Sean12 said:
One thing that hasnt been brought up about the bench shirts that im not sure some people realize is that you cant just put on a bench shirt and add 100+ lbs to your bench. You may think it is a truer test of strength to bench without a bench shirt but useing one is apart of powerlifting now. At least equipped powerlifting. If you play a sport wouldnt you use everything possible to help you win? I would.
Sean12
precisely my point.
RS, is it not true that the driver has been taken out of the equation to a large extent because of the evolution of the cars and rules? valentino rossi didn't want to switch to F1 for this reason. sure, the guys have to still battle the same G-forces, but handling the car has become that much easier. there are big differences in cars as well. alonso was in a minardi when he first raced, and didn't win a single point. now he is double world champ in a renault. want to know the secret? it's simple - teams like renault, ferrari, mclaren and williams and to an extent, honda and toyota have much larger budgets and can hire better engineers than teams like minardi and jordan. unfair advantage?
what about other sports - tennis for instance. the ball speeds itself have increased to ridiculous extents over the years just from use of better gear - the balls themselves but more importantly the racquets. are we then going to say that they give an unfair advantage compared to the days of bjorn borg, rod laver, ken rosewall who used wooden racquets? it does come in for mention but not as often. today, you have some scrawny beanpoles serving at over 130mph time after time after time... boris becker who also used alloy racquets but not as advanced as today's and was a pretty big strong guy for a tennis player, couldn't do it as often in his time.
there are more examples - swimming has benefitted from the use of full body suits to improve smooth flow of water over the swimmer's bodies.
there are numerous examples and powerlifting is just another sport where athletes have benefitted from science IMHO.
from what i understand, shirted training and raw training are pretty different, which is why competitive lifters are reluctant to go too heavy without a shirt, partly because they will be shirted in comp anyway, and partly because they wouldn't wanna risk the injury. it should come as no surprise that metal militia training revolves around shirted benching because of the fact that guys have to LEARN (or IMPROVE) how to get more out of their shirts. i just don't see how it's different from other sports. how come no one mentions that mendy has a pretty handy raw bench?
plus if we are going to start discussing how shirts give someone an unfair advantage, why don't we also talk about the use of steroids . despite the fact that they are banned, we all know all pro athletes, irrespective of their sport are using them. this being primarily a forum for discussing AAS, the vast majority of us use the same excuse that powerlifters use. we say "everyone's using it at the top in every sport, so someone who doesn't is at a disadvantage". hence, we condone it. powerlifters say the same thing about shirts. do we say that jesse owens could have run under 10s and beaten today's guys with steroids? no, give him credit for his achievement and give today's guys credit for theirs.