PICK3
New member
I just won $2 on a $1 mega millions lottery ticket investment. %100 ROI FTW!!!!
I didn't win dick
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just won $2 on a $1 mega millions lottery ticket investment. %100 ROI FTW!!!!
I didn't win dick
So eight years after his replacement was inaugurated, Clinton owns the 2008 crash, but 2 1/2 years after he was sworn in, Obama owns the current situation?
Clinton owns the start of the sub-prime bubble.
Bush owns letting it build and not doing enough to stop it sooner.
yes...clinton ABSolutely owns the crash...and everyone since then has just been left holding the same smelly bag of poo...i don't blame obama for any of this shit...however, i do believe that he has elongated the agony by extending unemployment...that one statistic...jobs...has fueled the rollercoaster...ya know why so many people are unemployed?? because they can continue to collect unemployment instead of going back to work...that and they have no ZERO pride...and the sad thing is that when obama finally says no mas, a lot of these lazy, prideless fucks will find that there former employer took this opportunity to get leaner and meaner and they don't need them anymore...that's when the other shoe will drop...and we'll find out what the real unemployment rate is...but, until then? we'll live with the artifically-inflated rate that has been nurtured by the current administration.
1) There is a lot of evidence that Bush tried to stop the scheme.
2) The dems most definitely pushed him back.
3) He still should have tried harder.
It's not fair to call what Bush tried a "token" effort, but he didn't fight it hard enough either. He should have gotten on prime-time TV and taken his case directly to the people.
Well, the fact remains Bush tried to push for regulation. Opposed to his parties rival who started the problem and then were unrelenting with it. Did Bush try hard enough or not? That is up for debate and it is irrelevant. I personally believe Bush had too much on his plate to focus totally on the housing problem. Think about it! He had the worst terrorist attack and the worst natural disaster in America's history on his watch. In all fairness to Bush, I think he did try as hard as he could considering all the other problems he had to deal with. I think you are being a little unfair by saying he should have tried harder.. Seriously, do you really believe telling the American people about the housing crisis would have accomplished anything??? I severly doubt it.. Most Americans do not know what is going on until the ship is sunk..By then, all we can do is salvage the wreckage.. It is easier to be willfully naive because you do not have to accept responsibility. In other words, people don't want to know! Instant gratification supersedes common sense in America. I do not believe for a second it would have made a difference if Bush would have addressed the country every night about the housing crisis..
Anyway, I did not know you had a PhD? What was your dissertation on? I almost went for a PhD, but I heard horror stories about dissertations, so I punked-out!
Most of my EE was small signal work (analog and digital)
you majored in telemetry of your cawk