Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
rustilldown
New member
Well these above posters have much more knowledge than I, and I would advise you listen to them then, I guess it's a bad idea no point in testing it in the name of science as science has spoken already 
No PCT - Continuous 2 week on/off cycling
- Thread starter Discreet User
- Start date
thats all the low dose dbol theory is.. you are just running a HRT dose of a AAS.
yea no such thing as a bridge that doesnt suppress if you use any form of AAS
False. Any exogenous hormones will lower luitinizing hormone.
What Steve said in his posts is spot on
if dbol doesn't reduce LH, then it also means its either fake.. or it wouldn't do a thing for you either. you can't have your pie, and eat it too. (notice the connotation I used there lol)
what makes dbol special anyway? would that work on var, winny or any other oral as well?
Fonz came up with this years ago and his basis for it is that you are taking the dbol in the morning to 'trick the body' .. but there is no such thing as tricking the body.. if there was then life would be simple. the body will outsmart you. i read his whole thesis behind it and its ridiculous bro-science.. he is saying your LH will be effected but over the course of the bridge the LH will rebound. there is no evidence that such a thing could ever happen unless like i said you were to take fake dbol.. there were 2 guys on here a couple years ago who tested this out with bloods and it didn't work out too well for them.
bridging with dbol at a low dose is fine for those who don't want to come off and just want to cruise, but lets not pretend it wouldn't suppress you. that is just not possible and its unproven or everyone would be doing it.. doctors would prescribe dbol at low doses for HRT and tell you to take it in the AM the same way instead of giving guys testosterone and it would be awesome cause it would keep your nuts plump the whole way and your LH and FSH wouldn't get affected.
what makes dbol special anyway? would that work on var, winny or any other oral as well?
Fonz came up with this years ago and his basis for it is that you are taking the dbol in the morning to 'trick the body' .. but there is no such thing as tricking the body.. if there was then life would be simple. the body will outsmart you. i read his whole thesis behind it and its ridiculous bro-science.. he is saying your LH will be effected but over the course of the bridge the LH will rebound. there is no evidence that such a thing could ever happen unless like i said you were to take fake dbol.. there were 2 guys on here a couple years ago who tested this out with bloods and it didn't work out too well for them.
bridging with dbol at a low dose is fine for those who don't want to come off and just want to cruise, but lets not pretend it wouldn't suppress you. that is just not possible and its unproven or everyone would be doing it.. doctors would prescribe dbol at low doses for HRT and tell you to take it in the AM the same way instead of giving guys testosterone and it would be awesome cause it would keep your nuts plump the whole way and your LH and FSH wouldn't get affected.
U
UA_Iron
Guest
FONZ didn't come up with anything novel really, he just pushed primo and stood in the mirror flexing his abs.
ULTER was a champion of the morning dbol bridge. He knew his stuff. Doesn't mean that it isn't suppressive - I think that has yet to be determined.
If you're trying to recover then the AM dbol is probably a bad idea. If you're bridging, it's probably ok.
Testimonials of the dbol used during PCT etc are widely available on this board:
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/p...py/my-pct-dbol-after-coulpe-years-498517.html
^^^ all that guy said was "his nuts came back and he has a sex drive" and Ulter chimed in that his post proved AM dbol works and it helps prevent a pct crash.. no shit!! i'm sure using AAS in your pct is gonna make you feel great and prevent a crash cause you aren't really coming off! lol
he never posted any bloodwork proving anything. i don't doubt he feels great on that bridge, but the arguement is that dbol isn't suppressive at low doses.
that whole thread is hilarious. the guy on page 8 says "i did this and had my best pct ever!, no i didn't get bloodwork done but I could feel myself recover" ... wow this site back then was pathetic. nobody in that entire thread was willing to spend $50 to get bloodwork done to prove this theory. they just parroted this idea back and forth and said they would try it and then post later on. and then you never heard from them again
he never posted any bloodwork proving anything. i don't doubt he feels great on that bridge, but the arguement is that dbol isn't suppressive at low doses.
that whole thread is hilarious. the guy on page 8 says "i did this and had my best pct ever!, no i didn't get bloodwork done but I could feel myself recover" ... wow this site back then was pathetic. nobody in that entire thread was willing to spend $50 to get bloodwork done to prove this theory. they just parroted this idea back and forth and said they would try it and then post later on. and then you never heard from them again
