Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Could Arnold=Ronnie

Reverse the question- how Coleman or for that matter many of today's pros would have done 20-30 years ago WITHOUT the massive amounts of drugs they do. Arnold would win safely.
 
Intenceman said:
Reverse the question- how Coleman or for that matter many of today's pros would have done 20-30 years ago WITHOUT the massive amounts of drugs they do. Arnold would win safely.

That is a good point! I never thought of that. Take away GH and synthol and it is a whole new ball game.
 
lincoln said:


That is a good point! I never thought of that. Take away GH and synthol and it is a whole new ball game.

Your right. Add to the take away list: insulin, clen, clomid etc....

Training hasnt changed much in 30 years

Arnold was the greatest ever....
 
arnold is an apple and ronnie is an orange.

bbuniv1.jpg
 
Dozerjay said:
Nobody really mentioned Arnold's mindset . He had to be the best . I believe if he had come up through the ranks in this era he would have still dominated .


EVERY pro BBer has that mindset,especially on the Olympia stage.
It boils down to a genetics game...
 
Lift Chief said:
I totally agree that back when arnold was competing it was about making the human body look its absolute best... in pumping iron he talks about the proportions of his body- he didnt increase the size of a muscle unless he needed to in order to even out his physique... he probably could have been even bigger than he was.

now a days it is about pushing the limits of what is humanly possible. Both pursuits are admirable it is just a personal choice which one you respect more...



Exactly...
 
Top Bottom