I think this is true. The problem is the conflation of "normal" and "superior."
What deviates from the norm is not necessarily inferior -- high intellect, for example -- but in American society in particular there's such a premium on sameness, that anything that deviates tends to be viewed as inferior in some way.
What deviates from the norm is not necessarily inferior -- high intellect, for example -- but in American society in particular there's such a premium on sameness, that anything that deviates tends to be viewed as inferior in some way.
Then why are we denied the same civil rights you have? I guess, by your logic one can be denied civil rights for being abnormal but, even though you don't have equal legal status, you are not regarded as inferior.
You have an utterly amazing capacity to use against homosexuals the identical arguments of 40 years ago against the acceptance of black people. "You're not inferior...you're just different and thus need to be treated separately -- you know, separate but equal." Black Americans saw through the inanity of that easily enough and gay people do too.
most straight men have at least been in on 1 ----------- throughout their youth. If they say no, most likely they are attempting to repress the memory because of guilty pleasure.
Why do you find it so hard to believe that some men just do not find other men sexually attractive??
I would also like tosee the evidence to backup this comment......normally you post semi-intelligent stuff so I guess you must have some justification for this comment right??
I would also like tosee the evidence to backup this comment......normally you post semi-intelligent stuff so I guess you must have some justification for this comment right??
The evidence has been around for decades -- the Kinsey Report. And it was validated decades later by Masters and Johnson.
I don't think, in any case, we are talking about an explicit attraction to men, but the engagement in homoerotic behavior without the association of a so-called "gay identity."