Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

6'5" or greater yet < 200 lbs appreciation thread.

You do not need more muscle to be as "big" as a shorter guy. That is just nonsense.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using EliteFitness

Yes you do. Tall guys....need more muscle to look "big". You take two guys...one 5'8" and the other 6'5" both 185 lbs, both 10% body fat. Who is going to appear bigger???

It's not nonsense...it's common sense.
 
And you figured that out by looking at people and their physique?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using EliteFitness

holy shit

to put it simply, yes but not in the context I believe you're trying to convey


someone mop him.
 
Longer bones, the same mass of muscle has to be stretched across the elongated volume. Muscles don't appear as large. It's common sense, dude. I, at 6'1" 250 appear less muscular than a 5'7" man with the same LBM and body fat %.
 
Top Bottom