Nelson Montana, why are you so against fina?

[GARAGE GORILLA]

It is simply a tool in a big bag of tools. As you said, some people will accept dealing with side effects that others would not in order to utilize this tool.

What may be a poor chice for you could be an optimal choice for someone else.

Well said.

 

[SofaGeorge]

It's as simple as this: There are better choices.


Then again, some people are just fine dealing with the side effects which I would find unacceptable.

I hate fina. It shuts me down way too hard... and the gains... while good... are not the myth and magic some people claim they are... so... like Nelson... I say why bother when there are other choices that I like better.

 

[Nelson Montana]

Thibox said: Another fully explanitory, in depth argument from Mr.M
......................................
And another, belligerent, yet pointless argument from Thaibox.

The cons of fina have been stated and are well known. Try reading more and talking less. What's your problem, dude?

Silient: I don't think it's a "poor choice for one but optimal for another" scenario.
Fina is a bad choice any way you look at it, but some people are just willing to accept it -- which goes against my sense of logic.

 

[B182]

There is no evidence trenbolone has any progestinic activity. Remember, receptor binding does NOT equal receptor mediated activity. Clomiphene and tamoxifen bind to e receptors much in the same way....

 

[realblaz]

I love veterinary products. Could be on tren + Eq all year long.

And I really don't see why fina would have more sides than high test doses(who makes me very tired/ high BP/accelerated hearbeat) or winstrol (shitty lipid values, liver toxic)....

Nelson, if you could find test acetate, would you say it's a "veterinary" product ? Same with tren acetate and parabolan.
The only difference between human grade and veterinary products is sterility, NOT the steroid himself.

 

[speedy7]

Wake up, Mr. Van Winkle. Nelson has been for days now.

My bad sorry for flaming u. He hadn't posted a reply so thought he was still gone.

 

[Only1eagle]

DrJMW wrote:

"FINA is not FDA approved for human use and therefore it is not legal to possess under any circumstances."

Sorry to nit-pick but it IS legal to possess. Even once you convert it it is still legal.

Now what you USE it for can be legal or illegal.

 

[Nelson Montana]

I think realbiaz's statement sums it up "The only difference is sterility."

How the hell do you inject something nto youself that may not be sterile!?!

Besides, there is a difference in steroids. Some have harsher side effects than others and fina is among that group.

 

[alien amp pharm]

I hate fina. It shuts me down way too hard... and the gains... while good... are not the myth and magic some people claim they are... so... like Nelson... I say why bother when there are other choices that I like better.

Agreed. For me:

1. Had only average gains
2. Bromo gave me bad headaches and nosebleeds
3. Had to worry about sterilization
4. Had much better gains/fat loss from Winny
5. Shut me down
6. Had extremely puffy nips
7. Everyday injections suck!

 

[Mikey]

I have to agree with Nelson on this point, including the sterility issue.