F
Frackal
Guest
Re: lmao
Bro I see what you are saying and you're making some good points...I would normally include GHB in there for sure but I have a feeling that that is just not going to be something that the majority will go for because it has legit bodybuilding applications....everything else though, as I DID already mention earlier, should be restricted. I am talking about C-III and above. If you read my post that included ecstacy, coke, heroin, weed, shrooms etc etc ..
Look, I have no problems with these substances but just about once a day there is some sort of post about "coke and roids" "ecstacy and juice" blah blah...
We know that there is going to be increased heat on the net, so we dont want to draw any more heat here...there are several other boards that have adopted these principles...animal's board which has had alot of legal activity as well had a thread on 'too many recreational drug posts' this morning....
I feel we should follow suit. They will agree that rec drugs is what will bring sources down faster than anything. Lets not give the feds a reason to look here any more than they need to.
Sinistar said:so frack your saying no more pot talk, but GHB is up for discussion? as a guy who has had some EXP with pot, i can assure you if theyre gonna shit over herb GHB is fair game.
i also find it funny that most of the ppl on here supporting this was frothing over cialis.
personally, i think this is a crock. some atty general gets a hair up his ass and every american just rolls over. i wonder how we got to this place to begin with.
so in all fairness, if were gonna ban the mere mention of pot and coke, why not ban the discussion of every drug but AAS? i already hear ppl talking about having a script for xanax, so if i get one for herb can i talk about that to?
i hear lets stop talking about rec drugs, and now ppl are trying to carve out exceptions for there own vice. it should be all or nothing, or the rule is a crock. kinda like the elite fitness good guy drug rule.
im going to go ahead and douse myself with gasoline in preparation for the flames, but all im saying is if this rule is put in effect, it shouldnt be half assed, and shouldnt be used as a sword against certian drugs.
otherwise it may be as ignorant as having alcohol being legal and getting tossed in jail for a joint. my 2 cents.
Bro I see what you are saying and you're making some good points...I would normally include GHB in there for sure but I have a feeling that that is just not going to be something that the majority will go for because it has legit bodybuilding applications....everything else though, as I DID already mention earlier, should be restricted. I am talking about C-III and above. If you read my post that included ecstacy, coke, heroin, weed, shrooms etc etc ..
Look, I have no problems with these substances but just about once a day there is some sort of post about "coke and roids" "ecstacy and juice" blah blah...
We know that there is going to be increased heat on the net, so we dont want to draw any more heat here...there are several other boards that have adopted these principles...animal's board which has had alot of legal activity as well had a thread on 'too many recreational drug posts' this morning....
I feel we should follow suit. They will agree that rec drugs is what will bring sources down faster than anything. Lets not give the feds a reason to look here any more than they need to.