King Obama makes a "Executive decission" to allow people that are here illegally

[EnderJE]

It always entertains me to hear about people wanting us to stay out of affairs in the middle east. It sounds a lot like code for abandoning our support for Israel.

Let me ask you this: Let's say we decided that on July 1, 2012, we were officially out of the ME. No more support, dollars, diplomacy... nothing. Yet we know multiple Arab nations have committed themselves to the eradication of Israel. At least a couple of countries still consider themselves at war with Israel. So if on July 2, 2012 the Israelis launched a 14-city thermonuclear attack and killed 75% of the ME's Arab population, would you still be OK with our hands-off policy? Should we just let boys be boys?

You know me. No issue. It's the same way that I would prefer people leaving Africa alone.

It sounds like you want to get involved. This seems different from you. Where would the money for this adventure come from?

 

[brownbrown]

but the radical islamic nations like Iran,
Countless videos and speeches have revealed these leaders .

Iran is not a Radical Islam nation. You ever been there? They are heavily westernized.
Yes there are a lot of Iranians that Do not like America. Why? Because they were a democratic government until America propped up a Dictator.
The LEADERSHIP of Iran is radical. The Ayatollah runs shit. A direct result of America.

All those countless videos are from the Dictating leaders of these countries. NOT the people. These leaders are NOT voted in as a result of the peoples ideals.


Just like the N.Korean leader. No one talks about how radical Kin Jun IL/Un was/is, because they cant blame it on Islam.
They just say that they are "crazy". Without pointing out that They are religiously insane.
And you can check that and see what im talking about.

Thats why its wrong Jack.

 

[brownbrown]

No we don't. If you think this is socialist wait and see what happens if Obama wins again ( which he won't). Obama supporters have nothing to stand on anymore. He's indefensible and they have no other weapon but ignorant insults and steering around the topic at hand... But what else is new with liberals??

Do I really have to explain Socialism to you?
I'll give you an example. You pay taxes. Relying on someone else to use said cash to do something for you.

Dude here's a simple read for you

→→Explanation of Socialism←←

 

[dallasboy]

Let's get back on track here.

Odumbo is buying votes. Which is the only way the democrats get votes. Here is how:

1. Racism (everyone is a racist if they don't vote democrat. More common is when dens can't win an argument they call you a racists).

2. Class warfare. The elitist lefties who have millions of dollars themselves want to demonize hard working and risk taking Americans.

3. Union circle jerks. The criminal racketeering job of union money for democrat votes for exchange of the rape of the public treasury (insane salaries and pensions). The private tax payer is waking up to this fraud that had been going on for decades. Even the beloved JFK warned about this. If this was going on in the private sector, we would need to build more prisons.

4. Guberment handouts. 50% do not pay fed taxes. The dems figured out a long time ago, the more peeps on the federal dole, the more votes. Woodrow Wilson was our for socialist President. LBJ is what really fucked us.

 

[brownbrown]

Let's get back on track here.

Odumbo is buying votes. Which is the only way the democrats get votes. Here is how:

1. Racism (everyone is a racist if they don't vote democrat. More common is when dens can't win an argument they call you a racists).

Heresay, and exactly the same as not voting GOP means you're Socialist/Marxist/Communist

2. Class warfare. The elitist lefties who have millions of dollars themselves want to demonize hard working and risk taking Americans.

And the elitist righties aren't spending 10's of millions on Romney? One donor said 100 million is totally possible just from him

3. Union circle jerks. The criminal racketeering job of union money for democrat votes for exchange of the rape of the public treasury (insane salaries and pensions). The private tax payer is waking up to this fraud that had been going on for decades. Even the beloved JFK warned about this. If this was going on in the private sector, we would need to build more prisons.

So the worker cant have a board and negotiate price like the Ceo's board? Lets let the corporations decide what to pay workers.... And see how that works out.

4. Guberment handouts. 50% do not pay fed taxes. The dems figured out a long time ago, the more peeps on the federal dole, the more votes. Woodrow Wilson was our for socialist President. LBJ is what really fucked us.

Corporations are taking 200 billion a year in hadouts, who's that hurt?

your post was hilarious

 

[dallasboy]

5. Illegal immigration votes.

Lets understand what the dems want: They want full control of your lives. No sodas, etc. More taxes to the elite few.

The other piece is this: The dems DO NOT want their voting base to succeed. They have to shove down their throats the same f&&cking story of class warfare, racism, union blowjobs, illegal voted - year after year.

The democrats are like the eight graders who never few up. Gossiping in the hallway and acting like victims instead of leaders.

You can pick out a democrat by looking at them. They are betas and look like they r about to cry. Play the victim role instead of a leader role.

The next revolution will be the majority of this great Country who get tired of the liberal mantras.

 

[simply dave]

Let's get back on track here.

Odumbo is buying votes. Which is the only way the democrats get votes. Here is how:

1. Racism (everyone is a racist if they don't vote democrat. More common is when dens can't win an argument they call you a racists).

2. Class warfare. The elitist lefties who have millions of dollars themselves want to demonize hard working and risk taking Americans.

3. Union circle jerks. The criminal racketeering job of union money for democrat votes for exchange of the rape of the public treasury (insane salaries and pensions). The private tax payer is waking up to this fraud that had been going on for decades. Even the beloved JFK warned about this. If this was going on in the private sector, we would need to build more prisons.

4. Guberment handouts. 50% do not pay fed taxes. The dems figured out a long time ago, the more peeps on the federal dole, the more votes. Woodrow Wilson was our for socialist President. LBJ is what really fucked us.

This doesn't even warrant a response. You my friend are the typical dumbass Umerikun.

Do the rest of us a favor...don't breed and don't vote for GAWD's sake...verstehen sie das?

 

[mrplunkey]

You know me. No issue. It's the same way that I would prefer people leaving Africa alone.

It sounds like you want to get involved. This seems different from you. Where would the money for this adventure come from?

I'm fine with not spending money on Israel. But if we sever ties, it isn't fair to either:

1) ask them to do dirty work for us.

Or

2) bitch if they go on an ass-kicking spree.

 

[simply dave]

George Washington's Farewell Speech...Those here who feel that it's our responsibility/duty to meddle in the affairs of sovereign nations may want to read this and take note. This is also the identical foreign policy that Ron Paul would adopt; hardly a foreign policy based upon isolationism...

Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all...

In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated....

The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim.

As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils. Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.


It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world

Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing

 

[-SD-]

George Washington's Farewell Speech...Those here who feel that it's our responsibility/duty to meddle in the affairs of sovereign nations may want to read this and take note. This is also the identical foreign policy that Ron Paul would adopt; hardly a foreign policy based upon isolationism...

Nah brah, thats outdated, just like the constitution, gotta fuck with it and tinker around with it since its a living breathing document and shit