Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Duration of your sets?

StealthPower said:
Who was it done by?

The 60% or more is still pretty loose in terms of hypertrophy.

As for crunches and leg raises, why treat them different than your legs in terms of training? Personally heavy weight 4-8 rep range is sufficient in that regards.

Here is a good discussion about speed of movement and tissue damage along with some other neat information about muscle fibers.

http://www.fortifiediron.net/invision/index.php?showtopic=24907

Kc

Thanks for the info and link. I have a question about weighted ab training?

What exercises can I do that invole weighted resistance that focus primarily on abdominals? What is proper placement fo weights (plates?) to do crunches using proper form?
 
I will use bands alot of time for my resistance.

However:

Decline crunchs with a plate accross chest is a good movement.

Decline crunchs with a barbell are just pure murder :)

Basically get creative :)

Kc
 
StealthPower said:
I will use bands alot of time for my resistance.

However:

Decline crunchs with a plate accross chest is a good movement.

Decline crunchs with a barbell are just pure murder :)

Basically get creative :)

Kc

I've forgotten about decline lately! Thanks for the reminder. It's rare I put my benches in a decline position since I don't have any decline movements in my current routine.

Are hanging leg raises primarily a lower ab exercise or quads? I was thinking I could add weights on my legs somehow to add resistance?

I read that article and thread by the way. Man this stuff gets me all confused and wondering if I'm really maximizing my training for hypertrophy. I see results but if it can get better (or faster) results (in regard to hypertrophy) by just tweaking some movements and timing that would be great. I hate to feel like I'm cheating myself out of some secret super-effective proven theory. Problem is no one seems to agree on anything solid! Grrrrh.

Thanks for the info everyone
 
deltreefitness said:
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research says; to stimulate muscle growth, a set needs to last 40-60 seconds.

Just the fact that it says you NEED to have your sets last 40-60 seconds in order to stimulate muscle growth lead me to believe that whomever did the study was on drugs. I've never had a set last 40-60 seconds (unless it was part of a rest/pause), and I'm pretty sure I've stimulated my muscles into growing.
 
BOOEY said:
I've never had a set last 40-60 seconds (unless it was part of a rest/pause), and I'm pretty sure I've stimulated my muscles into growing.

Yeah it's rare that my sets last that long either so I have to agree for the most part. I mean I'm not huge by any means but I've made some nice personal gains that I'm happy with. So I must be doing SOMETHING right. It was posted in concern more with optimizing results. Maybe there is some applicable truth to that could help increase hypertrophy.
 
Along with the previous comments I'd add that a set of heavy squat (single) is not the same as a set of triceps kickbacks

So any generalization seems preposterous
 
Top Bottom