Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Gay straight men.

ttlpkg said:


Hans, I must hand it to you, that was a great job of applying rationalization to justify behavior.

To argue your point though, you are assuming that a man would be aware of whether or not a woman was ovulating every time they had sex. A man having sex with a woman is obviously quite natural, man on man sex is clearly not.

He is arguing no such thing. His point is simply that to call heterosexual fucking more "natural" because it can be procreative is to deny that sex occurs just as often for pure pleasure, in which case definitions of "natural" attached to procreation are completely beside the point.

It is "natural" to have sex for pleasure. Heterosexuals engage in all kinds of sex play that has nothing to do with procreation.
 
just out of curiosity - where does my constant deragned molestation of livestock in a sexual manner fit in to all this?

I am so NOT gay because I would never EVER fuck a dude sheep - only the chicks.
 
musclebrains said:
It is "natural" to have sex for pleasure. Heterosexuals engage in all kinds of sex play that has nothing to do with procreation.

I agree with this (and I am hetero). The "it's wrong because it isn't natural" argument just doesn't hold water.
 
HappyScrappy said:
just out of curiosity - where does my constant deragned molestation of livestock in a sexual manner fit in to all this?

I am so NOT gay because I would never EVER fuck a dude sheep - only the chicks.


Well, really, since the sex involves inserting your small penis into the vaginas rather than anuses of livestock, it's completely natural.

However, could you explain how you fuck a chicken, even with a penis as small as yours?
 
HappyScrappy said:


a combination of sedation and force. just like any sex really.

HR-NylonBed.jpg
 
Top Bottom