Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Iranian Pres. "No Homosexuals in Iran"....

princesa

Elite Mentor
Platinum
rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country. :evil: :evil:
 
princesa said:
rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country. :evil: :evil:

The Islamic religion has a likely unpopular view of homosexuality.

http://www.islamic.org.uk/homosex.html

As for his claims about their being no holocaust. His motives for rewriting history are quite plain, and this reveals his hatred for the Jews and their nation.

This guy is very dangerous, and those in the west who do not take this guy seriously are niave. He is crazy for sure--crazy like a fox
 
princesa said:
rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country. :evil: :evil:
religion.
:evil:
 
5150guy said:
The Islamic religion has a likely unpopular view of homosexuality.

http://www.islamic.org.uk/homosex.html

As for his claims about their being no holocaust. His motives for rewriting history are quite plain, and this reveals his hatred for the Jews and their nation.

This guy is very dangerous, and those in the west who do not take this guy seriously are niave. He is crazy for sure--crazy like a fox

And our politicians are different because....?
 
my father's first cousin was one of the last hostage to be let out during the iranian hostage crisis in the '80s.
He works in manhattan now, and still does embassador work.

he's not pleased about the iranian president being here.
 
i think he is a fast learner. maybe one day he will be as big of a ass-hole scum-bag
piece of shit as g.w. bush.
...then again , no one in the world is close to beating bush in being a scum-bag . to kill 3,000 of his own fellow country men,and take away rights of the rest of the country. b.t.w, when are we gonna go after,catch , and punish the evel do'ers of 9\11. (g.w. bush).? ? ?
 
all though the dude is a tool, I'm glad he's stateside for a visit.
maybe this can improve relations...iran would be a sweet alley in the middle east and would be a major poly coup for which ever usa cat could orchestrate it
 
Moltke said:
all though the dude is a tool, I'm glad he's stateside for a visit.
maybe this can improve relations...iran would be a sweet alley in the middle east and would be a major poly coup for which ever usa cat could orchestrate it

what you think about him being invited to speak at Columbia?
 
Mavafanculo said:
what you think about him being invited to speak at Columbia?
anything to chill relations with a hostile country i think is a good idea.
demonstrates that america is a open country, we allow dissedents to speak, like chavez. and that earns us points...agree?
 
Moltke said:
anything to chill relations with a hostile country i think is a good idea.
demonstrates that america is a open country, we allow dissedents to speak, like chavez. and that earns us points...agree?

yeah but for a different reason - best way to kill lousey ideas/speech is by exposing it to the light of day and defeating it with better ideas/speech
 
Mavafanculo said:
yeah but for a different reason - best way to kill lousey ideas/speech is by exposing it to the light of day and defeating it with better ideas/speech
the best form of pwnishment
 
Moltke said:
all though the dude is a tool, I'm glad he's stateside for a visit.
maybe this can improve relations...iran would be a sweet alley in the middle east and would be a major poly coup for which ever usa cat could orchestrate it

.....good point. lights out for china if that where to happen. the sad part about this is .....t.v and the media dictate to the american people who we should be friends with ,and who not to be friends with.
 
Moltke said:
the best form of pwnishment

lol wrong - I know you think your original answer is the "lib" position (which it isnt) and the "strong" response would be not to let him speak, its the opposite. we have nothing to fear from his ideas being expressed, as long as they can be challenged and discredited.

ground zero, no.

at a college yes. then beat the shit out of him intellectually and expose him for the lunatic he is. the greater the exposure, the less people will support him
 
jordanyfz said:
.....good point. lights out for china if that where to happen. the sad part about this is .....t.v and the media dictate to the american people who we should be friends with ,and who not to be friends with.
but don't act like that only takes place in the usa
same everywhere, examples of it abound.
 
Moltke said:
all though the dude is a tool, I'm glad he's stateside for a visit.
maybe this can improve relations...iran would be a sweet alley in the middle east and would be a major poly coup for which ever usa cat could orchestrate it


It worked out pretty well for Iraq.
 
princesa said:
rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country. :evil: :evil:


He's not the one leading the country. It's the Ayatolah who leads the country,this jackass is the Ayatolah's puppet.

I agree, the man is a frickin loon!
 
jnevin said:
And it always will.

Just seems to me we had Sadam in power and now look at what happened when we got him out.
meh, the abillity to shed allys is a must...we can't be shackled by toolery.
once a friend not always a friend for life.
 
jnevin said:
And how easily do you think Iran would be shed?

optimistically maybe it would be a match that would last
uncle sammy and mohammed skipping off into the sunset together...i don't see how we couldn't bounce on the relationship if it didn't work though, same with them.
 
This is the one good thing about America.
Free Speech did what it was designed to do. It provoked discussion and multiple sides did infact get together to discuss issues. This is much better then GW Bush's policy of dealing with "terrorist" in a larger scope. The issues came out and I guess he did infact deny the existence of the holocaust (atleast the news says he said something to the effect of :I would like more documentation of this event")

Anyway It was definitly a good idea to let him have a forum and discuss, grill , argue, troll or whatever verb you wish to apply to understanding his beliefs
 
gjohnson5 said:
This is the one good thing about America.
Free Speech did what it was designed to do. It provoked discussion and multiple sides did infact get together to discuss issues. This is much better then GW Bush's policy of dealing with "terrorist" in a larger scope. The issues came out and I guess he did infact deny the existence of the holocaust (atleast the news says he said something to the effect of :I would like more documentation of this event")

Anyway It was definitly a good idea to let him have a forum and discuss, grill , argue, troll or whatever verb you wish to apply to understanding his beliefs
minus the iraq invasion, i don't see any future president deviating from the current terroist hunting practices.
regardless of party, gonna be top priority
 
lmao!!! did he really say no homo's in Iran?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..............there might not be too many men there that want to up and marry another man, but homosexual activity throughout the middle east is RAMPANT!! And the more fundamental the place is, the more homosexual "activity" there is. If you're a guy in some radical fundamental hell hole in the middle east.............you don't even smell pussy till you're married. No girl is going to do shit with you because for females the punishment is possible death for "devirginizing" themselves.........that's because women there are still used for bartering goods/services between families. A non virgin daughter is USELESS to a man living in some parts of the middle east. This is one of the reasons why I despise Islam and would never live under Islamic law..........it turns women into nothing. And the quality of your wife depends on how connected your family is. Christians used to do this same shit..........I spit on all of em.
 
redsamurai said:
lmao!!! did he really say no homo's in Iran?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..............there might not be too many men there that want to up and marry another man, but homosexual activity throughout the middle east is RAMPANT!! And the more fundamental the place is, the more homosexual "activity" there is. If you're a guy in some radical fundamental hell hole in the middle east.............you don't even smell pussy till you're married. No girl is going to do shit with you because for females the punishment is possible death for "devirginizing" themselves.........that's because women there are still used for bartering goods/services between families. A non virgin daughter is USELESS to a man living in some parts of the middle east. This is one of the reasons why I despise Islam and would never live under Islamic law..........it turns women into nothing. And the quality of your wife depends on how connected your family is. Christians used to do this same shit..........I spit on all of em.
so what you're saying is that their is a lotta unused/unwanted tang for the unscrupulous god-loathing horny american crowd
 
gjohnson5 said:
This is the one good thing about America.
Free Speech did what it was designed to do. It provoked discussion and multiple sides did infact get together to discuss issues. This is much better then GW Bush's policy of dealing with "terrorist" in a larger scope.

If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.
 
Moltke said:
so what you're saying is that their is a lotta unused tang for the unscrupulous god-loathing horny american crowd


well no.........because women there don't put out until they're married. Clandestine homo behavior is rampant there.............apparently in the militaries it's "REAL" big...........like if you fuck up, you get put in your place by your superior officer. And here's the kicker..........if you get hard while you're getting it in the ass.........YOUR the fag.............but if you stay soft it's ok.

I'll try to remember the name of the book i read that in...........it was about afghanistan. But my army buddy told me he saw some "realy" questionable activity between school children.............he was told to just look away and shut the fuck up about it. But he'd hear stuff here and there during his tours and pretty much confirmed that men can go almost all their lives without EVER having sex with a woman because they didn't have families that were respectable. Then you hear stories about muslim men emigrating to western europe and going crazy over scantily clad dutch women and raping them..............kind of adds up.
 
Longhorn85 said:
If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.



You silly goose, Did'nt you hear that Ahmadinajad only wants the nukes for "science".

I've not seen/heard so much double talk since I listened to C-SPAN ...

I agree, a nuke in any of these nut job "dicktastors" is baaaad!
 
stilleto said:
my father's first cousin was one of the last hostage to be let out during the iranian hostage crisis in the '80s.
He works in manhattan now, and still does embassador work.

he's not pleased about the iranian president being here.



Some of those hostages swear that Ahmadinajad was one of their 'hands on' captors...
 
redsamurai said:
well no.........because women there don't put out until they're married. Clandestine homo behavior is rampant there.............apparently in the militaries it's "REAL" big...........like if you fuck up, you get put in your place by your superior officer. And here's the kicker..........if you get hard while you're getting it in the ass.........YOUR the fag.............but if you stay soft it's ok.

I'll try to remember the name of the book i read that in...........it was about afghanistan. But my army buddy told me he saw some "realy" questionable activity between school children.............he was told to just look away and shut the fuck up about it. But he'd hear stuff here and there during his tours and pretty much confirmed that men can go almost all their lives without EVER having sex with a woman because they didn't have families that were respectable. Then you hear stories about muslim men emigrating to western europe and going crazy over scantily clad dutch women and raping them..............kind of adds up.

This post is nothing but hearsay, unsubstatianed rumors, and not even about Iran.

So you have now come to the general conclusion that muslim men don't get laid except forcibly by men, and rape western women given the opportunity.
 
Longhorn85 said:
If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.


I'm sure bush would have ordered his plane blown out of the sky if he could've gotten away with it. Disallowing ahmad to speak would make the White House look petty and trite..........make them look weak, like this guy speaking in the U.S would undermine them some how. But I am glad they blocked his little stunt visit to ground zero. Other than that, he should talk anywhere he pleases..........the administration should pay him no mind.
 
LOL at this interpretation of my words.
I'm bashing Bush's foreign policy. If his moves were so carefully thought out and competent , then why hasn't Condeleza Rice started the dialog?? He had to come here and have dialog with the President of Columbia University who is not a politician at all and not part of the Bush Administration...

I'm still bashing Bush because liberals obviously has to do his job for him


Longhorn85 said:
If you think it was a good idea to allow Ahmadinajad to speak then you should give credit where credit is due. You don't think Bush could have stopped him from entering the country or speaking?

You are too quick to turn to Bush-bashing.

I think Bush's stance that this nut shouldn't be allowed to have nukes has been validated.
 
So have the students stormed the stage in an intelligent gesture of free speech? Like they did with the minutemen that came to have intelligent discourse about the borders? Surely this head of a known terrorist state deserves to have the stage stormed in a dramatic righteous challenge from the noble students. Me thinks that wont happen and he wont be challenged in the way that he should be due to the frothing anti bush crowd at columbia.
 
Longhorn85 said:
This post is nothing but hearsay, unsubstatianed rumors, and not even about Iran.

So you have now come to the general conclusion that muslim men don't get laid except forcibly by men, and rape western women given the opportunity.


you're right, it is complete hearsay. It's something that will never be written about in any news media outlets. I just found it funny that people in the middle east mock the U.S for supposedly "glorifiying" homosexual behavior when we just in fact let people excercise their god given right to sleep with whom they choose. Yet in the middle east it seems that homosexual behavior is tacitly allowed unless you enjoy it.
 
princesa said:
rofl....he is truly insane....said "holocaust doesnt exist--would like more proof"" I cant comprehend how someone can be so uneducated and lead a country. :evil: :evil:

It's not that he is uneducated. Everyone under the sun has heard/read/seen the holocaust. It's just that the official story and events are based mostly on emotional shock value and don't hold much weight in the way of science/logic.
 
Last edited:
I thought that having him here was a good idea... in order to have a better understanding of the situation we needed to hear where he stands (what his views are) instead of just listening to our government (the same one that lied about weapons of mass destruction). Our government is using many claims against Iran to deflect the failed war against Iraq (correction: our fight for Oil). I certainly dont like the guy who supports terrorism, stands against womens rights, homosexuality, religion etc..but why are our leaders so fast to point them out and squash their mistakes when homosexual marriages are not leagal in most states in U.S and we never really had a women president, we actually funded taliban when russia wanted to invade Afghan and supplied Sadam i mean can it get any worse then that ohh wait yes our soldiers are dying...for what??? Because we dont have control of the Oil in the middle east and we wont leave until we get what we want, thats us and we are bullies and no one like bullies so do you blame the Iranian President to threaten to bomb us?? ...i just think its a bit hypocritical....This is like a teenage argument between two presidents when they can just sit down and discuss things in an intelligent manner (keep your friends close and enemies closer right).

Btw I have to say that im a bit disgusted/embarrased/ashamed by Lee Bollingers speech, what a terrible and a disrespectful way to welcome someone. We are americans with class and should handle ourselves with such manner no matter who we are speaking to.

thanx for all your inputs
 
Last edited:
princesa said:
but why are our leaders so fast to point them out and squash their mistakes when homosexuality is not leagal in most states in U.S and we never really had a women president,

In which states is homosexuality illegal?

We never "really" had a woman president? So we sort of did?

If you want to bash America, at least come up with some facts.
 
redsamurai said:
don't even bother................his elaborations sometimes resemble some sort of fascist right wing propaganda not seen since the 40's

lolol


one thing im not clear about is to why they didnt arrest Mr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when his foot stepped on US soil. I mean he was responsible for the hostage situation.....
 
Longhorn85 said:
In which states is homosexuality illegal?


Correction I meant Homosexual Marriages.....

We never "really" had a woman president? So we sort of did?

I was referring to womens rights and we havent had a women president so far.....
If you want to bash America, at least come up with some facts.


^^^^Longhorns post edited
Im only Bashin our government i mean its only fair to look at both sides correct? There are plenty of facts if you just open your eyes a little ( no offense)
 
It is a big difference to say homosexuality is illegal and that homosexual partnerships aren't recognized as marriages.

Hillary is the front-runner right now so make sure you vote, 2008 could be the year.
 
Longhorn85 said:
It is a big difference to say homosexuality is illegal and that homosexual partnerships aren't recognized as marriages.

Hillary is the front-runner right now so make sure you vote, 2008 could be the year.


well chop my head off wont you lol it was an honest mistake ....Hillary sure is the front-runner and i will make sure i vote that day :)
 
Longhorn85 said:
Sorry I called your post idiotic, I get defensive when I see wanton America-bashing


No prob. Im patriotic as well..love and support US just dont agree with our government ....
 
Longhorn85 said:
Sorry I called your post idiotic, I get defensive when I see wanton America-bashing

problem is you and your ilk confuse criticism of the administration and its policies with america hating and treason.

you like your ideas in thundering absolutes as your sig says. no nuance. no shades of gray. no dissent. just salute and keep believing.

its not only a right but a patriotic duty to protest and criticize a policy that a person disagrees with.
 
Moltke said:
all though the dude is a tool, I'm glad he's stateside for a visit.
maybe this can improve relations
...iran would be a sweet alley in the middle east and would be a major poly coup for which ever usa cat could orchestrate it


That might've happened if his hosts weren't busy mocking and ridiculing him.
 
stilleto said:
my father's first cousin was one of the last hostage to be let out during the iranian hostage crisis in the '80s.
He works in manhattan now, and still does embassador work.

he's not pleased about the iranian president being here.

I couldn't imagine why...

176.jpg


177.jpg
 
princesa said:
well chop my head off wont you lol it was an honest mistake ....Hillary sure is the front-runner and i will make sure i vote that day :)
Dont forget, its the 2nd tuesday in November.......
 
redguru said:
I couldn't imagine why...

176.jpg


177.jpg


In his speech today his justifications for hanging people were simply because they commited a crime and by law thats how they pay for it. Why doesnt the same law apply to him???? Those pictures are evidence, he should pay for what he did...he is clearly a criminal.
 
Are you talking about the overthrow of the shaw of Iran in 77?? The shaw was a U.S puppet put in in the early 50's. It was the same as us fighting the british for our independance. And don't let any conservatives fool you, although the populace of Iran is not quite as fundamental as their leadership, they HATED the shaw. The shaw was a feckless little miscreant the likes of which occupy the royal palace in Saudi Arabia...............and yes, they are hated as well. I don't justify hostage taking, but the overthrow of the shaw was the people's will.


princesa said:
In his speech today his justifications for hanging people were simply because they commited a crime and by law thats how they pay for it. Why doesnt the same law apply to him???? Those pictures are evidence, he should pay for what he did...he is clearly a criminal.
 
jh1 said:
Some of those hostages swear that Ahmadinajad was one of their 'hands on' captors...

i'll be seeing my cousin in a few weeks- he can tell me. he was the last one to be released.
he was a young, good looking father of small children with a full head of hair. He came out a year later being thinner than anyone imagined and almost bald.
 
They do it intentionally. Republicans are good at twisting ones words in ways they did not say things for their own personal gains. It's a tactic which has gotten them many votes

Unfortunately liars don't make good policy

Mavafanculo said:
problem is you and your ilk confuse criticism of the administration and its policies with america hating and treason.

you like your ideas in thundering absolutes as your sig says. no nuance. no shades of gray. no dissent. just salute and keep believing.

its not only a right but a patriotic duty to protest and criticize a policy that a person disagrees with.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
That might've happened if his hosts weren't busy mocking and ridiculing him.
come on dude, happens to a lot to every leader.
imgaine a bush tour of france, think it would be met by happy smiles, rainbows and puppies?
esp major tools like this dude.
 
Moltke said:
come on dude, happens to a lot to every leader.
imgaine a bush tour of france, think it would be met by happy smiles, rainbows and puppies?
esp major tools like this dude.


This whole meeting, bringing him over here, etc. accomplished nothing. What was the point? Nothing new was asked or answered. It only served to make a public example of him on our soil, and probably agitate him and his opinion of us a little more in the process. Really mature of us. The whole thing was nothing more than a publicity stunt. Big surprise.
 
hanselthecaretaker said:
This whole meeting, bringing him over here, etc. accomplished nothing. What was the point? Nothing new was asked or answered. It only served to make a public example of him on our soil, and probably agitate him and his opinion of us a little more in the process. Really mature of us. The whole thing was nothing more than a publicity stunt. Big surprise.

At least they made his camel smelling ass stay away form ground zero.
 
the war on terror is akin to the war on drugs. if broccoli was the chief export of the middle east, we wouldnt be there and this fucker would be irrelevant.
 
superdave said:
So have the students stormed the stage in an intelligent gesture of free speech? Like they did with the minutemen that came to have intelligent discourse about the borders? Surely this head of a known terrorist state deserves to have the stage stormed in a dramatic righteous challenge from the noble students. Me thinks that wont happen and he wont be challenged in the way that he should be due to the frothing anti bush crowd at columbia.

wboztw.jpg



Here's me with the man, Gilchrist. He told me his bodyguards carry tazers now in case there's another Columbia incident.

Dont worry, redsamurai, just another lie.
 
layinback said:
the war on terror is akin to the war on drugs. if broccoli was the chief export of the middle east, we wouldnt be there and this fucker would be irrelevant.


We're there because we're taking their oil, right? I wish broccoli was the chief export, maybe then we would actually utilize it.
 
army_stud said:
We're there because we're taking their oil, right? I wish broccoli was the chief export, maybe then we would actually utilize it.
naaaaa, it is not that "black and white" it is about " strategic placement and our presence militarily. i would love to change paradigms with you, as mine is complex and makes me have to think. if we are there to liberate people from a terrible dictator, why didnt we start with south america? plenty of those scenarios in our back yard.

the two things people who support this war have in common is over simplified problem solving skills and dichotomous thinking. you sound like a DEA agent, justifying the war on drugs. who says the world wants our experimental government style? bush is clearly an idiot and does not understand views that are incongruent with his.
:evil:
 
can't we all just get along in this world?








and allow me to kill the stupid fucks who don't see it my way?
 
layinback said:
naaaaa, it is not that "black and white" it is about " strategic placement and our presence militarily. i would love to change paradigms with you, as mine is complex and makes me have to think. if we are there to liberate people from a terrible dictator, why didnt we start with south america? plenty of those scenarios in our back yard.

the two things people who support this war have in common is over simplified problem solving skills and dichotomous thinking. you sound like a DEA agent, justifying the war on drugs. who says the world wants our experimental government style? bush is clearly an idiot and does not understand views that are incongruent with his.
:evil:

I must of missed the CIA report of South America creating WMD's. I was under the impression that's initially why we invaded Iraq, right? Or was the CIA in on the 'conspiracy' too?

If things were up to your kind, we would be all over Africa stopping their civil wars. Do you believe in intervening in Darfur? Why do you assume we don't? Sudan has abundant oil reserves, so you can't use the 'oil' argument. I'm assuming it's because Darfur isn't posing much of a threat to the U.S.
 
Longhorn85 said:
In which states is homosexuality illegal?

We never "really" had a woman president? So we sort of did?

If you want to bash America, at least come up with some facts.


In most states homosexuality, sodomy, and oral sex are illegal.
 
army_stud said:
wboztw.jpg



Here's me with the man, Gilchrist. He told me his bodyguards carry tazers now in case there's another Columbia incident.

Dont worry, redsamurai, just another lie.


well, looks like we can scratch "gear user" off the list of lies............holy moses you're jacked, I like how you fill that shirt out with your bulging pecs and delts. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.......................deep breath.........BWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH



Holy shit dude, do you even work out? I mean, it's not just your size cause there's plenty of smaller dudes here that are jacked and athletic looking. I mean..........you look like some abercrombie wannabe stoner with your open collar and your wrinkled ass shirt. Oh my god, wait till AAP sashay's his way in here and see's that getup..........you're done. And that haircut........wtf? Are you trying to be dumb and dumber? I'll let you pick if I call you harry or loyd from now on.................... :lmao:


special forces my ass............you look like you haven't done a single pushup or pullup in your life. Bad move posting that pic and having it dated at the bottom so we can all see what you looked like less than a year ago.............further proves that you were full of shit about everything you've said. :rolleyes:
 
army_stud said:
I must of missed the CIA report of South America creating WMD's. I was under the impression that's initially why we invaded Iraq, right? Or was the CIA in on the 'conspiracy' too?

If things were up to your kind, we would be all over Africa stopping their civil wars. Do you believe in intervening in Darfur? Why do you assume we don't? Sudan has abundant oil reserves, so you can't use the 'oil' argument. I'm assuming it's because Darfur isn't posing much of a threat to the U.S.


once they tap their reserves we'll be there too. But we've got our eyes on venezuela so I doubt we'll make any serious noise in sudan.
 
redsamurai said:
well, looks like we can scratch "gear user" off the list of lies............holy moses you're jacked, I like how you fill that shirt out with your bulging pecs and delts. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.......................deep breath.........BWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH



Holy shit dude, do you even work out? I mean, it's not just your size cause there's plenty of smaller dudes here that are jacked and athletic looking. I mean..........you look like some abercrombie wannabe stoner with your open collar and your wrinkled ass shirt. Oh my god, wait till AAP sashay's his way in here and see's that getup..........you're done. And that haircut........wtf? Are you trying to be dumb and dumber? I'll let you pick if I call you harry or loyd from now on.................... :lmao:


special forces my ass............you look like you haven't done a single pushup or pullup in your life. Bad move posting that pic and having it dated at the bottom so we can all see what you looked like less than a year ago.............further proves that you were full of shit about everything you've said. :rolleyes:

Lol, who said anything about special forces? Where do you guys come up with this stuff? I guess I'm no longer a "fatass".

AAP will join us when he's finished squeezing your cum out of his asshole.............
 
redsamurai said:
once they tap their reserves we'll be there too. But we've got our eyes on venezuela so I doubt we'll make any serious noise in sudan.

This is me on vacation in the beautiful mountains...


dc2zo8
 
army_stud said:
Lol, who said anything about special forces? Where do you guys come up with this stuff? I guess I'm no longer a "fatass".

AAP will join us when he's finished squeezing your cum out of his asshole.............


yes, he is my bottom bitch...........I mean, :worried: , whatcha talkin bout willis?? :lmao:



haha, that pic could be stock footage of anyone.............even if it was you, that could be at any training facility in the states. In fact, given that you're wearing short sleeves........I highly doubt that's the moutains in afghanistan cause that shit gets right cold at night. So please, stop trying to climb out of the hole you put yourself in the last couple weeks. There's probably some modicum of truth to the things you've told us.........but since you obviously embellished them to no end, nothing you put down is beleivable now. Sorry, your cred. is shot
 
redsamurai said:
once they tap their reserves we'll be there too. But we've got our eyes on venezuela so I doubt we'll make any serious noise in sudan.

Top right. More of me on vacation.....

e8tooy.jpg
 
Mavafanculo said:
problem is you and your ilk confuse criticism of the administration and its policies with america hating and treason.

Not even close to the truth. Put away the broad brush and think for yourself for a change.
 
army_stud said:
Top right. More of me on vacation.....

e8tooy.jpg


ok, I'll play along..........no way it can proven it is you no way it can be proven it isn't. SO.................next question.........................who was the idiot who gave you the Barrett .50?? And yeah, you somehow failed to mention sniper school in your long list of accomplishments..........something I don't think you would have done had you really been an army sniper. So yet again, one more piece of circumstantial evidence that you're FULL OF SHIT!!
 
redsamurai said:
yes, he is my bottom bitch...........I mean, :worried: , whatcha talkin bout willis?? :lmao:



haha, that pic could be stock footage of anyone.............even if it was you, that could be at any training facility in the states. In fact, given that you're wearing short sleeves........I highly doubt that's the moutains in afghanistan cause that shit gets right cold at night. So please, stop trying to climb out of the hole you put yourself in the last couple weeks. There's probably some modicum of truth to the things you've told us.........but since you obviously embellished them to no end, nothing you put down is beleivable now. Sorry, your cred. is shot


We're allowed to roll up our sleeves inside the wire, mongoloid. You're right, it is very cold at night, but not at the elevation of our base.
 
I went to dinner a few months ago with a woman who's father was killed by the Shaw of Iran. I asked her how she felt about the current administration. She said they've killed three of her relatives.

It's a dark country.
 
redsamurai said:
ok, I'll play along..........no way it can proven it is you no way it can be proven it isn't. SO.................next question.........................who was the idiot who gave you the Barrett .50?? And yeah, you somehow failed to mention sniper school in your long list of accomplishments..........something I don't think you would have done had you really been an army sniper. So yet again, one more piece of circumstantial evidence that you're FULL OF SHIT!!


Do you have myspace?
 
redsamurai said:
well, looks like we can scratch "gear user" off the list of lies............holy moses you're jacked, I like how you fill that shirt out with your bulging pecs and delts. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.......................deep breath.........BWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH



:
what does that have to do with anything? muscles don't add to a political debate. in fact, most people would assume if you're a meathead then you're a complete shallow dumbass
 
Moltke said:
what does that have to do with anything? muscles don't add to a political debate. in fact, most people would assume if you're a meathead then you're a complete shallow dumbass


I think his post was one of the stupidest I've seen on this site. That's saying an awful lot.
 
gjohnson5 said:
Republicans are good at twisting ones words

No, the problem is when you make statements that can't be defended and you get called on it, you call it "word twisting".

I call it being just plain wrong.

Perfect example posts 28 & 34 of this thread.
 
Longhorn85 said:
No, the problem is when you make statements that can't be defended and you get called on it, you call it "word twisting".

I call it being just plain wrong.

Perfect example posts 28 & 34 of this thread.
watch out he'll put you on ignore like a crying bitch!
 
Moltke said:
what does that have to do with anything? muscles don't add to a political debate. in fact, most people would assume if you're a meathead then you're a complete shallow dumbass


cause he claimed to be a juicer bino................AAP rolled him on that one too.
 
jnevin said:
In most states homosexuality, sodomy, and oral sex are illegal.

In most states? So that means 26 or more. I'm sure you can name them. When is the last time someone was put in jail for being gay?
 
redsamurai said:
cause he claimed to be a juicer bino................AAP rolled him on that one too.


Get your facts straight. I claimed that I just started my first test only cycle.

If you look at my 'all natural progress pictures', you'll see that I've been lifting hard since the end of Jan.
 
alright, I give........you're a beast. :rolleyes:

So how's that barett kick? they don't just give those things to any ole tool..........so you must have gone through some sniper training..............oh do tell!! :) :Chef: :rolleyes:
 
redsamurai said:
alright, I give........you're a beast. :rolleyes:

So how's that barett kick? they don't just give those things to any ole tool..........so you must have gone through some sniper training..............oh do tell!! :) :Chef: :rolleyes:


The barRett actually doesn't kick too bad, considering it has a double recoil system. Depending on your unit, infantry officer's have to qualify on the .50. That doesn't mean you have to attend sniper school.
 
army_stud said:
, infantry officer's have to qualify on the .50. That doesn't mean you have to attend sniper school.


why? Firing a .50 means you're engaging targets at well over a mile...........that means you need some serious training to put rounds on target at that distance. Why would an officer have to qualify with the .50 instead of .308? My only knowledge of sniping comes from my friend who was with seal team 4...........he took sniper training even though he was the SAW gunner in his unit. He went to south america for a year to learn that shit.
 
redsamurai said:
why? Firing a .50 means you're engaging targets at well over a mile...........that means you need some serious training to put rounds on target at that distance. Why would an officer have to qualify with the .50 instead of .308? My only knowledge of sniping comes from my friend who was with seal team 4...........he took sniper training even though he was the SAW gunner in his unit. He went to south america for a year to learn that shit.


Any random joe can qualify on a .50. Small tactical units don't always like carrying them around because of the weight. Most Army snipers carry the M40/A3, M110 SASS, M24 SWS and many others, but mainly 7.62 NATO round (x51mm).

Another problem with the .50 cal is you're only supposed to engage 'equipment'.
 
army_stud said:
Any random joe can qualify on a .50. Small tactical units don't always like carrying them around because of the weight. Most Army snipers carry the M40/A3, M110 SASS, M24 SWS and many others, but mainly 7.62 NATO round (x51mm).

Another problem with the .50 cal is you're only supposed to engage 'equipment'.



there've been sniper stories in the media about how the .50 played a big role in taking baghdad. And they were talkin about hitting "people"..........yeah, sometimes behind walls while smoking a ciggarette, but people nonetheless.
So why are you holding the barett?
 
redsamurai said:
there've been sniper stories in the media about how the .50 played a big role in taking baghdad. And they were talkin about hitting "people"..........yeah, sometimes behind walls while smoking a ciggarette, but people nonetheless.
So why are you holding the barett?
how is a .50 cal loud ass rifle like the barrett supposesd to be a sniper rifle?
i've shot a .50 cal before and it is by no means stealthy
 
Moltke said:
how is a .50 cal loud ass rifle like the barrett supposesd to be a sniper rifle?
i've shot a .50 cal before and it is by no means stealthy


because it can literally lop your head off at almost 2 miles. Think about that for a moment. A sniper isn't supposed to take a second shot from the same position anyway............well, under perfect circumstances anyway...........at those distances sound doesn't matter much. As to giving away his position............well................that's the rub of being a sniper no?
 
Moltke said:
how is a .50 cal loud ass rifle like the barrett supposesd to be a sniper rifle?
i've shot a .50 cal before and it is by no means stealthy

Tthe accuracy downrange is the only reason it would be used in that capacity. It definitely wouldn't be used in a situation where the sniper would be in immediate danger. Could you imagine lugging that beast and ammo around?
 
Top Bottom