primetime21
Banned
> The following was written by an Arab-American
> journalist, Joseph Farah I've been quiet since Israel erupted in fighting
> spurred by disputes over the Temple Mount. Until
> now, I haven't even bothered to say, "See, I told
> you so." But I can't resist any longer. I feel
> compelled to remind you of the column I wrote just
> a couple weeks before the latest uprising. Yeah,
> folks, I predicted it.
>
> That's OK. Hold your applause. After all, I wish
> I had been wrong. More than 600 people have been
> killed since the current fighting started. And
> for what?
>
> If you believe what you read in most news sources,
> Palestinians want a homeland and Muslims want
> control over sites they consider holy. Simple
> right?
>
> Well, as an Arab-American journalist who has spent
> some time in the Middle East dodging more than my
> share of rocks and mortar shells, I've got to tell
> you that these are just phony excuses for the
> rioting, trouble-making and land-grabbing. Isn't
> it interesting that prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli
> war, there was no serious movement for a
> Palestinian homeland?
>
> "Well, Farah," you might say, "that was before the
> Israelis seized the West Bank and Old Jerusalem."
>
> That's true. In the Six-Day War, Israel captured
> Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem. But they
> didn't capture these territories from Yasser
> Arafat. They captured them from Jordan's King
> Hussein. I can't help but wonder why all these
> Palestinians suddenly discovered their national
> identity after Israel won the war.
>
> The truth is that Palestine is no more real than
> Never-Never Land. The first time the name was
> used was in 70 A.D. when the Romans committed
> genocide against the Jews, smashed the Temple and
> declared the land of Israel would be no more.
> From then on, the Romans promised, it would be
> known as Palestine.
>
> The name was derived from the Philistines, a
> Goliathian people conquered by the Jews centuries
> earlier. It was a way for the Romans to add
> insult to injury. They also tried to change the
> name of Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina, but that
> had even less staying power.
>
> Palestine has never existed--before or since--as
> an autonomous entity. It was ruled alternately by
> Rome, by Islamic and Christian crusaders, by the
> Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by the British after
> World War I. The British agreed to restore at
> least part of the land to the Jewish people as
> their homeland.
>
> There is no language known as Palestinian. There
> is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has
> never been a land known as Palestine governed by
> Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs,
> indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent
> invention), Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc.
>
> Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 percent
> of the Middle East lands. Israel represents
> one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass. But
> that's too much for the Arabs. They want it all.
> And that is ultimately what the fighting in Israel
> is about today. Greed. Pride. Envy.
> Covetousness. No matter how many land concessions
> the Israelis make, it will never be enough.
>
> What about Islam's holy sites? There are none in
> Jerusalem. Shocked? You should be. I don't
> expect you will ever hear this brutal truth from
> anyone else in the international media. It's just
> not politically correct.
>
> I know what you're going to say: "Farah, the Al
> Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem
> represent Islam's third most holy sites."
>
> Not true. In fact, the Koran says nothing about
> Jerusalem. It mentions Mecca hundreds of times.
> It mentions Medina countless times. It never
> mentions Jerusalem. With good reason. There is
> no historical evidence to suggest Mohammad ever
> visited Jerusalem. So how did Jerusalem become
> the third holiest site of Islam?
>
> Muslims today cite a vague passage in the Koran,
> the seventeenth Sura, entitled "The Night
> Journey." It related that in a dream or a vision
> Mohammed was carried by night "from the sacred
> temple to the temple that is most remote, whose
> precinct we have blessed, that we might show him
> our signs...." In the seventh century, some
> Muslims identified the two temples mentioned in
> this verse as being in Mecca and Jerusalem.
>
> And that's as close as Islam's connection with
> Jerusalem gets -- myth, fantasy, wishful thinking.
> Meanwhile, Jews can trace their roots in Jerusalem
> back to the days of Abraham.
>
> The latest round of violence in Israel erupted
> when Likud Party leader Ariel Sharon tried to
> visit the Temple Mount, the foundation of the
> Temple built by Solomon. It is the holiest site
> for Jews. Sharon and his entourage were met with
> stones and threats. I know what it's like. I've
> been there. Can you imagine what it is like for
> Jews to be threatened, stoned and physically kept
> out of the holiest site in Judaism?
>
> So what's the solution to the Middle East mayhem?
> Well, frankly, I don't think there is a man-made
> solution to the violence. But, if there is one,
> it needs to begin with truth. Pretending will
> only lead to more chaos.
>
> Treating a 5,000-year-old birthright backed by
> overwhelming historical and archaeological
> evidence equally with illegitimate claims, wishes
> and wants give diplomacy and peacekeeping a bad
> name."
>
> journalist, Joseph Farah I've been quiet since Israel erupted in fighting
> spurred by disputes over the Temple Mount. Until
> now, I haven't even bothered to say, "See, I told
> you so." But I can't resist any longer. I feel
> compelled to remind you of the column I wrote just
> a couple weeks before the latest uprising. Yeah,
> folks, I predicted it.
>
> That's OK. Hold your applause. After all, I wish
> I had been wrong. More than 600 people have been
> killed since the current fighting started. And
> for what?
>
> If you believe what you read in most news sources,
> Palestinians want a homeland and Muslims want
> control over sites they consider holy. Simple
> right?
>
> Well, as an Arab-American journalist who has spent
> some time in the Middle East dodging more than my
> share of rocks and mortar shells, I've got to tell
> you that these are just phony excuses for the
> rioting, trouble-making and land-grabbing. Isn't
> it interesting that prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli
> war, there was no serious movement for a
> Palestinian homeland?
>
> "Well, Farah," you might say, "that was before the
> Israelis seized the West Bank and Old Jerusalem."
>
> That's true. In the Six-Day War, Israel captured
> Judea, Samaria and East Jerusalem. But they
> didn't capture these territories from Yasser
> Arafat. They captured them from Jordan's King
> Hussein. I can't help but wonder why all these
> Palestinians suddenly discovered their national
> identity after Israel won the war.
>
> The truth is that Palestine is no more real than
> Never-Never Land. The first time the name was
> used was in 70 A.D. when the Romans committed
> genocide against the Jews, smashed the Temple and
> declared the land of Israel would be no more.
> From then on, the Romans promised, it would be
> known as Palestine.
>
> The name was derived from the Philistines, a
> Goliathian people conquered by the Jews centuries
> earlier. It was a way for the Romans to add
> insult to injury. They also tried to change the
> name of Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina, but that
> had even less staying power.
>
> Palestine has never existed--before or since--as
> an autonomous entity. It was ruled alternately by
> Rome, by Islamic and Christian crusaders, by the
> Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by the British after
> World War I. The British agreed to restore at
> least part of the land to the Jewish people as
> their homeland.
>
> There is no language known as Palestinian. There
> is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has
> never been a land known as Palestine governed by
> Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs,
> indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent
> invention), Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc.
>
> Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 percent
> of the Middle East lands. Israel represents
> one-tenth of 1 percent of the landmass. But
> that's too much for the Arabs. They want it all.
> And that is ultimately what the fighting in Israel
> is about today. Greed. Pride. Envy.
> Covetousness. No matter how many land concessions
> the Israelis make, it will never be enough.
>
> What about Islam's holy sites? There are none in
> Jerusalem. Shocked? You should be. I don't
> expect you will ever hear this brutal truth from
> anyone else in the international media. It's just
> not politically correct.
>
> I know what you're going to say: "Farah, the Al
> Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem
> represent Islam's third most holy sites."
>
> Not true. In fact, the Koran says nothing about
> Jerusalem. It mentions Mecca hundreds of times.
> It mentions Medina countless times. It never
> mentions Jerusalem. With good reason. There is
> no historical evidence to suggest Mohammad ever
> visited Jerusalem. So how did Jerusalem become
> the third holiest site of Islam?
>
> Muslims today cite a vague passage in the Koran,
> the seventeenth Sura, entitled "The Night
> Journey." It related that in a dream or a vision
> Mohammed was carried by night "from the sacred
> temple to the temple that is most remote, whose
> precinct we have blessed, that we might show him
> our signs...." In the seventh century, some
> Muslims identified the two temples mentioned in
> this verse as being in Mecca and Jerusalem.
>
> And that's as close as Islam's connection with
> Jerusalem gets -- myth, fantasy, wishful thinking.
> Meanwhile, Jews can trace their roots in Jerusalem
> back to the days of Abraham.
>
> The latest round of violence in Israel erupted
> when Likud Party leader Ariel Sharon tried to
> visit the Temple Mount, the foundation of the
> Temple built by Solomon. It is the holiest site
> for Jews. Sharon and his entourage were met with
> stones and threats. I know what it's like. I've
> been there. Can you imagine what it is like for
> Jews to be threatened, stoned and physically kept
> out of the holiest site in Judaism?
>
> So what's the solution to the Middle East mayhem?
> Well, frankly, I don't think there is a man-made
> solution to the violence. But, if there is one,
> it needs to begin with truth. Pretending will
> only lead to more chaos.
>
> Treating a 5,000-year-old birthright backed by
> overwhelming historical and archaeological
> evidence equally with illegitimate claims, wishes
> and wants give diplomacy and peacekeeping a bad
> name."
>