This seems like a "Why is a raven different from a writing desk?" question. One is a tyrannical government violating human rights and the other is just jury duty/pet vaccinations...I'm not going to sit here and say "My god! Population control is JUST LIKE jury duty and pet vaccination laws so I need to be okay with both" lol
When I used the word forced, of course I make exceptions to that

... most people don't live without making some exceptions (except maybe the most extreme libertarian lol) though I don't think anyone needs to be forced by the government to get pet vaccinations either...idk in my head reproduction is a human right. Forced abortions, sterilizations, and that type of invasion of privacy is unethical. In an ideal world such a government shouldn't even be allowed to exist. Those thoughts tend to diminish the value of children and humans in general. This is why we see people caring more about trees, rocks, air and water than people.

I don't see how he could "fully understand and not second-guess" that.