Lab Anaylsis on Triple Threat....

[Milhouse]

To give benefit of the doubt to, no 2 batches of any product are alike and like most supp companies George probably sources his out to a manufacturer so that could be where the problem in this.

Some manufacturers(of any product) get shitty batches going and try to sell it off anyways and the people buying and reselling dont have a clue.

YOu can 2 different batches of prodcuts and get 2 different stories.
Its the discreprancy where the issue lies.

I go thru this with steel all the time which is why we have in house testing that is done randomly and even then sometimes we get problems that escape the system.

So if it really off before doubting the compamy let him deal with his manufacturer first because they are the ones who should be answering the question.

 

[Warik]

Does anyone still have a sense of humor?

I thought my comment was funny.

=(

-Warik

 

[Y_lifter]

hell, I was the target of the comment, and I thought it was funny.

 

[The Shadow]

Re: Where are the lab scans?

Are the lab scans posted with the labs name and info?

Slo - not YET. The lab is also working on a sugar profile as well. I willpost everything as soon as I get a heard copy/. The only thing blotted out will be my name addy and phone #, as I was the one who brought in the sample.

 

[frorider6]

Actually, I just got my batch in and it tastes different than the older stuff. Not bad, but definetly different. Maybe we should run the test again with the latest batch. I guess that all depends on what the second test says and if George is still willing to foot the bill.

 

[The Shadow]

To give benefit of the doubt to, no 2 batches of any product are alike and like most supp companies George probably sources his out to a manufacturer so that could be where the problem in this.

Some manufacturers(of any product) get shitty batches going and try to sell it off anyways and the people buying and reselling dont have a clue.

YOu can 2 different batches of prodcuts and get 2 different stories.
Its the discreprancy where the issue lies.

I go thru this with steel all the time which is why we have in house testing that is done randomly and even then sometimes we get problems that escape the system.

So if it really off before doubting the compamy let him deal with his manufacturer first because they are the ones who should be answering the question.

True. That's why the retest on the protein is from the same sample as before.

Fro - she said a couple of days, sooner if possible.

 

[HappyScrappy]

wow, I'm glad I didn't read this prior to puking that stuff up.

the new stuff does taste differently - maybe less ash, more ass. don't know.

so now I either need to eat twice as much, or just roll in penut butter more often.

damn - this would explain exactly why I'm a tiny little pussy... yeah, its not genetics *points fingers anywhere but myself* - the american way

 

[The Shadow]

About the current results. What bothers me is how a powder could be nearly 30% moisture??

 

[Mike21]

Hmmmm......

Wow...I am suprised ya'll are taking this so lightly. Perhaps since you have a tub in front of you and you'd like to feel better about your purchase. Bottom line from where I am standing though - is that the powder was tested and it came back as having half the protein that it claims to.

You may say that it was a manufacturer error and that it's not every tub and just happens that that one came out this way. Well it's almost a relatively valid point. But I remind you that as far as I can tell - NO OTHER TUB was tested. That means it was left up to chance that as of now, the first last and ONLY batch ever to be tested JUST HAPPENED coincidentally to prove underdosed.

Also - it seems some of you think that because it may be the manufacturers fault then Georgy is ok on this one. I would disagree. Why should the onis be on YOU to test your protein powder for errors in manufacturing? You bought a product, by all guidelines of the BBB it is not YOUR responsibility to test that product. I don't care where the error lies, in lazy manufacturing, or in shady business tactics. Either way George should know what he is selling to you. If he does - then he's fucking ya'll over. If he doesn't, then he shouldn't be in business as he doesn't seem to know how to run a proper business.

Yes, I firmly believe that in a case like this it is necessary to take a completely different batch (one already in circulation) and to test that batch. Though I find it, as a consumer, inexcusable that the results came out as poorly as they did.

Just my thoughts, but I cannot conceivably come up with a logical explanation as to why George would not be responsible for his product evidently being an oversized ash try with a few grams of protein.

I know I just pissed some loyal folowers off LOL so ban me and delete this if you will. BUT the fact still remains - LESS THAN 40 GRAMS OF PROTEIN!! That's is absolutely ridiculous and unacceptable in my book.

M

 

[HappyScrappy]

About the current results. What bothers me is how a powder could be nearly 30% moisture??

yeah, I thought it would be way higher - that is the only moisture I get in the day.

anyway we can get a test on the rat semen content? that could raise the protein I'd guess.

also - it has been pointed out before, and I will do it again - don't immediately go jumping down George's throat on this - he might not have called the manufacturer and said "make some cheap ass shit now and I'll charge the same" - he wouldn't have volunteered the test so readily. it is likely the place he pays to do it either fucked it up, or they are scamming him.

that said - I also wouldn't ever put it past george to do stuff like this too hee hee - had to say it.