This is strawman rhetoric - over simplifying an argument and then beating it down and claiming victory.
........................
Sounds to me, with that statement, that's exactly what you're trying to do.
..........................................
Esters do have an effect on the base molecule to the point where it does affect the timeline of effectiveness of the hormone.
...............................
I never said otherwise.
......................................................
In 1954, a researcher named Reifstein and his colleagues compared an injection of Testosterone Propionate with Testosterone Enanthate, and they found that the injection of testosterone propionate resulted in nitrogen retention of 1.02g/day with a total measurable anabolic activity of 12 days, while the Enanthate version resulted in nitrogen retention of 1.76g/day and had a total measurable anabolic activity of 33 days.
................................................
Very simple explanation for that. Faster acting compounds are "purer" than long acting esters. The ester essentially takes up more "room" so in a sense, there's actually more testosterone in a 100mg shot of prop than in enth. But the difference is nominal over the long run. I might question the nitrogen retention difference stated in that study, but even so, it'd be the difference between and extra 50 grams of protein or so. These days with products like GEAR, that difference can be made up very easily.
..................................................
1. If "testosterone is testosterone" then there would be no effort to make different esters of the hormone. It wouldn't matter, affects would all be the same. This is simply not the case though.
.............................
[COLOR="purple[B]"]You simply are wrong. These drugs weren't designed for bodybuilding purposes.
[/COLOR][/B]
.....................................
2. Accumulation of the hormone within the body will reach a much higher peak with a long ester as opposed to a shorter ester (if the same dosages are run each week). This surely has an effect on anabolism.
..............................
[COLOR="purple"]It's still finite. If esters built up over the course of weeks and months then people on HRT would show higher and higher levels of T in their system and that just isn't the case.
[/COLOR]
...........................................................
3. Test prop and enanthate are not the exact same thing without the intervention of your body breaking down the ester into the usable hormones; which happens at different rates. 400grams of protein in one meal is the same as 400mg protein split equally between 4 meals but the implications of each meal are quite a bit different.
...........................................
[B]
But what if ALL your 400 grams of protein were in one sitting? It would actually be LESS effective, So again, it's splitting hairs and has absolutely NOTHING to do with a longer ester taking longer to "kick in."
[/B]
Hope that clears up the confusion on your part.
..........................