Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Europeans - the best race.
- Thread starter Zirakzigil
- Start date
Norman Bates
New member
Zirakzigil said:
And what was the part about african environmant about that i made?
VicTusDeuS
New member
So if the Roman Empire was killed by the people in the eastern europe then I have people on both sides. I must be great.
VicTusDeuS
New member
The reason why the Europeans were so advanced was because they were never happy with anything..L
ook at how they always had to fight wars w/ eath other and try to take over new lands...
People in Africa were content with their lifestyle. They never hated how they lived or what they did, which is why they continued the same lifestyle for thousands of years. People in Europe never happy with their lifestyle sought out to invent new things which would make their lifestyle easier-Which was the drive for invention and innovation.
ook at how they always had to fight wars w/ eath other and try to take over new lands...
People in Africa were content with their lifestyle. They never hated how they lived or what they did, which is why they continued the same lifestyle for thousands of years. People in Europe never happy with their lifestyle sought out to invent new things which would make their lifestyle easier-Which was the drive for invention and innovation.
A
Aryan_Soldat
Guest
Race is an elusive concept. However, to suggest that no biological distinction exists between groups of people is preposterous.
I don't think it is relevant to argue whether or not Indo-Aryan peoples are superior to other races.
The reason why Aryans came to dominate the world is, in my opinion, a function of geography more than anything else. Necessity is the mother of invention. The Indo-Europeans that colonized the Asian subcontinent several thousand years before the birth of Christ originally hailed from a reigon that was immediately South of the North Pole. Only the most industrious of this population were capable of survuval, ergo, a "super race" of sorts was selected via a process of natural eugenics. After several centuries, when the Aryans had consolidated their foothold on Western Europe, they were confronted with a relative scarcity of territory to support a bugeoning population. The solution to this difficulty came in the form of seaborne exploration, which in turn gave rise to other forms of innovation.
The fact is that just because Aryan-descended peoples were the architechts of modern civilization does not mean that it is appropriate to look down upon other races of people. I have no doubt that many black, brown and asian peoples will be able to prove their mettle once they are exposed to the proper sorts of environments, and granted access to the appropriate resources. HOWEVER, Aryan peoples, like all peoples, have an inherent right to self determination. It sickens me that elites in both America and Western Europe perpetually wring their hands and apologize for Aryan cultural acheivements. Other races of people have the right to pursue wealth, but that right exists within their own native land. Aryan nations should help these people foster development rather than making them wage slaves (i.e. Mexican Americans) and inviting the Third World to invade the West. Nobody benefits from this, and if the trend is not reversed, Aryans will go the way of the Navajo.
ALSO:
I did not have time to read every response to this thread. If another member has raised these issues already, I apologize.
The Aryan Soldat
I don't think it is relevant to argue whether or not Indo-Aryan peoples are superior to other races.
The reason why Aryans came to dominate the world is, in my opinion, a function of geography more than anything else. Necessity is the mother of invention. The Indo-Europeans that colonized the Asian subcontinent several thousand years before the birth of Christ originally hailed from a reigon that was immediately South of the North Pole. Only the most industrious of this population were capable of survuval, ergo, a "super race" of sorts was selected via a process of natural eugenics. After several centuries, when the Aryans had consolidated their foothold on Western Europe, they were confronted with a relative scarcity of territory to support a bugeoning population. The solution to this difficulty came in the form of seaborne exploration, which in turn gave rise to other forms of innovation.
The fact is that just because Aryan-descended peoples were the architechts of modern civilization does not mean that it is appropriate to look down upon other races of people. I have no doubt that many black, brown and asian peoples will be able to prove their mettle once they are exposed to the proper sorts of environments, and granted access to the appropriate resources. HOWEVER, Aryan peoples, like all peoples, have an inherent right to self determination. It sickens me that elites in both America and Western Europe perpetually wring their hands and apologize for Aryan cultural acheivements. Other races of people have the right to pursue wealth, but that right exists within their own native land. Aryan nations should help these people foster development rather than making them wage slaves (i.e. Mexican Americans) and inviting the Third World to invade the West. Nobody benefits from this, and if the trend is not reversed, Aryans will go the way of the Navajo.
ALSO:
I did not have time to read every response to this thread. If another member has raised these issues already, I apologize.
The Aryan Soldat
A
Aryan_Soldat
Guest
If any of you folks are interested in the earliest origins of European peoples, and/or ancient ethnography, read some materials about Vedic Hinduism/Vedic Culture. There is also a worthwhile book by an Indian Scholar titled "Saga of the Aryans". The translation is awkward but it is a fascinating book. I just can't remember the fellow's name offhand. Thanx,
The Aryan Soldat
The Aryan Soldat
A
Aryan_Soldat
Guest
I must disagree with the assertion that European Civilization has been responsible for more destruction than any other race/civilization.
When Whites first reached the Americas, in 1000 AD, the native tribes were perpetually engulfed in fratracidal wars. These "tribe wars" continued unabated until well into the 19th century.
In Africa (Nigeria and Muaratina) brutal warlords consolidated their power by rounding up their enemies and selling them en masse to Portugese, Spanish and Arabian slave traders, men with whom the tribal chiefs held court.
In Mexico and South America, the Aztecs' pagan faith required that they appease the Gods, several times a year, in the following manner:
A sacrificial victim, was led to the top of the "sun temple". When he reached the top, a high priest would break the victim's back upon a pointed stone. As the victim lay broken, the high priest would open his chest with surgical precision, remove his beating heart, take a bite from it, and then place it in an offering bowl. After the heart was removed, the high priest and several assiatants would remove the skin from the sacrificial victim in large swaths, so as to preserve its form. The high priest would then wear the skin of the victim and perform a ceremonial dance.
What is the moral of the story?
The cultures that were conquered by the White man were not peaceful cultures. They were inherently destructive, as are all human socieites to varying degrees. White conquest was the catalyst for the collapse of these social systems, but it was not the ultimate cause. Just one man's opinion.
The Aryan Soldat
When Whites first reached the Americas, in 1000 AD, the native tribes were perpetually engulfed in fratracidal wars. These "tribe wars" continued unabated until well into the 19th century.
In Africa (Nigeria and Muaratina) brutal warlords consolidated their power by rounding up their enemies and selling them en masse to Portugese, Spanish and Arabian slave traders, men with whom the tribal chiefs held court.
In Mexico and South America, the Aztecs' pagan faith required that they appease the Gods, several times a year, in the following manner:
A sacrificial victim, was led to the top of the "sun temple". When he reached the top, a high priest would break the victim's back upon a pointed stone. As the victim lay broken, the high priest would open his chest with surgical precision, remove his beating heart, take a bite from it, and then place it in an offering bowl. After the heart was removed, the high priest and several assiatants would remove the skin from the sacrificial victim in large swaths, so as to preserve its form. The high priest would then wear the skin of the victim and perform a ceremonial dance.
What is the moral of the story?
The cultures that were conquered by the White man were not peaceful cultures. They were inherently destructive, as are all human socieites to varying degrees. White conquest was the catalyst for the collapse of these social systems, but it was not the ultimate cause. Just one man's opinion.
The Aryan Soldat
A
Aryan_Soldat
Guest
Bump for responses.
