EF social experiment.

[needtogetaas]

Obviously most would take the path of least distruction and use the track that would save the most lives. There aren't that many sick fucks that would rather watch 5 people die..

Well, except for needto...

Did the man standing by him self do anything to deserve his life being taken to save the other 5? NO he did not did he. Hell who knows just maybe that one man was famous Doctor/scientist who would have went on to find the cure for AIDS or something like that... Now what? you just sentenced millions to death for decades to come.. He has just as much of a right to live as the others do and I would not stand in as god or what ever and make the choice of taking his life over others.

I am not the universe, mother earth, god or Jesus. If faced with the choice to take one persons life to save others I would not choice because its not my choice to make . Unless its a personal act of heroism in which I am giving my own life to save the lives of others.

Now if I knew the people.. say I knew all 5 people and they were family members of mine.. Lets say they were my kids. Ya Id pull the switch and flip the track in a heart beat. I would only do so out of instant reaction though and the deep inner desire to protect the ones I love.

 

[TheRippedReverend]

Jump off and save yourself unless there's kids then kill dat one unlucky basturd

 

[bigbassturd]

Needto I was just fuckin with ya bro. I see what your point is, I am just saying that most people in that situation would probably be in panic mode and make the split second decision to be involved in the least horrific accident possible.

I don't think most people are going to be thinking too deeply into it in that panic moment, and would choose to spare 5 lives at the expense of one.

 

[mistaballoonhands]

Ok your a dr you have five patients one needs a liver, one a heart, one a kidney, another bone marrow, last a gal bladder. With out these things they all die. You have another healthy patient happens to be a match to all of theses things. Do you kill him to save the others?

One dies but 5 live its the path of least destruction no?

Your arguement is flawed. One does not require a gallbladder.

 

[bigpokey]

Your arguement is flawed. One does not require a gallbladder.

pwnt!

 

[superqt4u2nv]

Your arguement is flawed. One does not require a gallbladder.

LOL ok pic another vital organ smart ass

 

[goin on 4T]

All I see is an avi with nice big boobs. Is she saying something?


Sent from my iPhone using EliteFitness app

 

[WoodyO]

LOL ok pic another vital organ smart ass

Penis

 

[javaguru]

Imagine yourself in a trolley car going down a track with 5 rail workers in front of you. The break on the trolley malfunctions you can't stop the trolley it going to crash into 5 people and kill them. But wait there is a second track with only one worked and you can pull the lever to jump to the track with the one worker on it which will kill just him.

What do you do it's a split second choice make it and provide reason for your answer.

Why do these people not realize a trolley car is hurtling at them with no intention of stopping while the driver is sounding an alarm while at least some of the passengers are probably trying to get their attention?

Maybe killing the five and keeping them from reproducing would benefit humanity because they wouldn't pass on their defective "I can't hear or see a large object hurtling toward me while people are screaming a warning" gene?