blut wump said:
I view loading as something unfortunate that happens that gets in the way of your workouts and forces you to take a break.
Thanks. That was exactly the viewpoint I was interested in. So you're saying the emphasis is on the workouts (pushing intensity), rather than on getting loaded? I can explain better now that I've started looking at the tonnage (all weights in kg):
Code:
SQUAT BENCH DEAD TONNAGE
Weight Sets Reps Weight Sets Reps Weight Sets Reps
Progress so far:
67 6 5 48 6 6 87 6 5 6348
67 7 5 48 7 6 87 7 5 7406
69 7 5 50 7 6 90 7 5 7665
Projected maxes (64% of projected 1RM):
74 6 5 53 6 6 96 6 5 7008
74 7 5 53 7 6 96 7 5 8176
74 8 5 53 8 6 96 8 5 9344 *
74 9 5 53 9 6 96 9 5 10512
Highest maxes (just under current 5RM, or 78% - 83% of projected 1RM):
90 6 5 70 6 6 125 6 5 8970
90 7 5 70 7 6 125 7 5 10465 **
90 8 5 70 8 6 125 8 5 11960
(As a slight aside, the first thing I noticed from my progress so far, is that adding a set makes far more difference than adding a little to the bar).
The 'Projected maxes' are from my initial calculation of week 4's weights, with a varying number of sets. The row highlighted * indicates what I expect Korte would have you do on W4D3, so I know I ought to be somewhere above that, since I'm not a powerlifter using equipment.
The 'Highest maxes' are what I think I might be able to acheive if I get stronger and more conditioned over the remaining 3 weeks of loading. They're a shade under my current 5RMs.
So, the interesting thing to note is that if I were to stick to Korte's percentages but do more volume than he suggests (because I'm not a competing powerlifter), I might do 9 sets on W4D3, which is a tonnage of 10512kg (that sounds heavy

). Alternatively, if I follow a route where I increase intensity and reduce the sets accordingly, I could do 7 sets near to my current 5RM and get a similar tonnage of 10465kg (marked **) .
Now that I have some numbers, my question becomes easier to understand - should I stick to Korte with high volume, moderate intensity (*) or switch to moderate volume, high intensity (**)? You and Jim took the middle ground with final intensities of 71% to 76%.
As I've stated before, I get the feeling that whilst high volume will give you a much better work capacity, there will be less carryover to a 1RM than training high intensity. From your quote above, if loading is a side-effect that has to be managed, it sounds like you're erring on the side of high intensity, which seems sensible to me.