John you are correct... what I don't understand is how someone who is so "moral" can have the word "ho" and "slut" roll off of his tongue as if it were "good morning".
The worst I said of someone who had these points of view was that they were insecure - which they OBVIOUSLY ARE.
Odd though, the MEN that had points of view that were similar to mine WERE NOT CALLED WHORE, SLUT OR SKANK. Hmmmmmm
I can agree to disagree. If a man (or boy - sorry, 19 IS A BOY)wants to date only one girl at a time then that is his perogative. I did NOT condemn that. I only said that this was not in alignment with my thinking. This is no way, shape, or form implies that my way is the only way - IT IS NOT.
I have succeeded to blow this young man's arguements about how I am a whore, user, deceitful - WHATEVER out of the water with INTELLIGENT discourse. The only replies that I recieved is how HE is MORAL and I AM A SLUT.
Okay - He ain't insecure AT ALL.
And what does who pays for a date or how many people you date at a time have to do with morals? What are we here?... Holy Rollers? PUH-LEASE!
May I ask if the author who subscribes to this reasoning has EVER engaged in FORNICATION?!
