The first time I did DNP I was sweating my ass off at a party. I was just standing in the corner not talking to anyone.
I was just finishing up a deca and sust cycle and this girl just came up and started grinding against me out of nowhere.
I had no clue what to do, and was all sweaty.
I laughed and went to get some ice.
Later she said "you hot eh?" and then shoved my face into her chest.
that right there made me a big believer in pheromones.
As for actually using DNP, like I said, I've used it - regular and crystal, and I likely even know more than you about it, how it works, why it works, and I've probably done dumber things with it than you.
but in the end, I'm older and wiser, and not in any hurry (I have all winter, and even then, I'm not really in a hurry) - so I'm gonna stick with the diet and exercise route

(a very recent change in attitude - a year ago I would have just been doing dnp)
and danielson, I have one friend that has been drinking soy since he was 12. The man is hairless, skinny, and weak. Show me a man with low test levels, and I'll show you a man that is hairless, skinny, and weak.
(technically if his test levels are truly low, he should put fat on in the abs more readily, and he should grow breast tissue more readily as well - he did sort of have tiny man boobs - but he was a runner and burned off some of the calories).
I have another friend that stopped using the soy because he noticed he was much calmer when he used it... and he didn't like that - lol.
I have had 3 girlfriends that used it and noticed their breasts grow in size and their periods change in nature, and their skin clear up.
I agree with you that there have been studies that point fingers at the other studies and say they are bunk - but all studies are like that. They get funding and have egos behind their ideas, so they are going to have some personal time and values vested in it, and want success - one of the annoying things in how a lot of stuides are done - one of the things to always look for in a "study" - see who is paying for it, what they are saying, and who stands to gain from what is being said.
If it were the same lab that posted one study, and then later came out and said "our bad, that was waaay off" then I'd trust it more.
and again, I'm not saying I'm right here - I'm just saying that I personally don't want to use it b/c I don't trust it from what I have seen.