And legalizing another smokable form of carcinogens wouldn't lead to future respiratory problems? alcohol kills more than tobacco? Liver failure and drunk manslaughters tops cancer
1. Homegrown takes 4=5 months harvest vs Homebrew 2 weeks batch
2. Homegrown male vs female plants pollinating = ruined 4 month crop vs. Homebrew a bad batch, gee make another
3. Homegrown 3-6 oz off one plant (depending), limited space planting vs Homebrew unlimited room, multiple barrels at a time (liquor, brew, wine)
4. Homegrown smell of weed heavily lingers, neighbors calling police, every animal eats marijuana, bugs killing plants, hard to keep PH levels right, to dry, to hot, to cold = dead 4 month harvest. Wait another yr till next round Vs. Wait another 2 weeks for next batch, wowzer
5. Germinating and cloning is difficult, picking out male plants early is difficult, tipping right is difficult vs. Add water, malt, hops, stir, yeast, ferment GEE WIZ
6. Penalty for growing weed vs penalty for homebrew, rhetorical
And that's just going on outdoor issues
American tree is mainly grown indoors or greenhouse hydro, meaning 24/7 electricity (light/heat/humid/temp control) the expense of that compared to churning barrels of liquid isn't even close
[/QUOTE]Modern history, weed will get taxed if legalized also. Contradicting your logic here
I just got done watching a really intriguing moving entitled "The American War on Drugs" Talk about food for thought.
Basically, preventing organic drugs (naturally occurring, like marijuana, mushrooms) from being legal in a very twisted way is a huge business that creates profits in numerous sectors ... and they're not talking some south American dictators, but good old American capitalists: American Drug War: The Last White Hope - War on Drugs
You don't get it. It's closing an economic gate, so to speak. Preventing "organic" drugs from being accessed by the general public just creates a larger market for synthetic drugs. For example, in Amersterdam they've never heard of crystal meth.Looking at it from an economic and social perspective: increased profits likely means increased employment rates. And increased employment likely means greater standards of living for countless families.
I'm HAPPY organic drugs are banned if it means greater livelihoods for many families. I think it's very twisted to potentially take a hot meal off a hard-working families plate, just so some fucking new age hippie can get one more shroom high.
You don't get it. It's closing an economic gate, so to speak. Preventing "organic" drugs from being accessed by the general public just creates a larger market for synthetic drugs. For example, in Amersterdam they've never heard of crystal meth.
If the war on drugs in America ended tomorrow it would put more than 2 billion a year back into the economy that is currently being used to "fight the war" and feed/house non violent drug offenders.
It's the same situation as what happened back with prohibition. People didn't stop drinking, they just drank poison and the govt. spent money (which they could have been collecting in taxes) chasing the bootleggers.
If they cared so much about protecting our health, why don't they make cigarettes, which kill about 1/2 a million people in this country alone, illegal?
alpha-male = scotsman's little brother
Wrong there's no way some half-pint limey prick is related to me.
Besides I'm the youngest in my family.
Cheers,
Scotsman
There is no money to be made from MJ or shrooms because they can't be patented and therefore can't be monopolised. They are so simple to grow that in some parts of the world like india they're actually considered to be pests.
If legalized people would merely start growing there own, and it would prove to be devastating to the alcohol and tobacco industries and will results in increased unemployment rates. And considering our current economic climate, I think that's something we can do without. Such a major blow may just result in a collapse.
And let's not forget about the social implications. I'd rather not have to worry about the authorities turning up stoned everytime I feel the need to dial 999.
Of course they don't really take the general publics health into question regarding this and rightfully so. At ages 16 and 18 people should be able to decide what is good for them and what isn't. If they decide to use either substance irresponsibly, well then that's their problem.
Of course there are the ethcial issues surrounding the tobacco and alcohol industries. But that's a different story.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.