Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Iranian Pres. "No Homosexuals in Iran"....

redguru said:
Tthe accuracy downrange is the only reason it would be used in that capacity. It definitely wouldn't be used in a situation where the sniper would be in immediate danger. Could you imagine lugging that beast and ammo around?


CQB with a .50?? hehehe............have you seen the trailer for the new Rambo movie?? Dude takes a .50 volley to the face from point blank range................very nice, upper torso disappears.
 
redsamurai said:
there've been sniper stories in the media about how the .50 played a big role in taking baghdad. And they were talkin about hitting "people"..........yeah, sometimes behind walls while smoking a ciggarette, but people nonetheless.
So why are you holding the barett?

Because that's the MEDIA... .50 cals do play a vital role in everything we do, but they are mainly used as a base defense gun, or mounted on vehicle turrets. Some snipers do carry them around, widely depends on the mission. Try lugging one of those bastards around for an hour. It's so heavy you can't even shoulder-fire it.

We carried the .50 cal everywhere with us, but not if we had to hump long distances. It does break down, but it's more timely effective not to.

Almost anything a terrorist carries can be defined as 'equipment'...
 
army_stud said:
Because that's the MEDIA... .50 cals do play a vital role in everything we do, but they are mainly used as a base defense gun, or mounted on vehicle turrets. Some snipers do carry them around, widely depends on the mission. Try lugging one of those bastards around for an hour. It's so heavy you can't even shoulder-fire it.

The barrett is supposed to be tame compared to earlier .50's..........???


Almost anything a terrorist carries can be defined as 'equipment'...


so as a .50 specialist you could say.......engage a pair of goggles on a suspected terrorist........right?
 
redsamurai said:
The barrett is supposed to be tame compared to earlier .50's..........???





so as a .50 specialist you could say.......engage a pair of goggles on a suspected terrorist........right?


Well, considering the double recoil advantage, I would say probably. I've never shot an earlier model .50.

SUSPECTED? No.. -- KNOWN, yes. I wish we had more loop-holes, but libs like to tie our hands behind our backs.
 
army_stud said:
Well, considering the double recoil advantage, I would say probably. I've never shot an earlier model .50.

SUSPECTED? No.. -- KNOWN, yes. I wish we had more loop-holes, but libs like to tie our hands behind our backs.


shut it with the lib bullshit. My buddy had to deal with completely unreasonable rules of engagement during the republican controlled house, senate and white house as well as a republican controlled war. There was a time when the house and senate could pass any republican measure they wanted point de facto! And yet my buddy could stare straight at a guy walking with an ak-47 but couldn't do shit unless said weapon was pointed "at him". The terrible rules of engagement were the result of a TERRIBLY planned war where we didn't count on being policeman........which is what our military is not good at nor should they be.
 
redsamurai said:
shut it with the lib bullshit. My buddy had to deal with completely unreasonable rules of engagement during the republican controlled house, senate and white house as well as a republican controlled war. There was a time when the house and senate could pass any republican measure they wanted point de facto! And yet my buddy could stare straight at a guy walking with an ak-47 but couldn't do shit unless said weapon was pointed "at him". The terrible rules of engagement were the result of a TERRIBLY planned war where we didn't count on being policeman........which is what our military is not good at nor should they be.


The war was terribly planned. But remember, a lot of dems voted for the war too based on the intel reports.

It's not about passing ROE legislature, it's about worrying how the media reports any 'innocent' person being killed.

ROE is a very complicated issue. I'm pretty familiar with this case.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2005/01/08/1278799.htm
 
redsamurai said:
because it can literally lop your head off at almost 2 miles. Think about that for a moment. A sniper isn't supposed to take a second shot from the same position anyway............well, under perfect circumstances anyway...........at those distances sound doesn't matter much. As to giving away his position............well................that's the rub of being a sniper no?
i watched the futureweapons episode about the barrett .50 cal.
and it wasn't two miles, more like a mile and half.
and that was under an ideal situation with no noise or distraction.
not an optimal range, more like under a mile for optimal.
and i thought being a sniper was akin to being a ninja, you could be stealthy.
how you gonna be stealthy with a heavy loud gun such as a .50 cal?
i think it's for more anti-light armour purposes as opposed to anti-personal purposes
 
redsamurai said:
because it can literally lop your head off at almost 2 miles. Think about that for a moment. A sniper isn't supposed to take a second shot from the same position anyway............well, under perfect circumstances anyway...........at those distances sound doesn't matter much. As to giving away his position............well................that's the rub of being a sniper no?

Wash?
 
My plan is simple, give Pick3 unlimited xanies and have him move to Iran....he'll geigh up the entire country in one stroke and completely discredit the government......
 
Moltke said:
i watched the futureweapons episode about the barrett .50 cal.
and it wasn't two miles, more like a mile and half.
and that was under an ideal situation with no noise or distraction.
not an optimal range, more like under a mile for optimal.
and i thought being a sniper was akin to being a ninja, you could be stealthy.
how you gonna be stealthy with a heavy loud gun such as a .50 cal?
i think it's for more anti-light armour purposes as opposed to anti-personal purposes


The gun makes you stealthy, if you're good with it. Sniper stealth is a different ballgame from cqc or non-projectile weapons stealth.
 
Moltke said:
i watched the futureweapons episode about the barrett .50 cal.
and it wasn't two miles, more like a mile and half.
and that was under an ideal situation with no noise or distraction.
not an optimal range, more like under a mile for optimal.
and i thought being a sniper was akin to being a ninja, you could be stealthy.
how you gonna be stealthy with a heavy loud gun such as a .50 cal?
i think it's for more anti-light armour purposes as opposed to anti-personal purposes


.308's are pretty loud too.........yeah not as loud as a fifty, but you ain't exactly a ninja when you light off a 308. And I'll check to be sure, but I could swear 50's are rated out to just under 2 miles with "good accuracy". But even if it's a mile and half, that's ridiculous!! In the hands of a marine sniper..........you could ace someone in the next area code.
 
redsamurai said:
.308's are pretty loud too.........yeah not as loud as a fifty, but you ain't exactly a ninja when you light off a 308. And I'll check to be sure, but I could swear 50's are rated out to just under 2 miles with "good accuracy". But even if it's a mile and half, that's ridiculous!! In the hands of a marine sniper..........you could ace someone in the next area code.


LOL


TheHunter.jpg

I ace'd 'im!!
ThePrey.jpg


.50 cal, no less.
 
redsamurai said:
.308's are pretty loud too.........yeah not as loud as a fifty, but you ain't exactly a ninja when you light off a 308. And I'll check to be sure, but I could swear 50's are rated out to just under 2 miles with "good accuracy". But even if it's a mile and half, that's ridiculous!! In the hands of a marine sniper..........you could ace someone in the next area code.
here's the specs on one barett .50 cal
M82A1
Caliber: .50 BMG (12.7 x 99 mm)
Operation: short recoil, semi-automatic
Overall length: 1150 (48") or 1220 mm (57")
Barrel length: 508 (20") or 737 mm (29")
Feed device: 10-round detachable box magazine
Sights: 10x telescopic
Mass: 14.0 kg [about 30.9 pounds] empty
Muzzle velocity: 853 m/s [2850 f/s] with 660 grain, 42.8 g projectile
Maximum effective range: 1800 m
Maximum range: 6800 m
Expected accuracy: Sub-MOA with match ammo
Unit replacement cost: $8010.00 US

max range 6800?? isn't that like six miles?
 
Moltke said:
here's the specs on one barett .50 cal
M82A1
Caliber: .50 BMG (12.7 x 99 mm)
Operation: short recoil, semi-automatic
Overall length: 1150 (48") or 1220 mm (57")
Barrel length: 508 (20") or 737 mm (29")
Feed device: 10-round detachable box magazine
Sights: 10x telescopic
Mass: 14.0 kg [about 30.9 pounds] empty
Muzzle velocity: 853 m/s [2850 f/s] with 660 grain, 42.8 g projectile
Maximum effective range: 1800 m
Maximum range: 6800 m
Expected accuracy: Sub-MOA with match ammo
Unit replacement cost: $8010.00 US

max range 6800?? isn't that like six miles?


We say our maximum effective range is about 2000 meters, or 1.2 miles. Max range is over 5 miles... I've heard of guys getting 1000 meter shots with a .308.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=TOZoYIoyjuM
 
army_stud said:
I must of missed the CIA report of South America creating WMD's. I was under the impression that's initially why we invaded Iraq, right? Or was the CIA in on the 'conspiracy' too?

If things were up to your kind, we would be all over Africa stopping their civil wars. Do you believe in intervening in Darfur? Why do you assume we don't? Sudan has abundant oil reserves, so you can't use the 'oil' argument. I'm assuming it's because Darfur isn't posing much of a threat to the U.S.
it is not an oil argument. no WMD's in iraq and until we invaded, no terrorist there either. instead of arguing with you, i would like to hear what you think will be accomplished in iraq. i would like to hear what you think about the bush administration. do you believe george bush has a sound and effective foreign policy? do you believe the world needs what the u.s. has in the form of government? do you believe the u.s. government acts in a philanthropic manner i.e. we help countries that provide us no economic or strategic advantage? do you believe we are the good guys? do you think bushes religiosity has anything to do with this war?

what the FUCK do you believe?

i am not a "lib" i am liberal on social matters and conservative regarding finance and small, government. i lean toward libertarian. i support everyone of fighting men and women and i value their service. it is so clear that this war is an atrocity. it is equally obvious that bush is a delusional man with a religiosity bent. he never admits mistakes or fault. he chooses loyalty over experience and capability. he views the world in dichotomous terms i.e. "good and evil." he cant pronounce multisyllabic words and has a difficult time with syntax. he does not believe in evolution! he is against stem cell research. he is YOUR commander in chief.
:)
 
LOL @ army_stud getting pwnage to the nth degree again.

Dude can't keep his lies straight. Maybe he received sniper training while in flight school so he can lean out the window of the jet as he flies over and hit his target. Hey, compared to some of his tall tails, it's possible.

Bitch was claiming to be a commando looking for Osama at age 18-19.

Dumbass claimed to be a corporate attorney.

Stupidass claimed to work for an oil company.

Then the biggest claim was that he only uses roids in countries that are legal and yet somehow that didn't add up because his dumbass fucked up his first shot back in Smalltown USA and it had his leg swelling.

Nice little history for someone that previously had only accomplished the passing of 1st class Infantry Officer.

This bitch is nothing more than a little sissy that has established himself as a habitual compulsive liar because of a shortage of intelligence and a surplus of insecurities and low self esteem. The most comical thing about this is I can't wait to see what he lies about next.
 
AAP said:
LOL @ army_stud getting pwnage to the nth degree again.

Dude can't keep his lies straight. Maybe he received sniper training while in flight school so he can lean out the window of the jet as he flies over and hit his target. Hey, compared to some of his tall tails, it's possible.

Bitch was claiming to be a commando looking for Osama at age 18-19.

Dumbass claimed to be a corporate attorney.

Stupidass claimed to work for an oil company.

Then the biggest claim was that he only uses steroids in countries that are legal and yet somehow that didn't add up because his dumbass fucked up his first shot back in Smalltown USA and it had his leg swelling.

Nice little history for someone that previously had only accomplished the passing of 1st class Infantry Officer.

This bitch is nothing more than a little sissy that has established himself as a habitual compulsive liar because of a shortage of intelligence and a surplus of insecurities and low self esteem. The most comical thing about this is I can't wait to see what he lies about next.

Fonz ?
 
We just sorta gave him a platform to expose the odd character he is. He truly wants to destroy our country and all the ridicule he received might just fuel his fire.
 
Army Stud is going to try to accomplish the enormous task of showing his face in this thread again after being ass raped by the pwnage stick.

To answer your question, yes I am still a mod. Wait... let me guess... you were a Delta Force Special Ops Classified Internet Forum mod for the Attorney board?

Come on now... tell us another lie.
 
Gay people used to be nice and humble. Now that it's cool to be gay, most of them are obnoxious faggots.
 
redsamurai said:
well, looks like we can scratch "gear user" off the list of lies............holy moses you're jacked, I like how you fill that shirt out with your bulging pecs and delts. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.......................deep breath.........BWWWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH



Holy shit dude, do you even work out? I mean, it's not just your size cause there's plenty of smaller dudes here that are jacked and athletic looking. I mean..........you look like some abercrombie wannabe stoner with your open collar and your wrinkled ass shirt. Oh my god, wait till AAP sashay's his way in here and see's that getup..........you're done. [size=+3]And that haircut........wtf? Are you trying to be dumb and dumber?[/size] I'll let you pick if I call you harry or loyd from now on.................... :lmao:


special forces my ass............you look like you haven't done a single pushup or pullup in your life. Bad move posting that pic and having it dated at the bottom so we can all see what you looked like less than a year ago.............further proves that you were full of shit about everything you've said. :rolleyes:
lololo......sorry
 
irans president is way crazy they have hung 4 gay people since he has been in power. thats why " they have no gays" . the gays over there seem to want o live for some reason.
 
justinjones1963 said:
ROFL

We need to take San Fransisco and make it a province of Iran lol I bet things would get interesting quick! :worried:


why do people think that whole city is gay?? I lived there for two years so I know first hand it ain't! In fact, if you're in North Beach or the Tenderloin, and the boys from across the bay bridge decide to come to SF for the night..........things get real serious real quick. I thought bouncing in SF was going to be CAKE!!......uuuhhhhhhh, nope!!

I'd sometimes go to an afterhours restaurant in the castro with some of the girls from the club I worked with...........no tension in the castro whatsoever. No police presence.........no fighting.........no bullshit no nothin!.........Just complete village people stereotypes to amuse yourself with to no end. 4am in the castro is alot safer than 4am in the TL or NB........just sayin. But that little corner of SF is where the gay people stay. Yeah you see them in other parts of the city, but not with greater frequency than any other part of cali. People are just more accepting there.
 
Top Bottom