Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

It's Official: SUV owners survive crashes 50% better

i hope so, with the prices of gas..they better be worth something
 
I think I'd rather get a truck before another SUV.
 
SUVs are mainly safer because they are bigger than other vehicles, although to a slight extent it also because they do better in crashes w/stationary objects.

if everyone just keeps buying heavier vehicles in an endless race to exploit other drivers, drivers will be less safe overall because collisions will occur with continually increasing force, not to mention the loss of maneuverability increasing crash frequency, while the marginal benefit of stationary object collision safety diminishes.

if we all drove smaller cars, we'd be a little less safe in stationary object collisions, but a lot safer in car to car crashes because crumple zones would have less energy to absorb. we'd be safer overall.

there is a cutoff with downsizing too because at some point you aren't safe enough with common obstacles people hit like deer or barriers and it outweighs your v2v benefits.

but the right direction currently for overall driver safety is still towards downsizing imo.

as a policymaker i'd push for smaller cars, as a consumer i'd push for bigger. luckily we have government to save us from tragedy of the commons
 
SUVs are mainly safer because they are bigger than other vehicles, although to a slight extent it also because they do better in crashes w/stationary objects.

if everyone just keeps buying heavier vehicles in an endless race to exploit other drivers, drivers will be less safe overall because collisions will occur with continually increasing force, not to mention the loss of maneuverability increasing crash frequency, while the marginal benefit of stationary object collision safety diminishes.

if we all drove smaller cars, we'd be a little less safe in stationary object collisions, but a lot safer in car to car crashes because crumple zones would have less energy to absorb. we'd be safer overall.

there is a cutoff with downsizing too because at some point you aren't safe enough with common obstacles people hit like deer or barriers and it outweighs your v2v benefits.

but the right direction currently for overall driver safety is still towards downsizing imo.

as a policymaker i'd push for smaller cars, as a consumer i'd push for bigger. luckily we have government to save us from tragedy of the commons

I'm ok with that. I'll stick to my range rover. I should get steel plates wellded into it.
 
SUVs are mainly safer because they are bigger than other vehicles, although to a slight extent it also because they do better in crashes w/stationary objects.

if everyone just keeps buying heavier vehicles in an endless race to exploit other drivers, drivers will be less safe overall because collisions will occur with continually increasing force, not to mention the loss of maneuverability increasing crash frequency, while the marginal benefit of stationary object collision safety diminishes.

if we all drove smaller cars, we'd be a little less safe in stationary object collisions, but a lot safer in car to car crashes because crumple zones would have less energy to absorb. we'd be safer overall.

there is a cutoff with downsizing too because at some point you aren't safe enough with common obstacles people hit like deer or barriers and it outweighs your v2v benefits.

but the right direction currently for overall driver safety is still towards downsizing imo.

as a policymaker i'd push for smaller cars, as a consumer i'd push for bigger. luckily we have government to save us from tragedy of the commons


I was just going to say, "well, yeah, duh" and mock people's inability to grasp elemetary Newtonian mechanics, but this poast will suffice.



:cow:
 
Top Bottom