yet that this is my EF thing?
I let RedScam(TM) write something stupid, then I call him out. Then, instead of him wising-up and saving his powder for another day, he just keeps digging deeper and deeper. I'm taking advantage of the fact that his anger and loss of perspective unhinges him.
And tonight, I'm doing it to you. Notice how conveniently he's bowed-out of this thread? When he posted that Ireland's social spending is only 13.9% of GDP, didn't it set off something in your head? It should have, but your desire to jump on me exceeded your ability to think through something you should have caught early.
And here's the best part: I'll occasionally type-out this explanation in detail. I'll even spell-out how and what I do. But alas, within days he'll take the bait.
You're better than this. I'll concede that. Just sleep this one off and maybe you can get me next time.
loolloollool more of the same. I appreciate you admitting that being wrong and bending over backwards to spin your way out of it is your "EF thing." Just answer these two question, mkay pumpkin? Itll take you just a few seconds. They're yes or no. Once I have your answers on the record Ill leave you to lick your wounds and start another thread about redsams vibrams or something more up your alley.
1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
1) Does limiting your search criteria in the link you provided to only one type of spending give you an accurate representation of total spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
2) Does singling out one single year - coincidentally one of the worst economic years in recent memory where social spending is unusually inflated - give you an accurate representation of traditional spending as a % of GDP? Yes or no.
PICK3
New member
maybe knot
He's so transparent. He knows he's wrong. If he thought for a moment he had a leg to stand on he would be hounding me with follow up questions, asking me to explain things further, etc.* Instead, he's begging me to leave him alone.
Apparently his "EF thing" is extremely important to him.
*Much like Im doing to him right now.
PICK3
New member
He's so transparent. He knows he's wrong. If he thought for a moment he had a leg to stand on he would be hounding me with follow up questions, asking me to explain things further, etc.* Instead, he's begging me to leave him alone.
Apparently his "EF thing" is extremely important to him.
*Much like Im doing to him right now.
bro, you just let your emotions get the best of you, no shame ... it happens to the best of us
you perceived Plunkey's endless p'wnage of RS as "mean spirited" and wanted to stand up for the dysfunctional one. A worthy endeavor, but hardly a realistic feat being as your dependent friend's argument had no factual foundation (as usual).
you, have to understand RS actually likes the p'wnage ... or any attention
nice try considering the material you had to work with though
lol @ the grammar and punctuation. Kudos.
Im not about defending redsam. He's an adult.
Its tough to turn down an easy opportunity to embarrass plunkey though.
PICK3
New member
PICK3
New member
Not worth it to continue sticking up for your butt boy. He knows he was bested, which is why he backed out of the thread.
Not to worry though - I'm sure he'll be back in an hour or two and you guys can go back to spinning and making peener jokes.
Kinda sad that someone as old as him is so immature that he literally cannot stand someone simply correcting him with data after pulling opinions out of his ass on the interwebs. When you see him later, advise him that next time it's best to only talk about selling x-ray machines if he wants to appear in any way credible. Poor guy likes to drift outside of his comfort zone too often and this thread is an example of what happens.
Not to worry though - I'm sure he'll be back in an hour or two and you guys can go back to spinning and making peener jokes.
Kinda sad that someone as old as him is so immature that he literally cannot stand someone simply correcting him with data after pulling opinions out of his ass on the interwebs. When you see him later, advise him that next time it's best to only talk about selling x-ray machines if he wants to appear in any way credible. Poor guy likes to drift outside of his comfort zone too often and this thread is an example of what happens.
PICK3
New member
He knows dick
lol exactamundo.
redsamurai
Banned
listen cancer ward, I don't need 75th defending me. I offered that earlier list to plunkey to see what he had to say about it, maybe the list was wrong..i was just offering what I found. Plunkey however resorted to insults so I know right then and there that he was blowing it out his ass. 75th came in and has further clarified the issue and Plunkey resorts to 3rd grade name calling and you little carcinoma come running in blathering about 75th when all he did was put up some facts. If 75th is wrong he's wrong, but no one in here yet has answered his questions have they? Instead you grotesque little emasculated gibbon geldings come in here and talk about his weener. It's an instant giveaway that 75th is right.
PICK3
New member
btw, how's turd's peen today?
redsamurai
Banned
Lol!
Only whacked it once and stuffed teh wife once.
About to lower my test because I caught myself checking out a chubbster today wtf
Thanks for asking rob
redsamurai
Banned
Listen here chubby...I actually work out. And no I don't go sit on the bench and take 8 minutes inbetween sets while trying to look cool by telling everyone about my castle. I lift then go to braz. JJ class which would obliterate you. You couldn't hang with the females in that school no joke. Your chubbers face would be swollen beet red within 45 seconds, they don't have oxy. tanks so u'd be facked.
Damn you sound tough bro tell us more
PICK3
New member
you roll around with sweaty menzs?
redsamurai
Banned
So even with ur cherry picked data, which admittedly does put them over the U.S....they still lag far far far behind the biggest social spenders on the planet. Countries also in the EU who are not doing as bad as they are.
Honestly until today I didn't really know just how bad they were doing, I knew they were in bad shape but from what I've read people in Europe are predicting they are going to end up worse than even Greece or Spain or any of the other struggling EU countries.
In any case your original postulate about Irelands social netting being the cause of their problems and that only their corporate tax rates are what's keeping them going....has been soundly and thoroughly debunked now. Even if you pull up some data which shows that they spend more on social netting than the U.S...it still doesn't matter. At all.
The issue, which you're trying to divert us from, is whether their corporate tax rate is helping the country as a whole. It isn't. Changing that rate isn't going to fix their problems, they have a huge housing bubble and a huge banking scandal for which people in the banking industry should see jail time. But it's pretty clear just lowering your corporate tax rate so companies can come and launder their profits through you does nothing for the whole of the country.
redsamurai
Banned
jnevin
New member
huh?
lolololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!
mrplunkey
New member
I knew your facts were wrong minutes after you posted it.
But it left me with a tough decision. If I call you out too quickly, it doesn't give you enough time to embarrass yourself. But if I had waited more than a full day, the moment would have passed.
But you hooking 75th into this thing was just priceless. I'll bet he considers the source next time.
PICK3
New member
redsamurai
Banned
Last edited:
PICK3
New member
tr69
PICK3
New member
sticky this bish!
Similar threads
