Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

I thought Texas had balls.

redsamurai

redsamurai

Banned
A Thorn for Trans-Canada - Fort Worth Weekly


Apparently they don't. Talk of universal healthcare and gun registries get's talk of secession. But a Canadian company comes to town wearing scary hawkey masks and saying "eh" after every sentence and Texans are singing long live the queen. I had to do a double take when I saw that TransCanada was able to use eminent domain to gank that lady's property. That's some real shit right there. Where all the republicans in Texas that don't let no one trample on their rights? <-----laughable.


and that lady grew up oil, so she's no hippie tree hugger.
 
Last edited:
I made it to exactly the 1st sentence of the second paragraph before I realized I couldn't give a shit about this story.
 
I read it. Article was off on a couple of points and as usual Redscam does not know what he is talking about.

1) Pipeline is not being built for Canadian crude
2) eminent domain is federal law
3) I agree the lady is getting screwed around. There is no reason why she should not be able to build a road across her property and they pipeline company should take care to restore the land properly. She did put herself in that situation by not negotiating her own row agreement.
 
redsamurai said:
A Thorn for Trans-Canada - Fort Worth Weekly

“I’ve learned that our government is not there to help us — not when you’re fighting the big guys,” she said. “I think I’ll be an activist for the rest of my life so that others don’t have to go through the same thing.”
Click to expand...
I think that the article can be summed up in the last line. It's a little extreme, but it carries the main point that the article has. It's sort of the same as the banking crisis (to a degree...not completely).
 
Sd and Bigass are gonna be pissed
 
billfred said:
I read it. Article was off on a couple of points and as usual Redscam does not know what he is talking about.

1) Pipeline is not being built for Canadian crude
2) eminent domain is federal law
3) I agree the lady is getting screwed around. There is no reason why she should not be able to build a road across her property and they pipeline company should take care to restore the land properly. She did put herself in that situation by not negotiating her own row agreement.
Click to expand...

Exactly
 
billfred said:
I read it. Article was off on a couple of points and as usual Redscam does not know what he is talking about.

1) Pipeline is not being built for Canadian crude
.
Click to expand...


hang on a sec, per the article..."TransCanada, the giant energy firm building a pipeline from Oklahoma to the Texas coast as part of a project that would carry tar sands bitumen all the way from Canada"

sorry to have to go to 7 font on that for you there ole boy but maybe you didn't have your reading glasses on the first time you posted. I wasn't aware there were tar sands in the U.S, care to enlighten me where that is? The lady's entire objection stems from the fact that tar sands bitumen is being put across her land and if that leaks her shit is finished. I think I was reading English but I could be wrong, was that article in Canadian and I'm just reading wrong?
 
I'm not in the oil industry, but I believe bitumen is a byproduct of petroleum used to surface asphalt. So my question is: who fucking cares?
 
redsamurai said:
hang on a sec, per the article..."TransCanada, the giant energy firm building a pipeline from Oklahoma to the Texas coast as part of a project that would carry tar sands bitumen all the way from Canada"

sorry to have to go to 7 font on that for you there ole boy but maybe you didn't have your reading glasses on the first time you posted. I wasn't aware there were tar sands in the U.S, care to enlighten me where that is? The lady's entire objection stems from the fact that tar sands bitumen is being put across her land and if that leaks her shit is finished. I think I was reading English but I could be wrong, was that article in Canadian and I'm just reading wrong?
Click to expand...

Wow - so an article you posted is wrong. Amazing. Obama has to give approval for the pipeline to cross into Canada. He has not. Right now the pipeline is to connect North Dakota oil to to coast.

Wow and I didn't even need big font to pwnt.
 
This act by the Federal government is just another egregious affront to Americans. Kelo vs. New London set the precedent, and now it's here. Private US citizens can (and will) have their land taken from them, against their will, to serve the needs of corporations. To add insult to injury, the Federal government is enacting eminent domain against her for the interests of not only a corporation, but a foreign corporation as well.

But who gives a shit, right? Americans don't give a fuck until it's happening to them. Bit by bit, our Constitutional rights are being whittled away.
 
Although I have no clue as to the facts of the story, I do know that Texas takes a dim view of any kind of government abuse of the citizens. I'm sure there's more to the story than is known, and I'll follow it before commenting. Pipelines of all kinds traverse private property, as there is money to be made, and Texas gets plenty of revenue from all aspects of the oil & gas industry. My in-laws signed an agreement recently for BP to install vapor recovery tanks on their ranch in Jacksboro, and there are pipleline easements all over the place. It doesn't affect the ranch for hunting and nature at all. Once in awhile a pipeline leaks, and it gets cleaned up. There's no smell, no tar pools, or any kind of damage or pollution (other than a noisy lift pump that I wish would shut up and not go HISS-POP-BANG every 20 seconds all night!!!!) But whatever the case with this story, I need to read both sides. Maybe this owner didn't own all the rights, as you can buy land with or without oil, gas, water or mineral rights, or you can buy those rights individually without buying the land. It could be that someone else owns some of those rights, and sold an easement to the Canada pipeline people without the land surface owner's blessings, or any number of other things.

Charles
 
billfred said:
Wow - so an article you posted is wrong. Amazing. Obama has to give approval for the pipeline to cross into Canada. He has not. Right now the pipeline is to connect North Dakota oil to to coast.

Wow and I didn't even need big font to pwnt.
Click to expand...


am I typing too fast? Cause every article says it's part of the keystone project which WILL be bringing tar sands down from our northern poosy neighbors. lol

I mean this lady's whole objection was to the fact it was canadian tar sands. She literally has stated she wouldn't be too averse to it if it weren't for that fact. I think she's done her homework orly. I think someone at TC likely explicityly told her to her fact the pipe will be bringing canadian tar. She didnt' get upset about this whole thing until after she researched this type of crude. So that clearly say's this was told to her by TC in the formal documents they presented to her.
 
redsamurai said:
am I typing too fast? Cause every article says it's part of the keystone project which WILL be bringing tar sands down from our northern poosy neighbors. lol

I mean this lady's whole objection was to the fact it was canadian tar sands. She literally has stated she wouldn't be too averse to it if it weren't for that fact. I think she's done her homework orly. I think someone at TC likely explicityly told her to her fact the pipe will be bringing canadian tar. She didnt' get upset about this whole thing until after she researched this type of crude. So that clearly say's this was told to her by TC in the formal documents they presented to her.
Click to expand...

That is your problem Redscam - you believe everything you read. The Keystone pipeline has Not been approved to cross the border.
 
billfred said:
That is your problem Redscam - you believe everything you read. The Keystone pipeline has Not been approved to cross the border.
Click to expand...

"The Keystone Pipeline already exists. What doesn’t is its proposed expansion, the Keystone XL Pipeline. The existing one runs from oil sand fields in Alberta, Canada into the U.S., ending in Cushing, Oklahoma."

Ummmmm?
 
Come to Texas! I would love to beat your ass if you think we have no balls.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using EliteFitness
 
billfred said:
Let's keep it real bro

Chicago Tribune
Click to expand...

From this article...

"The southern half of the pipeline, from Texas to Oklahoma, is more than halfway built."

So this is the part of the pipeline that runs through Texas and this ladies property and it is infact as previously stated designated to bring in Tar sands crude from Canada, which is what she's upset about. Soooooo, what exactly are we disagreeing with because you just posted an article that confirms the southern leg of the pipeline runs through Texas and it is infact the Keystone XL project.

Keystone Kops: During Pipeline Protest, Texas Woman Arrested For Trespassing -- On Her Own Property! | ThinkProgress

"The Keystone XL pipeline consists of three legs. The northern and most well-known portion runs from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska, and it remains under additional review by the U.S. Department of State because landowners in Nebraska raised serious concerns about its impacts on the Ogallala Aquifer. Construction on the southernmost leg began in August (President Obama directed his administration to “make this project a priority” in March), and a middle leg that is already online runs from Steele City to Cushing."
 
redsamurai said:
From this article...

"The southern half of the pipeline, from Texas to Oklahoma, is more than halfway built."

So this is the part of the pipeline that runs through Texas and this ladies property and it is infact as previously stated designated to bring in Tar sands crude from Canada, which is what she's upset about. Soooooo, what exactly are we disagreeing with because you just posted an article that confirms the southern leg of the pipeline runs through Texas and it is infact the Keystone XL project.

Keystone Kops: During Pipeline Protest, Texas Woman Arrested For Trespassing -- On Her Own Property! | ThinkProgress

"The Keystone XL pipeline consists of three legs. The northern and most well-known portion runs from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska, and it remains under additional review by the U.S. Department of State because landowners in Nebraska raised serious concerns about its impacts on the Ogallala Aquifer. Construction on the southernmost leg began in August (President Obama directed his administration to “make this project a priority” in March), and a middle leg that is already online runs from Steele City to Cushing."
Click to expand...

Which is exactly what I have been saying.

Let me explain it to you again.

Pipeline was to connect Canadian tar sands and ND Bakken oil to Gulf Coast.

Canadian portion requires Obama approval and I doubt will happen so US portion of pipeline is being built anyway.

So in all honesty, the whole argument about all the jobs that will be lost is BS.
 
It's not tar sands, it's oil sands...if you say tar sands in Alberta you will get kicked in the head lol
 
redsamurai said:
A Thorn for Trans-Canada - Fort Worth Weekly


Apparently they don't. Talk of universal healthcare and gun registries get's talk of secession. But a Canadian company comes to town wearing scary hawkey masks and saying "eh" after every sentence and Texans are singing long live the queen. I had to do a double take when I saw that TransCanada was able to use eminent domain to gank that lady's property. That's some real shit right there. Where all the republicans in Texas that don't let no one trample on their rights? <-----laughable.


and that lady grew up oil, so she's no hippie tree hugger.
Click to expand...

Texans are either steers or queers.
 
billfred said:
Which is exactly what I have been saying.

Let me explain it to you again.

Pipeline was to connect Canadian tar sands and ND Bakken oil to Gulf Coast.

Canadian portion requires Obama approval and I doubt will happen so US portion of pipeline is being built anyway.

So in all honesty, the whole argument about all the jobs that will be lost is BS.
Click to expand...


so now you're acknowledging that the pipeline across her land was infact going to be bringing in oil sands from Canada?
So are you now walking back this quote?
billfred said:
I read it. Article was off on a couple of points and as usual Redscam does not know what he is talking about.

1) Pipeline is not being built for Canadian crude2) eminent domain is federal law
3) I agree the lady is getting screwed around. There is no reason why she should not be able to build a road across her property and they pipeline company should take care to restore the land properly. She did put herself in that situation by not negotiating her own row agreement.
Click to expand...
 
redsamurai said:
so now you're acknowledging that the pipeline across her land was infact going to be bringing in oil sands from Canada?
So are you now walking back this quote?
Click to expand...

No dumbshit I am not. What part of the "Canadian portion of the line has not been approved" do you not get? Your own quotes say the same thing.
 
billfred said:
No dumbshit I am not. What part of the "Canadian portion of the line has not been approved" do you not get? Your own quotes say the same thing.
Click to expand...

No, no they don't. You clearly stated that this pipeline in Texas that runs over this lady's property will not be carrying in Canadian oil sands. I have now provided multiple sources that say you're a babbling idiot who's trying to artfully walk back a prior statement which started out with the phrase that I don't know what I'm talking about. You were wrong. Now let's talk about why Texans are ok with the govt handing over this lady's property to a foreign oil company. Not a whimper out of em. Fuck, people in Youngstown OH put fracking to a vote at least. Of all the things that the govt does that may actually warrant secession, Texans don't care until it's universal health care. Can't have universal health care but y'all can have our land go right ahead and help yourself.
 
redsamurai said:
No, no they don't. You clearly stated that this pipeline in Texas that runs over this lady's property will not be carrying in Canadian oil sands. I have now provided multiple sources that say you're a babbling idiot who's trying to artfully walk back a prior statement which started out with the phrase that I don't know what I'm talking about. You were wrong. Now let's talk about why Texans are ok with the govt handing over this lady's property to a foreign oil company. Not a whimper out of em. Fuck, people in Youngstown OH put fracking to a vote at least. Of all the things that the govt does that may actually warrant secession, Texans don't care until it's universal health care. Can't have universal health care but y'all can have our land go right ahead and help yourself.
Click to expand...

I am not engaging in discussions with you anymore as I am now truly convinced you are restarted
 
TexaNS have balls. The people in power are likely not much different than any other professional liars.
 
redsamurai said:
No, no they don't. You clearly stated that this pipeline in Texas that runs over this lady's property will not be carrying in Canadian oil sands. I have now provided multiple sources that say you're a babbling idiot who's trying to artfully walk back a prior statement which started out with the phrase that I don't know what I'm talking about. You were wrong. Now let's talk about why Texans are ok with the govt handing over this lady's property to a foreign oil company. Not a whimper out of em. Fuck, people in Youngstown OH put fracking to a vote at least. Of all the things that the govt does that may actually warrant secession, Texans don't care until it's universal health care. Can't have universal health care but y'all can have our land go right ahead and help yourself.
Click to expand...

Locally I've heard a bit of complaining about government stealing land. Where do you live?
 
tumblr_mcvp0xYQXR1rc7o3ro1_500.png
 
so that's a negatory on trying to choke out a mountain lion? That's fine, just remember your little mincy faggot balls every time you look at that stuffed animal on the wall. Without that firearm it would have raped your chickenshit ass.
 
Lmao bro have you ever hunted in your entire life?

Killing shit on call of duty doesn't count.

BTW, go get 'dropped' by an airsoft gun again you fuckin pussy
 
bigbassturd said:
Lmao bro have you ever hunted in your entire life?

Killing shit on call of duty doesn't count.

BTW, go get 'dropped' by an airsoft gun again you fuckin pussy
Click to expand...


I've never once played call of duty in my life. Not once.

And no I have never nor will I ever sport hunt. I'm not a piker.
 
I've noticed redsam's recent string of UK jargon.

Muppet
Piker

I think there were others not sure. Where is that coming from?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
The 50 most LOATHSOME people in AMERICA!!
Replies
21
Views
4K
Who is John Galt?
W
Top Bottom