Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

[Maverick]

ok is it just me or is there anyone else who is really depressed after reading the last post.........LOL

THAT WAS SOME DEEP STUFF MAN...

 

[Testosterone boy]

i dont like alex or his buddy david icke.

if you want a video documenting whats what about 9/11, drop me a PM. i have Mike Rupperts The Truth And Lies Of 9/11 on this comp. 2 mpeg files, about 30megs each. ill share them with anyone who wants, i have AOLIM Yahoo and ICQ.

you can also check out the damning case for complicity at www.fromthewilderness.com theres a 9/11 link on the left side of the page. the article is called 'lucy you got alot of slpaining to do.' there are about 100 instances listed, most of them have links backing them up.

personally? i believe there was direct complicity here. minds are made up here, soim not stepping into the ring. but remember a few things:

hitlers election was disputed.

the reichstag fire was later found to have been done by hitlers private army.

after this, suspension of most rights was quickly brought into action

hitlers choice of going after poland was a shrewd move. it was a geostratic pivot.

contrast this with:

election 2000

9/11

USA PATRIOT ACT

Afganistan, who has had 2 straight world record opium harvests since we got there. is that why we really didnt want the commies to have it? and this cocksucker is banning ephedra?

from there was Irag, holder of the second largest known remaining oil reserves in the world. another fortuitous bit of luck in enemies and wars.

most of the worlds oil is in a space about the size of indiana.

when the king of saudi arabia dies, there will be a power struggle for the throne. this means a big hiccup in oil production. and then well be in there up to our nuts.

under mecca is a newly discovered gold vein estimated to be the largest single one EVER.

maybe its because i have zero faith in humanity or its supposed better virtues.... or the fact that i have family that sat on the board of 2 multinational corps, owning one, that i dont doubt bush ariel blair etc would smoke 3000 lives for all the spoils tis region has.

americans firmly believe our involvment in WW2 turned the tide of the war. what is rarely, if ever said, is that hitler was already having severe energy problems by the time we got there. the war machine was going down, we just sped it up.

bush is making sure that dosnt happen with our lil military adventures.

one more thing: clinton had 2 studies done: target 2025 and target 2040. by 2025 most world economies will be going down the shitter, or already there. by 2040, america will be the only productive economy left in the entire world.

clintons plan, which has been blown to shit thanks to bush, was to keep paying down the debt, stay fisicly conservative, and get out of debt and start actual, real economic growth. not the shell games weve had for over 2 decades now. due to our projected great economic power at this future date, we would have the power to bail out who we wanted, in exchange [basicly] for them turning over the reins to us. and so we have a hand picked new world order, indebted to one nation, making everything nice and neat.

for the purpose of infomation digestion, ill leave out the fact that over a billion will starve to death when the shit hits the fan. and it wont all be overseas guys.

in clintons vision, americans would have the least readjustment to lower standards than anyone. americans would be the upper class of te entire world, and our rich would be our upper class. just like they like it. since our economy would be doing something other than tanking and treading water, like it is now, a solid economic base would be assured.

while clintons vision was equal parts nihilism and kid gloves, bushs is violence and intimidation. he has no compunction to do anything with the economy, as a long term shaky economy makes ppl settle for much less than they could get. cheap labor, a capitalist mainstay. instead of playing the stacked waiting game, bush is going in and making a blind power grab for liquid capital and energy. in clintons vision, the rich would be the upper class, in bushs, they will be the ruling class.

either way, the goal is setting up the US as leader and business manager for the 3 emerging spheres of influence: Asia, Europe, and the Americas. how we get there, and what it will be like in terms of repression and state power, is determined by who takes us to the ball. bushite or clintonian.

one things for sure, no loose cannons or populist leaders will come to high office in america ever again. anyone not owned and branded by our corp masters as a automaton to the greater plan will be taken care of one way or another. too much at stake. so, in a sense, democracy or republicanism is dead now. its all a show, bread and circuses.

A lot of people don't like Alec but that doesn't change the fact that Siverstein said they made a decision to "pull" Bldg 7 that afternoon. Silverstein has a lot of explaining to do.

Clintons economics studies projecting the world decades from now should be placed under science fiction. How they continue to present economics as science rather than art is beyond me.

 

[the nature boy]

i dont like alex or his buddy david icke.

if you want a video documenting whats what about 9/11, drop me a PM. i have Mike Rupperts The Truth And Lies Of 9/11 on this comp. 2 mpeg files, about 30megs each. ill share them with anyone who wants, i have AOLIM Yahoo and ICQ.

you can also check out the damning case for complicity at www.fromthewilderness.com theres a 9/11 link on the left side of the page. the article is called 'lucy you got alot of slpaining to do.' there are about 100 instances listed, most of them have links backing them up.

personally? i believe there was direct complicity here. minds are made up here, soim not stepping into the ring. but remember a few things:

hitlers election was disputed.

the reichstag fire was later found to have been done by hitlers private army.

after this, suspension of most rights was quickly brought into action

hitlers choice of going after poland was a shrewd move. it was a geostratic pivot.

contrast this with:

election 2000

9/11

USA PATRIOT ACT

Afganistan, who has had 2 straight world record opium harvests since we got there. is that why we really didnt want the commies to have it? and this cocksucker is banning ephedra?

from there was Irag, holder of the second largest known remaining oil reserves in the world. another fortuitous bit of luck in enemies and wars.

most of the worlds oil is in a space about the size of indiana.

when the king of saudi arabia dies, there will be a power struggle for the throne. this means a big hiccup in oil production. and then well be in there up to our nuts.

under mecca is a newly discovered gold vein estimated to be the largest single one EVER.

maybe its because i have zero faith in humanity or its supposed better virtues.... or the fact that i have family that sat on the board of 2 multinational corps, owning one, that i dont doubt bush ariel blair etc would smoke 3000 lives for all the spoils tis region has.

americans firmly believe our involvment in WW2 turned the tide of the war. what is rarely, if ever said, is that hitler was already having severe energy problems by the time we got there. the war machine was going down, we just sped it up.

bush is making sure that dosnt happen with our lil military adventures.

one more thing: clinton had 2 studies done: target 2025 and target 2040. by 2025 most world economies will be going down the shitter, or already there. by 2040, america will be the only productive economy left in the entire world.

clintons plan, which has been blown to shit thanks to bush, was to keep paying down the debt, stay fisicly conservative, and get out of debt and start actual, real economic growth. not the shell games weve had for over 2 decades now. due to our projected great economic power at this future date, we would have the power to bail out who we wanted, in exchange [basicly] for them turning over the reins to us. and so we have a hand picked new world order, indebted to one nation, making everything nice and neat.

for the purpose of infomation digestion, ill leave out the fact that over a billion will starve to death when the shit hits the fan. and it wont all be overseas guys.

in clintons vision, americans would have the least readjustment to lower standards than anyone. americans would be the upper class of te entire world, and our rich would be our upper class. just like they like it. since our economy would be doing something other than tanking and treading water, like it is now, a solid economic base would be assured.

while clintons vision was equal parts nihilism and kid gloves, bushs is violence and intimidation. he has no compunction to do anything with the economy, as a long term shaky economy makes ppl settle for much less than they could get. cheap labor, a capitalist mainstay. instead of playing the stacked waiting game, bush is going in and making a blind power grab for liquid capital and energy. in clintons vision, the rich would be the upper class, in bushs, they will be the ruling class.

either way, the goal is setting up the US as leader and business manager for the 3 emerging spheres of influence: Asia, Europe, and the Americas. how we get there, and what it will be like in terms of repression and state power, is determined by who takes us to the ball. bushite or clintonian.

one things for sure, no loose cannons or populist leaders will come to high office in america ever again. anyone not owned and branded by our corp masters as a automaton to the greater plan will be taken care of one way or another. too much at stake. so, in a sense, democracy or republicanism is dead now. its all a show, bread and circuses.

cool post. I really like the 2nd to last sentence.

 

[Testosterone boy]

cool post. I really like the 2nd to last sentence.

Yea...his post was loaded with interesting insights.

 

[Testosterone boy]

or so I hear. I haven’t watched it yet. it's half hour long and 80mb, so if you don’t have cable I wouldn’t bother. It took me about 9 min to download.

http://fyleserva.com/video/911/alex_analysis_wtc7.WMV

Has anybody watched this complete video and failed to harbor suspicions about 9/11?

 

[Burning_Inside]

Re: Re: Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

Has anybody watched this complete video and failed to harbor suspicions about 9/11?

I watched it, and maybe there's no reason still for suspicion of HUGE coverup, there's definately "A" coverup of some sort, no denying that.

And Bush Sr. meeting with one of the bin ladens that same morning. Come on.

 

[big_bad_buff]

Re: Re: Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

some things deffinatly do not make sense or add up. where the hell is 2thick? what happend with him, I never found out. I'd like to hear what he has to say on this post

Has anybody watched this complete video and failed to harbor suspicions about 9/11?

 

[XBiker]

It is interesting that the buildings fell with such precision.

Suppose for a second that the airplane had flown staright through the trade center and severed the top 20 floors entirely. Even if the top 20 floors had fallen straight on to the remaining structure, the buildings would not have collapsed like that...the remaining structure would have provided some resistance.

But it just fell right over.

I wonder if this could be caused by foundation damage though - could the impact from the planes have shaken the foundation enough to cause its collapse - although if this happens the foundation damage would have been asymmetrical and therefore the building would have likely fallen over. Something to ponder.

The government could have kept it secret- plenty of stuffsatsu secret. The bigger question is, could a ragtag bunch of Arabs have pulled it off? And could they have kept it secret?

There were phone calls from the planes that said it was taken over by "Middle easterners", and the maneuvers required to crash a plane into a gigiantic target are not that difficult. Takeoffs and landings are the really tough part.

Anyway, interesting read.

They imploded, Matt.

 

[Testosterone boy]

Re: Re: Re: Evidence that the government is responsible for 9/11 twin towers (movie)

I watched it, and maybe there's no reason still for suspicion of HUGE coverup, there's definately "A" coverup of some sort, no denying that.

And Bush Sr. meeting with one of the bin ladens that same morning. Come on.

Supposedly the head of the family.

The Mossad knew about it, the BIn Ladens knew about it, and it would seem that Bush may also have known. A very interesting situation considering you have totally disparate groups here.



I keep wondering...........why. There are so many possible answers. One thing is for certain....the involved parties lack a beating heart.


I keep asking why they told people to stay in the buildings. It is never safer to be in a burning building than outside of one.

 

[Entropy]

test boy:

the reason why its very real is because it allows for one depression and one reccession between now and 2025. there are no rosy estimates like with bushes trickle down theory.

the govt knows where the real war lies, in accrual of energy. win that one,and everything else gets the volume turned down.