Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Everybody Here SUCKS!

gjohnson5 said:
The problem I have is that we're replacing diet and cardio with drug use
And we're basically saying achieving goals is impossible natty. Well that what Ross says...

I disagree with both his scenarios that "significant muscle will be lost" dieting and "someone cannot bench be 200lb @10% and bench 275" I would say that lkeeping muscle mass while dieting is very hard. Bench 275 @ 200lb 10% is somewhat difficuly. But muscle mass losses can be minimized with the protocols I've mentioned before.

1. Slower digesting proteins and complex carbohydrates to keep some insulin elevation in the blood for extended periods
2, High protein and high fiber to feed muscle and help the proteins digest
3. Clean nutrient dense calories and say 200 calories below Basal Metabolic Rate otherwise
4. Cardio @ the 65% VO2MAX level to at most 90 minutes has shown in studies to maximize fat loss while not negatively affecting muscle mass.

I guess what I was trying to say is that cardio does not have to be destructive. We should not be sending the message that we can simply ignore diet and cardio and let drugs do all the work. The drugs should be used after you have mastered the 2 and have reached your natural potential

I agree with everything you said here, especially the last part. Berardi has a good article on T-nation talking about exactly what you said here. His number was I think 60% of max HR though.
 
post 126..

ross
If I even attempted to reduce my calories and incorporate cardiovascular activity in to my regimen without the use of anabolic steroids, I would lose a SIGNIFICANT amount of lean muscle tissue; I have done it before, and I am NOT willing to do it again.

............................................

nelson
THAT"S BECAUSE YOU DON:T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING. DUDE, YOU HAVE AMAZING GENETICS, BUT YOU"VE BEEN ON GEAR PRETTY MUCH NON STOP SINCE YOU"RE 20 YEARS OLD. BETWEN THE TWO, YOU JUST DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET RESULTS WITHOUT STEROIDS AND YOU SURE DON'T KNOW HOW TO ADVISE A HARDGAINER.
 
I am defo not a hardgainer, but I have comp prepped and put ON lean tissue.

My calories were between 1800-2200 (I could check, I have records).

My first qualifier I was 57 kg at about 12 % bodyfat, my last comp of the season I was 60 kg at 8-9% bodyfat.

I am not the only nattie to do this.

Some of you think that testosterone is the only way that muscle grows, not so.

Gherelin, the hunger hormone is one of the most potent stimulator of growth hormone. Oestrogen is also a secretagogue of GH.

One of the ways that testosterone works is to prime cells for increased protein synthesis (via heat shock proteins), which can also be attained with a well timed carb/protein drink (albeit to a lesser effect).

I do think far too many of you have been brainwashed thinking the drugs are necessary.

I know a few UK bber who had to come off the gear for a short period of time, and realised that they had been using gear to make up for short comings in their diet and/or training.

Some of you really don't know what you are missing in obtaining your genetic potential if you think that it is only gear use.

Personally, I like this, it gives me that fire in my belly to do that 'Oh yah, well, I guess I will have to demonstrate this'.

:)
 
chazk said:
I'll take it you didn't know lee priest competes under 200lbs . and he is a freak

Franco columbu was not over 200lbs nor was zane and dickerson
all three of them held mr olyimpia titles
lee labrada came in a close second at 190lbs

AND THEY USED Anabolic Steroids while CUTTING! LOL

Obviously those figures I used were merely hypothetical, but my point remains; if you are a STEROID USER(several cycles under your belt) than you will require anabolic steroids for an OPTIMUM CUTTING CYCLE.
 
Last edited:
xrsist said:
post 126..

ross
If I even attempted to reduce my calories and incorporate cardiovascular activity in to my regimen without the use of anabolic steroids, I would lose a SIGNIFICANT amount of lean muscle tissue; I have done it before, and I am NOT willing to do it again.

............................................

nelson
THAT"S BECAUSE YOU DON:T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING. DUDE, YOU HAVE AMAZING GENETICS, BUT YOU"VE BEEN ON GEAR PRETTY MUCH NON STOP SINCE YOU"RE 20 YEARS OLD. BETWEN THE TWO, YOU JUST DON'T KNOW HOW TO GET RESULTS WITHOUT STEROIDS AND YOU SURE DON'T KNOW HOW TO ADVISE A HARDGAINER.

You really believe I dont know what I am doing?

www.Myspace.com/RossErstling

762461356_l.jpg

1359074527_l.jpg

l_6174dd95078f614ebc5a2d75d6344c4e.jpg
 
People are trying to bark up on the 'terminology'.
Whether you call it 'bulker' or 'cutter', it is still AAS. It has the same effect whatever you call it.

I want to get big (God! I want it so bad). BUT I WANT MUSCLE, NOT FAT.
If you eat excess calories (more than you need to build muscle), you will form fat. I ate too much in my last cycle, and I developed extra fat.
Excess calories = excess fat.

I don't know which method is better: First to bulk and then cut, or have a 'lean cycle' (you just eat enough protein and calories to build muscle, without getting fat). Probably different methods work for different pdople.

If you don't want to get fat, you can not eat too many calories.
If you want to lose fat, you have to cut calories.
If you lose weigt rapidly, you will lose some muscle.
If you take AAS at the same time, that will prevent significant muscle loss, while still losing fat.

These are simple facts. If you don't agree with it, too bad.
 
You DO NOT need gear to be a competative BBer & you can go into a reduced calorie diet but you WILL LOSE a % of muscle mass.
If you use gear as a competative BBer YOU WILL RETAIN MORE muscle mass while in a reduced calorie diet plan.
Example:
On my Pacific Island we have two competative BBing Competition groups. Federation & NABBA. Federation is drug tested & most competitors will be drug free well before a competition. NABBA is not drug tested. On stage it is clearly obvious who those competitors using gear are leading up to a comp. You just cannot get the definition, fullness, hardness & muscle size & lean body mass without some AAS & ancillaries. Everyone must make their own choice. I choose NABBA :)
 
Ross said:
AND THEY USED Anabolic Steroids while CUTTING! LOL

Obviously those figures I used were merely hypothetical, but my point remains; if you are a STEROID USER(several cycles under your belt) than you will require anabolic steroids for an OPTIMUM CUTTING CYCLE.


This statement makes no sense. Someone who used steroids will lose more muscle than someone who does not?
 
Ross said:
You really believe I dont know what I am doing?

As far as giving advice, YES.

I saw your pics when you were a teenager Ross. I'll give it up to you, you've got great genetics. Nobody builds a great frame from knowledge. That's god-given.

As far as how much muscle you've put on with gear in inconsequential. You look good bro. But I see hundreds of guys as big as you every day.

Anyone can take gear and work out. That doesn't mean they know it all and it certainly doesn't mean they know how to best advise people. How can you endorse a product that obviously has nothing to do with your progress? I had to bust my ass for years to gain every ounce of muscle. But I learned how. I competed on dosages you would consider "bridging."

So I guess the difference here is; you see steroid use as a lifestyle. I see it as an occasional aid to bodybuilding pursuits. But irrespective of our differences, it doesn't change certain realities. And the reality is; steroids are growth drugs. That's what they're designed to do and that's what they do best.
 
Top Bottom