Exactly , and if you ask around most people with eyes in their heads will agree that Gunter kicked Ronnie's bloated @ss all over the Olympia stage . So in all probability Arnold would have done the same .calfzilla said:in today's standards arnold would have looked something like gunter
Dozerjay said:
Exactly , and if you ask around most people with eyes in their heads will agree that Gunter kicked Ronnie's bloated @ss all over the Olympia stage . So in all probability Arnold would have done the same .
Yeah there is a reason , it's called being defending champion .calfzilla said:but I think there is a reason into why ronnie got first place
you [/B]
3 Fortunes said:
Paulos said:Arnold's look is visually appealing, while Coleman's is disgusting.
Arnold is my favorite Bodybuilder too, I wish Levrone or Gunter woulda won this year though.
Intenceman said:Reverse the question- how Coleman or for that matter many of today's pros would have done 20-30 years ago WITHOUT the massive amounts of drugs they do. Arnold would win safely.
lincoln said:
That is a good point! I never thought of that. Take away GH and synthol and it is a whole new ball game.
Dozerjay said:Nobody really mentioned Arnold's mindset . He had to be the best . I believe if he had come up through the ranks in this era he would have still dominated .
Lift Chief said:I totally agree that back when arnold was competing it was about making the human body look its absolute best... in pumping iron he talks about the proportions of his body- he didnt increase the size of a muscle unless he needed to in order to even out his physique... he probably could have been even bigger than he was.
now a days it is about pushing the limits of what is humanly possible. Both pursuits are admirable it is just a personal choice which one you respect more...
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










