Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Kangaroo Court

musclebrains

New member
Unfucking believable. Chesty the Patriot opens a thread that is a mean-spirited attack on someone, then produces a completely unfounded argument that she is a traitor because of her language. When his argument, based on a phantom case, is shown to be bogus, he closes the thread so that nobody can comment further. While so doing, he reiterates a complete LIE:

"I still stand by the premise of the short story.
That one should be bannished for their treasonous statements whether made rashly or with much thought is a correct course of action. "

Hale's short story makes no such argument. The figure in the story is court-maritaled for seditious ACTS, not for "statements." Are you capable of honesty, Chesty?

As for your contention that the story's veracity is being debated: That's only true among people like you who want to believe it. Hale himself admitted, as I told you, that he made up the story and that he had absentmindedly given the name of an Indian trader about whom he'd written other stories to Phillip Nolan. If you are going to argue that the story is "true," then you are going to have to explain how the real-life character of Phillip Nolan was a shady horse trader AND a naval officer. There's NO debate.

What an absurd way to behave. What it boils down to is: "It's true because I choose to believe it's true." What is the point of discourse when the truth is so irrelevant to your adversary?

(Thread in question: Chesty Deigns to "Adjurn" his kangaroo court
 
Last edited:
It is infrequent to read such eloquent and thoughtfull statment in the defense of someone else.
what it boils down to is that Chesty is a proud American, and he appreciates the finer aspects of that society( mine as well) while someone along the lines of myself and others tend to focus on the less colorfull tones of this society. The point is that we appreciate this country for one of it's most sacred features.....which is freedom of expession.....and for someone to circumvent this ideal in the attempt to achieve a form of justice that serves their ideoligical need is inheritly unjust......

so Chesty..I respect your opinion.......but if StorngCHick said anything that fell short of "I am GLad the US was Bombed by the Osama Bin Laden" then you have shaky grounds for your argument.

Muscle Brains you got guts.......and so do you Chesty....i am sure we can all find an amicable solution to all this.
 
Last edited:
Yep, bannishment for her.

You want the thread opened again fine go for it post on it all you want!
 
Unfucking believable. Chesty the Patriot opens a thread that is a mean-spirited attack on someone, then produces a completely unfounded argument that she is a traitor because of her language. When his argument, based on a phantom case, is shown to be bogus, he closes the thread so that nobody can comment further. While so doing, he reiterates a complete LIE:

Mean you call that mean. Give me a Fing break! Mean is when a Communist Traitor squats down pisses and then spits on the souls of the dead! That's what I call mean. Chesty is just a normal red blooded american that loves his boobies and his cherry pie! So if that makes him a bad American, Then Scotty beam me up cause this world has gone to hell!!!!:mad:
 
DcupSheepNipples said:

Chesty is just a normal red blooded american that loves his boobies and his cherry pie! So if that makes him a bad American, Then Scotty beam me up cause this world has gone to hell!!!!:mad:

I guess a moderator edited the post in which I criticized Chesty's taste for nipples and cherries. I could have sworn I was talking about freedom of expression and fair representation of the facts.
 
What nipples and cherries, I love nipples on 25 year old female virgins. Too bad there aren't any!
 
Is blatant anti-Americanism an appropriate freedom of expression in the wake of the WTC disaster? Kind of like fucking an unconscious girl in my book. Pretty tasteless. But she didn't say no I guess some would feel they have a right and exercise it.
 
Test boy said:
Is blatant anti-Americanism an appropriate freedom of expression in the wake of the WTC disaster? Kind of like fucking an unconscious girl in my book. Pretty tasteless. But she didn't say no I guess some would feel they have a right and exercise it.

It's reasonable to suggest that questioning America's integrity in the world is going to especially rile people when so many of us are still angry and grieving.

But I don't think it's reasonable to say people asking difficult questions are un-American....unless, as you imply, being tasteless is the same thing as being un-American.
 
musclebrains said:


It's reasonable to suggest that questioning America's integrity in the world is going to especially rile people when so many of us are still angry and grieving.

But I don't think it's reasonable to say people asking difficult questions are un-American....unless, as you imply, being tasteless is the same thing as being un-American.
Huh...you can be pretty damned reasonable for a liberal.
 
But I don't think it's reasonable to say people asking difficult questions are un-American....unless, as you imply, being tasteless is the same thing as being un-American.

Yes, that is true, but supporting the destruction of The Constitution of The United States Of Amercia is not. Without the Constitution there is no Free Speech, or Boobies or Cherry Pie!:D
 
And making statements about deserving death and destruction are not questioning either.

Yes, I got that, and I have a sense of humor. But make no mistake there are three things you don't fuck with while I am in existence:

3. My family

2. My country

1. My Marine Corps

We stay away from that we be okay. Tread there and well....
 
DcupSheepNipples said:


Yes, that is true, but supporting the destruction of The Constitution of The United States Of Amercia is not. Without the Constitution there is no Free Speech, or Boobies or Cherry Pie!:D

Nobody's supported the destruction of the Constitution. You remain free to talk filthy, fondle tits and do whatever unspeakable things you do with cherry pies.

You know, though, it's true that one of the things Osama's folks hate most about America is our sexual freedom.
 
musclebrains said:


Nobody's supported the destruction of the Constitution. You remain free to talk filthy, fondle tits and do whatever unspeakable things you do with cherry pies.

You know, though, it's true that one of the things Osama's folks hate most about America is our sexual freedom.

I read that somewhere as well. Interesting considering how uptight we are by European standards.
 
This I totally agree with.

chesty said:
And making statements about deserving death and destruction are not questioning either.

Yes, I got that, and I have a sense of humor. But make no mistake there are three things you don't fuck with while I am in existence:

3. My family

2. My country

1. My Marine Corps

We stay away from that we be okay. Tread there and well....
 
A good way to avoid conflict, then, would be to follow the old rule of not discussing religion or politics (or the Marine Corps or family). Fact is, if you raise such subjects, you're inviting conflict.
 
I dunno why it's a sticky....it just became one a while ago..it wasn't sticky when i first logged on....or at least I didn't think so:confused:
 
I made it a sticky to keep the group of posts that this is related to all tied together. Not wanting to hide anything or deprive one of their freedom to express their "views" It will end shortly
 
chesty said:
I made it a sticky to keep the group of posts that this is related to all tied together. Not wanting to hide anything or deprive one of their freedom to express their "views" It will end shortly

I agree with you on all points chesty, but,....

There are WAY too many stickys on this board. If people WANT to view and post on this thread, they'll keep it at the top.

Stickys should be for very important stuff that everyone NEEDS to know.
 
I dont think Osam's boys dislike our sexual freedom...They seemed to visit a few strip clubs before 9-11...then again That statement on dateline probably would be questionable
 
Top Bottom