Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

For Open Minded Thinkers Only

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

flexed1 said:
Oh by the way the flaw in your study . You can't prove that the red heads where given the same test so this study is useless. (lol)

Exactly! There is a fine line between analyzing a study and criticizing it just for the hell of criticizing it.

-sk
 
sk* said:
Exactly! There is a fine line between analyzing a study and criticizing it just for the hell of criticizing it.

-sk

Once again Nelson goes down in a blaze of shame. When is this guy going to learn, when his book sales drop to zero??
 
Juice Authority said:


Once again Nelson goes down in a blaze of shame. When is this guy going to learn, when his book sales drop to zero??

I really don't have anything against nelson. Just think sometimes he takes it a little too far.

I said it before two times and i'll say it again:

WE DO NOT LIVE IN A VACUME NOR CAN ANY STUDY BE DONE IN A VACUME!

-sk
 
Fukkenshredded, no redemption necessary. The posts I have read by you are very good, just some constructive criticism from somebody who used to have the same problem.
 
JA, read my post again, that is exactly my point! :)

jb


Juice Authority said:


Bro, Nelson's failure to respond with evidence that supports his opinion/conclusions has nothing to do with poorly designed studies, misguided members who believe everything they read, or mean individuals whose sole purpose in life is to harass him. Nelson simply cannot find the evidence in question because it usually doesn't exist other than in his own mind. The evidence is his "experience", which is laughable at best. He purposely starts threads like this to draw attention to his theories, which are by their very nature, controversial and then he whines and complains that people are attacking him when solid evidence is presented to the contrary in the form of controlled studies that refute his position. It's really infantile and I hope he grows up one day.

Look what he's doing here. He's using me as the scapegoat to avoid addressing the issues at hand because he knows that he can't back up his position. It's really sad.
 
Juice Authority, I often agree with you but you do seem to be stalking Nelson and glowing and yapping every time someone brings up a point against Nelson. The level of discourse on this thread WAS high, but you seem to chime in to bring it down.

I don't agree with Nelson any more than you do but I'm starting to find you more and more tiring. So your plan is basically backfiring. Give it a rest already.
 
The point that some do not agree with all Nelsons view is fine but he does offer an alternative aspect of AAS. Some i agree with some i don't but unless you explore all aspects how can you contemplate increasing your knowledge and reaching personal goals.

JA i have to say and i have read many of your posts this attack on every Nelson thread has become boring and disruptive for many that wish to read a good debate of apposing views and beliefs. This will only serve to stop people posting and hence bring the board down.

Everyone has different views and posting styles. Nelsons is one and if it aggrevates you so much then do not read and move on to another thread.

Your constant attacking of every thread just disrupts it and no real information is ever concluded.

I noted Ulter commenst that this thread is what Elite used to be all about 2-3 years ago but the since then it has degenerated into teh Elite of the last 6 months!

For the sake of all of us JA and Nelson give it a rest

Wrongun!
 
Fukkenshredded said:
Interesting observation, Jubei. I try to be as clear and concise as possible.

Upon review, however, you are indeed correct and I read like a long-winded fool at times.

Perhaps there is some redemption in the fact that I have posted here less than 400 times in three years...

As to this issue, I got into this thinking that there would be some valuable discussion, and that I could offer some substance for review. In retrospect, however, I wish I would have worded many things differently.

I did delete a rather poignant and unnecessary post not to far back in this thread, for what its worth. Luckily only a few viewers had to endure it...lol

Your observation makes me inclined to go back to my ways of quietude and sparse posting.

In fact, I think I'll start now.

Seems like an over-reaction IMHO.... you have made some great posts on this thread and you're an asset to the board. It would be a mistake for you to look at what he said as a reason for you to post less- look at the positive comments you've gotten.
 
JA- Nelson is over sensitive to your comments but you do jump on him every chance you get. It would be nice if we could have continued this discussion the way it was on the first 2 pages. :(
 
Ok guys, you're right. It was a good discussion that went downhill. I apologize for my part in that. Carry on....
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom