Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Finally! Pictorial proof that PICK3 ain't a Mo!
- Thread starter PICK3
- Start date
actually they don't.
and for whatever reason they have hairy pussies. very hairy. is it a sin to shave down there?
but they are smart and very attractive.. but thats my personal preference, i tend to like fair skinned chicks. Mormon girls are actually encouraged to date outside their faith which is good for us, but expect a lot of weirdness to be exhibited onto you.
where is that dude on here from utah maybe he can chime in on this?
The rich do pay a higher rate than janitors. Income tax for them is about 42%. The janitor would pay the same capital gains tax of 15%.
The bottom 47% should pay. The wealthy already finance the majority of our country. But the poorer people want more for nothing and not to pay anything. All Americans should pay a portion. We penalize wealth and success.
The bottom 47% should pay. The wealthy already finance the majority of our country. But the poorer people want more for nothing and not to pay anything. All Americans should pay a portion. We penalize wealth and success.
Headholio
New member
By law Romney will probably never be forced to release most of his tax records, unless of course he is subpoena'd for some of the shady looking stuff. The question is simply how much will it hurt him, to not allow the American people to properly vet a guy who wants to be President.
Traditional release of tax returns by Candidates:
Sen. Robert Dole, R-Kan., in the 1996 election.- 30 years of tax returns. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., - 20 years
George Romney, in 1968 and Bill Clinton in 1992. - 12 years of tax returns. Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., with 10
In 2000, George W. Bush provided 9
Al Gore - 8
In the 2008 Barack Obama - 7
Hillary Clinton -7
1988 - Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis - 6
since 1980, only two general election candidates have revealed just two years of tax returns. One was Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in 2008 (LOSER) and the other is Mitt Romney (Soon to be LOSER).
Traditional release of tax returns by Candidates:
Sen. Robert Dole, R-Kan., in the 1996 election.- 30 years of tax returns. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., - 20 years
George Romney, in 1968 and Bill Clinton in 1992. - 12 years of tax returns. Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., with 10
In 2000, George W. Bush provided 9
Al Gore - 8
In the 2008 Barack Obama - 7
Hillary Clinton -7
1988 - Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis - 6
since 1980, only two general election candidates have revealed just two years of tax returns. One was Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in 2008 (LOSER) and the other is Mitt Romney (Soon to be LOSER).
Headholio
New member
The top federal rate is 35% Obama suggests 39%, the same as it was under Clinton and lower than it was for most of the 20th century.
Romneys released records showing he paid less than 14% in 2010, 2011. The rich don't pay higher rates than janitors. The Capital Gains laws need to change. Why should you pay more tax to work your ass off all year long, than a guy who simply tells his broker to buy and sell stock?
Capital gains rates were intended to encourage new business investment. The rich don't create anything by trading in stocks and commodities, and it makes no sense that we shield them from paying fair tax on that type of income. That's what I'm talking about when I say change the tax law to favor America, not the rich.
If you are going to take 30% of my money I earned by sweating in a factory all day, then take 30% of the money of the guy who just clicked the "sell" button on his computer.
They should pay, to what end? They do pay - sales tax, payroll tax, social security, state, etc. So you want to eliminate their federal deductions? Why? It would amount to nothing, and disincentivise people to work for low paying jobs. It would hurt children. Its retarded in a thousand ways. Tell me how taking money from low income people helps anyone?
You have been brainwashed. Fat cats are smoking big cigars devising their strategy of convincing people that fighting for the rich is somehow good for America and good for the poor. And you are doing their work for them while they laugh all the way to the bank.
The rich finance the majority of this country you say, but how? by exploiting the natural resources we should all benefit from as citizens. By being fortunate enough to have this countrys economic system and infrastructure that allows them to enrich themselves, and by having a middle class that pays. So the rich should pay for the benefits they have received.
If you don't believe that, you don't believe in America, because that's the way its always been.
You don't have to pay tithing to be a member of the mormon church. Don't all-caps something that isn't true. If you don't really know for sure, then don't say so assuredly.
Tithing is required to recieve a "Temple Recommend" which allows you to attend the temple and participate in the rites.
Tithing is a commandment of God, and has been ever since the time of Adam. Abraham paid his tithes to the High Priest, Melchizedek and that was like 5000 years ago or whatever.
Therefore, if you do no keep the commandments of God, you cannot particiapte in the rites of the temple because you are not worthy by definition.
Upscale suburban area near salt lake....
Lmao, just because you don't realize how the majority of people don't really like gayness you get all bunched up. It's funny. It's all the wussies and bitches that won't admit it to someone else for fear of being ridiculed for it because the gays have PC people in their back pocket already.
Gays didn't vandalize the Church's property for allegedly violating a tax code (which they did NOT).
Marriage is not a legal right to gay people and it never should be. Marriage is for heterosexuals.
Gays can have every single legal benefit under the sun that a married couple has. I am totally fine with that. But, they want to destroy what mariage has been about for millenia, and that is absolutely wrong. Fuck them for trying to do this and having already succeeded.
Alo, I'd like to add that studies show that heterosexual couple homes produce more well-rounded and happy, well-behaved children and grow up in a more positive environment than those that do single homes, gay homes, and re-married homes. The reason being is because they have a mother and father that fill both gender roles properly, which is vital to a healthy upbringing. Gays try to fuck this system right in the ass, pun intended.
actually they don't.
and for whatever reason they have hairy pussies. very hairy. is it a sin to shave down there?
but they are smart and very attractive.. but thats my personal preference, i tend to like fair skinned chicks. Mormon girls are actually encouraged to date outside their faith which is good for us, but expect a lot of weirdness to be exhibited onto you.
where is that dude on here from utah maybe he can chime in on this?
Lmao, it is not a sin to shave your body hahaha.
Lots of mormon chicks are smoking hot. There are also some very ugly ones.
And, I have never heard of Mormon girls being encouraged (not specifically anyways) to date outside of their faith. In fact, they are taught to date men that hold the mormon priesthood worthily and get married in the temple.
As far as hairy pussies, I wouldn't know. I like cawk. lol, jk. I'm sure there are girls that let the forrest grow wild.
Similar threads
- Locked
