Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Europeans - the best race.

ladymacbeth said:


No, but saying fuck off will make me laugh. Thank you HumorMe, for giving this thread the special brand of attention it deserves. :lmao:


;)
You are welcome Lady! My pleasure.
 
The Nature Boy said:


wasn't Constantanople the last city belonging to the "roman empire?" That fell to the Ottoman empire. I could be wrong on that.

Regardless, it doesn't really matter who won. greatness on the battle field doesn't mean greatness as a "culture" IMO.

Rome split into East and West. West fell first, and East, with its capital in Constantinople, became the Byzantine empire - which persisted for centuries before being overthrown by the Seljuk Turks. I don't deny that Europeans have fallen to other ethnicities/cultures (just look at the Mongols for instance). But the heart of Europe has never fallen to anyone outside Europe - it has always done the conquering, not been conquered.

No one is talking merely of greatness on the battlefield. Greatness on the battlefield is but a symptom of a flourishing society. You don't win wars unless you have people (since your food production technology is advanced), and weapons (since your tech is advanced), and brains (good leaders), which come from genetically gifted humans and a societal learning base.
 
The Nature Boy said:


I'm assuming this was paid for by money from the nigerian government. otherwise why build the damn in the first place? for charity? I doubt it. this looks more like a situation of the european "culture" taking advantage of a less sophisticated "culture" if I'm correct. which would be immoral, no?

Definitely, and I agree. That is why we must have fewer such incidents. We must aid the lesser and downtrodden peoples of the earth intelligently - through teaching and not through giving money.
 
well Visigoths amoung other took out the Romans and the moors took them out. While the Moors suffered the defeats the were in power for 7 centuries. Not exactly and over night win there. And you make it out like the one is is on top now is the greatest ever but have your believes I could care less.
 
The Whole F/N Show said:
well Visigoths amoung other took out the Romans and the moors took them out. While the Moors suffered the defeats the were in power for 7 centuries. Not exactly and over night win there. And you make it out like the one is is on top now is the greatest ever but have your believes I could care less.

Sorry, the moors did not destroy Rome. If you have evidence to refute this, please present this immediately. The moors were not in power in Rome, either - EVER.

And yes, Europeans ARE on top now, and they ARE the greatest ever - because they are on top!

If you 'could care less', why are you replying?
 
They were in Spain and Italy hence the darker skin today of spainaird and south Italians. Do you deny this? And I said Visigoths bested the Roman and Moors beat them. Did you read that? I don't care because I not trying to change your opinion on thinking Europeans are superiors as long as you do come at me man to man and try show me how you are superior I can carel ess what you think. I replied because I felt you were stating half truths. I'm not looking at a book or website now but will be glad to email or PM you later.

Your saying who ever is on top now is the greatest ever is like saying whoever is heavyweight champ and the time is the greast heavyweight champ ever.
 
The Whole F/N Show said:
They were in Spain and Italy hence the darker skin today of spainaird and south Italians. Do you deny this? And I said Visigoths bested the Roman and Moors beat them. Did you read that? I don't care because I not trying to change your opinion on thinking Europeans are superiors as long as you do come at me man to man and try show me how you are superior I can carel ess what you think. I replied because I felt you were stating half truths. I'm not looking at a book or website now but will be glad to email or PM you later.


Your previous post made very little sense, so if I misunderstood it, it is because you were not clear enough. Please utilize the familiar grammatical constructs of the English language.

Yes, the Moors were subjects of the Roman Empire, and as such, some lived in Spain and Italy. The Moors conquered parts of Spain, but not until centuries after Rome fell. Rome fell because of two things - declining central authority due to loss of leadership, and barbarian pressure. The barbarians were NOT Moors. Moors never lead Rome. Thus we can conclude that Moors did not destroy Rome. All you have to do is post a link here, to counter my claim. Just one that says "Rome was destroyed by the Moors".

Your saying who ever is on top now is the greatest ever is like saying whoever is heavyweight champ and the time is the greast heavyweight champ ever.

False analogy. Heavyweight champs don't live for centuries or millenia. Cultures/Races/Civilizations often do. Europeans as a race have been around for tens of thousans of years. Now they are at the top. That means they ARE the most successful at this point in time.
 
Zirakzigil said:


Rome split into East and West. West fell first, and East, with its capital in Constantinople, became the Byzantine empire - which persisted for centuries before being overthrown by the Seljuk Turks.


zirakgilly, did the east also become the moslem empire as well as the byzantine empire?
 
Top Bottom