Feeling like death is near....

[test boy ii]

I watched scientific evidence for the controlled demolition of the WTC.

One thing to be suspicious. Another to see scientific proof.

The official story is a conspiracy theory. While the contrarians have thier views firmly rooted in science.

We need a real investigation. That is all.

A hornets nest ensues........

 

[solidspine]

Sounds like a bad hangover.

 

[mountain muscle]

I watched scientific evidence for the controlled demolition of the WTC.

One thing to be suspicious. Another to see scientific proof.

The official story is a conspiracy theory. While the contrarians have thier views firmly rooted in science.

We need a real investigation. That is all.

A hornets nest ensues........

I need a link before I make a call to the boys in S&B on your behalf.

 

[mountain muscle]

I have a theory that everyone on EF is Actually an alter of mine.

Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.

Are you recording this?

 

[PICK3]

enemas work for me

 

[test boy ii]

I have a theory that everyone on EF is Actually an alter of mine.

Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.Show me the blueprints.

Are you recording this?

Well I don't have blueprints.



One tower had a 14% column loss. The other had a 15% column loss. The buildings were designed for 25%


Both sides have made many wild claims. Scientific evidence is likely what caused my illness. I felt fine before.

I tell most people they are better off just believeing what they tell us. I can't do that my self however.

 

[mountain muscle]

Well I don't have blueprints.



One tower had a 14% column loss. The other had a 15% column loss. The buildings were designed for 25%


Both sides have made many wild claims. Scientific evidence is likely what caused my illness. I felt fine before.

I tell most people they are better off just believeing what they tell us. I can't do that my self however.

I still want to see a link so I can peruse the "scientific evidence." There is a ton of information out there debunking the conspiriati, with scientific facts.

Makes me think of the supposedly "earthquake-proof" buildings that were felled with a much smaller quake than for which they were rated as well.

You need to watch The Aviator for the blueprints.

 

[test boy ii]

I still want to see a link so I can peruse the "scientific evidence." There is a ton of information out there debunking the conspiriati, with scientific facts.

Makes me think of the supposedly "earthquake-proof" buildings that were felled with a much smaller quake than for which they were rated as well.

You need to watch The Aviator for the blueprints.

Yea....two of the same engineers that corroborated on the Murray bldg are two of them.

Of course they have counter evidence for 1 and 2. Still waiting for 7. been 5 years. They should be able to say something.

btw...they had to abandon their pancake theory. It ignored the law of Conservation of Momentum.

I still hope they prove their line. Barium sulfate in the dust will be hard to counter. Along with the sulphur.

Plus several stories of melted steel from the aluminothermic reactions.

 

[mountain muscle]

Yea....two of the same engineers that corroborated on the Murray bldg are two of them.

Of course they have counter evidence for 1 and 2. Still waiting for 7. been 5 years. They should be able to say something.

btw...they had to abandon their pancake theory. It ignored the law of Conservation of Momentum.

I still hope they prove their line. Barium sulfate in the dust will be hard to counter. Along with the sulphur.

Plus several stories of melted steel from the aluminothermic reactions.

Still not going to link you scientific evidence?

Have you read any of http://www.debunking911.com/ ?

 

[mountain muscle]

btw...they had to abandon their pancake theory. It ignored the law of Conservation of Momentum.

This is an old argument and has been disproven time again.
The building fell at less than free-fall speed.

http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

I know it may be fun to hold onto certain beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, but damn, even children learn to let it go.

I can post more links if you wish, but then again I am still waiting for your link to the "scientific evidence".