Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Got a promotion today!!

Lestat

MVP
EF VIP
I'm on cloud 9.

Just up another level in my current title, Programmer Analyst, but I manage 8 people now and got an 8% bump and 4,100 bonus (1,000 stock options too but they aren't worth anything yet).
 
fistfullofsteel said:
you'll be banging even more average chicks now ;)

Nice!!

Way to go Brian!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!$
 
time to move on bro, you will be undervalued there for life.

But congrats. Never stay more than 3-5 years if you are an over-achiever, they will use you.
 
fistfullofsteel said:
you'll be banging even more average chicks now ;)


^^^^OMG!! that's bad....

Good job! Lestat, I'd be proud too....
 
MightyMouse69 said:
time to move on bro, you will be undervalued there for life.

But congrats. Never stay more than 3-5 years if you are an over-achiever, they will use you.

Same theory applies to women.
 
MightyMouse69 said:
bro, you want to know whats messed up, I was just thinking the same thing.


It's because it is true in most cases.

I told some guy the exact same thing last night. His girl is pressuring him not to go back to school. But, he wants to get his masters, because he can't find a good job.


She is being extra nice it keep him around for her own benefit.
 
txbondsman said:
^^^^OMG!! that's bad....

Good job! Lestat, I'd be proud too....


what? nothing wrong with banging average looking chicks unless you brag about it. regardless, he says he cares more about personality.
 
all the whey said:
It's because it is true in most cases.

I told some guy the exact same thing last night. His girl is pressuring him not to go back to school. But, he wants to get his masters, because he can't find a good job.


She is being extra nice it keep him around for her own benefit.

she wants him fat & stupid, no risk to her for him to leave.
 
fistfullofsteel said:
what? nothing wrong with banging average looking chicks unless you brag about it. regardless, he says he cares more about personality.

average is in the eye of the beer holder...
 
MightyMouse69 said:
How come your title isn't "Programmer Analyst Manager"? I would be pissed.
I make more than Supervisors of IT, about the same as a Manager of IT, I still do a lot of analysis and design, some development, so I prefer to keep the technical title.
 
Lestat said:
I make more than Supervisors of IT, about the same as a Manager of IT, I still do a lot of analysis and design, some development, so I prefer to keep the technical title.

Keep in mind, internal rep and awards mean nothing on the outside, your next job will simply call your current HR and ask for your title and salary. I agree with staying technical (bread and butter) but don't underestimate perception.
 
MightyMouse69 said:
Keep in mind, internal rep and awards mean nothing on the outside, your next job will simply call your current HR and ask for your title and salary. I agree with staying technical (bread and butter) but don't underestimate perception.
I hear ya man, my resume speaks for itself, I'm managing multi million dollar projects
 
MightyMouse69 said:
time to move on bro, you will be undervalued there for life.

But congrats. Never stay more than 3-5 years if you are an over-achiever, they will use you.
this is very true. They have gotten a great value out of me over the years, I did some of my best work as an Intern!

I believe I've been fairly compensated, could I get more? yes, absolutely, I could get more tomorrow if I went looking, but there are some other good reasons to stay here.
 
Lestat said:
I hear ya man, my resume speaks for itself, I'm managing multi million dollar projects

I have held 2 previous associate dir titles, 1 dir title and still keep my tech skills. If I change jobs, they simply go right to the management titles. Upper level management doesn't understand the challenges of programmers, thus it relies on often people with management titles that can't program a do-loop.
 
MightyMouse69 said:
I have held 2 previous associate dir titles, 1 dir title and still keep my tech skills. If I change jobs, they simply go right to the management titles. Upper level management doesn't understand the challenges of programmers, thus it relies on often people with management titles that can't program a do-loop.
true bro, true!
 
fuckin congrats bro....

This has fuckin made my day....very proud of you man :)
 
rudeboyja said:
so, are you a 6 figua nigga?
with bonus, yes. I'm ALMOST the average guy on EF.

6 figures - check
large cock - check
rep 300lbs on bench - working on it
20" guns - probably never
 
Lestat said:
I'm on cloud 9.

Just up another level in my current title, Programmer Analyst, but I manage 8 people now and got an 8% bump and 4,100 bonus (1,000 stock options too but they aren't worth anything yet).

congrats!!!!!!!!!! send me some money
 
Good bro material!!!!!
 
Bino said:
the more money lestat makes, i see him becoming more conservative
Naah, hes a man of principles. I see him walking into the nearest City of SD office and.......no better yet walking into the nearest Federal building and handing them his new bonus, consider it a pre-emptive tax payment attack.
 
Bino said:
the more money lestat makes, i see him becoming more conservative
its actually been the opposite for me, as it is for a LOT of people. hence the power the republicans have over a lot of this country.

Its sort of like the lottery. WHo plays that? Not people who are educated, smart, and have a decent amount of money (in general) its the poor.

Republicans convince people that having a SMALL, near impossible shot at unlimited wealth is better than socially responsible programs that ensure we all benefit from this great country.

We can't have slaves anymore, so we enslave the lower class. We import labor (or outsouce it) from other countries and let them do the work no one else wants to do, and of course we don't pay them anywhere near fairly for it.

Its not about one person, or a handful of people, or an entire organization giving to charity. Its about structuring this country in a way that we all benefit, have a good chance of success, and a high change of happiness.
 
Lestat said:
its actually been the opposite for me, as it is for a LOT of people. hence the power the republicans have over a lot of this country.

Its sort of like the lottery. WHo plays that? Not people who are educated, smart, and have a decent amount of money (in general) its the poor.

Republicans convince people that having a SMALL, near impossible shot at unlimited wealth is better than socially responsible programs that ensure we all benefit from this great country.

We can't have slaves anymore, so we enslave the lower class. We import labor (or outsouce it) from other countries and let them do the work no one else wants to do, and of course we don't pay them anywhere near fairly for it.

Its not about one person, or a handful of people, or an entire organization giving to charity. Its about structuring this country in a way that we all benefit, have a good chance of success, and a high change of happiness.

both sides do that. They answer to the same elitists.

Whether repubs or democrats are in power - you're life won't change one iota.

The useless iraq war was APPROVED by BOTH democrats AND republicans in 2003.

Therefore, the inference that they're both "different" is clearly disproved.

When Clinton was in power, the 'good guys' were the republicans. When Bush is in power, it's the dems who are the 'good guys'. Silly to think one side grew up on the different side of the tracks somehow.

r
 
Lestat said:
its actually been the opposite for me, as it is for a LOT of people. hence the power the republicans have over a lot of this country.

Its sort of like the lottery. WHo plays that? Not people who are educated, smart, and have a decent amount of money (in general) its the poor.

Republicans convince people that having a SMALL, near impossible shot at unlimited wealth is better than socially responsible programs that ensure we all benefit from this great country.

We can't have slaves anymore, so we enslave the lower class. We import labor (or outsouce it) from other countries and let them do the work no one else wants to do, and of course we don't pay them anywhere near fairly for it.

Its not about one person, or a handful of people, or an entire organization giving to charity. Its about structuring this country in a way that we all benefit, have a good chance of success, and a high change of happiness.

fair wages are whatever peeps are willing to work for
 
Top Bottom