if this were some anonymous, white, redneck (like the ones i know back home that have been raising pitbulls for generations) no one would give a hairy rats ass...michael vick is a football player...i could give two shits what he thinks about animals...it's not news.
I have no problem with it. He deserves a second chance. He's not going to be stupid enough to go down the same road twice. Despite what some people want to think, Michael Vick is not a monster. He's a human being who made a mistake, and paid the penalty for it.
Ugh, gimme a break. If these white rednecks ran a multi-state industry involving gambling and drugs, and, more importantly, the general public were aware of it, many of us would give a rat's ass to see them prosecuted to the full extent of the law...which they would be. One thing about celebrity, there always seems to be a residual Halo effect. Many times there's no such thing as parity (of sentencing) between normal folk and celebrities. I do give a a shit about anyone abusing and killing animals.
He will be allowed to own a dog again, just not currently. The judge only barred him from owning one during his supervised release, which ends in 2012.I'd say he did more than make a "mistake" since this wasn't one bad act, one poor choice. Doing something over and over doesn't really qualify as a mistake anymore. Regardless, yes he did his time, but like a sex offender who has to register, the "penalty" given out by the sentencing judge goes beyond time in prison, and in his case that means he isn't allowed to own a dog anymore. This is standard and normal for anyone convicted of animal cruelty charges.
He'll just have to deal with it.
then why not just line up everyone who's ever committed a crime and put one in their head.. if there is no reform they must be useless to society.some things you shouldn't get a second chance on IMHO...this being one of them. And prison in no fucking way "reforms" people.
This doesn't make any sense whatsoever? what are you trying to say? Prison is a punitive action and in no way was it instituted to reform anyone.then why not just line up everyone who's ever committed a crime and put one in their head..
if there is no reform they must be useless to society.
Would somebody please explain why HANGING or DROWNING would be euthanasia of choice? Are you telling me they didn't know someone who owned a gun? They couldn't get a bottle of animal anesthetic? WTF is the thinking here? I'm not being a screaming female, I can understand that if you're going to have dogs fighting, you're eventually going to need to put some down. However, hanging the poor bastards, especially those pitbulls with their thick necks, just sounds like unabashed cruelty for its own sake.Here's the thing, information (requested by media personnel) under the Freedom of information Act revealed Vick, personally, hanged or drowned 7 dogs. Total animal deaths were only estimated, and those estimates were in the hundreds. This definitely shows systematic, and institutionalized, abuse.
Its a shame what happened to Vick, any other joe off the street wouldn't have gotten two years. There are murders who don't even get two years.
I can't stand people who treat their dogs as if they're an actual human. What he did was wrong but he got screwed.
...just sounds like unabashed cruelty for its own sake.
Nah bro he didnt get screwed. Anyone with a drug ring, a gambling ring, etc is gonna do time. It wasnt about the dogs. They were the victims, but animal brutality happens all the time. Every day. Probably on your block.
As I said, I work my dogs, they don't get treated like HUMANS, im not a fat old lady who coddles my anklebiters, but they get treated fairly. If you have to beat on a dog it shows what a coward you are. And you say he got screwed, well yeah there's murderers out there but murderers dont get to come back and play in the NFL..... LMAO
I assume you don't want much football. There are quite a few murderers who play(ed) in the NFL.
Agreed. As RW said, he's a thug.
Yes, agree with Southern Comfort, Vick's indictment and conviction really wasn't about animal cruelty. Referring back to Digi's statement in regards to redneck rings...they (hillbillies) would still be sitting in prison on racketeering charges, not the lesser charge of *dog-fighting*.
they're not, though...
"Cruelty might be very human, and it might be very cultural, but it's NOT acceptable."
You didn't say you had a particular example, in your earlier post. My post alluded to common folk (ie your interstate hillbilly operation) in the same circumstance as Vick would still be sitting in prison on the more pertinent charge of racketeering whereas Vick was charged with a lesser violation of dog fighting. I'm not going to argue if there are many such organized dog fighting rings, because I assume there are plenty.
/preach![]()
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














