Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

wtf is 1-test

Status
Not open for further replies.

rjl296

New member
is it a prohormone or something. i been seing this on some boards, but we dont sell this stuff in canada ?
 
It's the latest crappy pro-hormone supplement in a long line of crappy pro-hormone supplements.
 
Probably will be scheduled soon because it does work compared to some of the other pre-cursor crap. Lots of bad sides. :(
 
doublebicep said:
Probably will be scheduled soon because it does work compared to some of the other pre-cursor crap. Lots of bad sides. :(

Just realized this reads wrong. It is not a pre-cursor it actually a steroid.
 
it works well of OTC

no known sides (for me at least) except maybe a little fatigue/edgyness

some morons on another board some how changed it's state and injected it.. must have hurt like hell
 
dude!...there's a lot of ignorant people here...1-test works almost the same as real test in gains and sides....I'm using it, big gains, about 15 pounds, natural test production supressed (expected) and that's it. Any difference?...Maybe with the real crap, you'll gain more weight, obviously only water retention, and you'll get your liver intoxicated with shit.
 
I have before and after shots of 1-test cycle. I liked it. Thought it to work well. Solid gains in 6 weeks.

Scaggs
 
Nelson Montana said:
It's the latest crappy pro-hormone supplement in a long line of crappy pro-hormone supplements.

Maybe it has a good effect on cat receptors. What do you think, Nelson?
 
well don't try it with your own pet...cause in humans already has wonderful good effects...so by logic, you can killa cat with this juice.
 
Nelson Montana said:
It's the latest crappy pro-hormone supplement in a long line of crappy pro-hormone supplements.

And you write books on this stuff? That is scary..

Try looking into the subject before commenting next time, because you do not know what you are talking about!!

- Bill Llewellyn
 
w_llewellyn said:


And you write books on this stuff? That is scary..

Try looking into the subject before commenting next time, because you do not know what you are talking about!!

- Bill Llewellyn

Actually Nelson's characterization of 1-test is very accurate. PH's are the scourge of the supplement industry. But it won’t matter much longer since Congress will put and end to this nonsense soon anyway.
 
ulter said:


Actually Nelson's characterization of 1-test is very accurate. PH's are the scourge of the supplement industry. But it won’t matter much longer since Congress will put and end to this nonsense soon anyway.

You don't know what the fuck you are talking about either, sorry Ulter. 1-test is not even a prohormone..

Pick up a book like Androgens and Anabolic agents from Vida, READ IT, then get back to me. All of you guys knocking 1-test have read NOTHING about it except ads in magazines!
 
Last edited:
I know 1-test is an "almost" steroid and not a PH. But it's just as weak except for the side effects which are just as bad as the ones one might expect from real steroids. So people should spend their money on a "almost" steroid that gives very little in the way of gains, take the same risks in terms of sides, and for what?
It's funny how no one selling these "almost" steroids ever talks about the sides. It's as though they don't exist. But they do don't they Bill?
Just for record we could have sold this shit too. And we still could. But we are more interested in our clients’ well being than any amount of money we'd make on these drugs.
I can't sell a supp KNOWING that there is a very good chance the user will get unwanted sides from it. But you go right ahead.
 
ulter said:
I know 1-test is an "almost" steroid and not a PH. But it's just as weak except for the side effects which are just as bad as the ones one might expect from real steroids. So people should spend their money on a "almost" steroid that gives very little in the way of gains, take the same risks in terms of sides, and for what?
It's funny how no one selling these "almost" steroids ever talks about the sides. It's as though they don't exist. But they do don't they Bill?
Just for record we could have sold this shit too. And we still could. But we are more interested in our clients’ well being than any amount of money we'd make on these drugs.
I can't sell a supp KNOWING that there is a very good chance the user will get unwanted sides from it. But you go right ahead.

It is a good thing you are not selling 1-test, because you don't even know what it is. It is an "almost" steroid? What the fuck is an almost steroid? How can an "almost" steroid not give you results, but give you the same side effects as real steroids (which are exerted via the androgen receptor)? And yes, OBVIOUSLY, there are side effects. You have ZERO idea of what you are talking about.

The only thing that makes it an "almost" steroid in your mind is the fact that it is LEGAL, and therefore CANNOT be a steroid by your logic. READ Ulter. Pick up a book, go to the medical library and READ about 1-testosterone. P L E A S E. You are spreading totally false info, based on your own personal and incorrect assumptions as to what makes a steroid a steroid.
 
Last edited:
ulter said:
Just for record we could have sold this shit too. And we still could. But we are more interested in our clients’ well being than any amount of money we'd make on these drugs.

Read: We missed the boat, big-time.
 
This is one of the funnier threads I have read in awhile.... I can supply anyone here with several hundred personal testimonials of people who are more than satisfied with 1-Test, whether it be transdermal or oral (seriously, all you have to do is ask, Ill bring'em over).

Not sure who mentioned the price of 1-test as being too expensive, dont know where you do your shopping brother, but GNC isnt where its at. You can get a complete, 1-test/4-AD cycle for around $70. Doesnt seem at all expensive to me. I have personally used Molecular's Ether Gels (after many years of AAS use) and had great results from them, by great, I mean better than I assumed. I once had the 'PHs suck, waste of money' attitude, but once I realized this was the year 2003 and many advances have been made, I thought Id give them a try, and Im glad I did.

Gains made from a 1st 1-test cycle is very comparable to that of an AAS cycle. Of course variables like dose, stacking, etc. come in to play, but a basic AAS cycle is what Im comparing.

As for more sides, if you can provide me with multiple documents on the physiological reason why pro hormones give more side effects than whatever you're comparing them with, by all means, post away.
 
YellowJacket said:

Gains made from a 1st 1-test cycle is very comparable to that of an AAS cycle.

.

just go ahead and post what cycles you have done with "recognized" anabolic steroids. so that a fair comparison can be done.

because have seen about 100 posts to the contrary, by people that have used the very topicals and orals that you refer too.
 
william,

semantics.. ulter knows that that 1-t is an androgen. the term almost a steroid is kind of like prohormone and prosteroid (ie there is no such thing) but still used commonly enough.

they are either steroids or not... as to anabolic and androgenic effect.. therein lies the difference.


BTW- having discussed this on end with ulter.. his objection to selling is "1-t and others" is that the sides.. in his opinion, outweigh the value and that he does not wish to be responsible for others use that leads to unanticipated side effects.. whether the user may or may not be aware of potential.

as to the issue that ulter has for many months made clear with respect to the sale of "PH and prosteroids" is that the warnings are inadequate. and that sides outweigh the benefits- a reasonable interpretation of the available data. and the potential sides are unknown (which is very accurate).
 
macrophage69alpha said:


just go ahead and post what cycles you have done with "recognized" anabolic steroids. so that a fair comparison can be done.

because have seen about 100 posts to the contrary, by people that have used the very topicals and orals that you refer too.

My first cycle, 30mgs dianabol ED, 500mgs Enth. (QV) a week, and 400mgs EQ (QV) a week, I gained 17lbs with decent to good nutrition, this was a 10 week cycle. MY first Ph cycle, 1-T Ethergels, (only a 4 weeker) I gained 11lbs with very good nutrition. Of course you'll find me preaching the importance of nutrition beyond AAS, PHs, Etc. But I have yet to understand what about 1-test pisses off so many AAS users....
 
the hatred is readily understood... PH (previously were heavily touted) the sides were excessive and the gains limited. the number of people with gyno from andro and 19-nor use is appalling.

these compounds are even less predictable as there is NO research on them. and there are a lot of people with pretty severe sides (the real issue, IMO, being more that they were not made aware of the potential of these sides..)-- yes some people are aware, but the majority of consumers are not... do you see big disclaimers on the advertising?
 
macrophage69alpha said:
the hatred is readily understood... PH (previously were heavily touted) the sides were excessive and the gains limited. the number of people with gyno from andro and 19-nor use is appalling.

Whoa brother, people still use andro? I didnt even know it was still around, no one here is talking about andro, or 19nor (which is one of the milder PHs) at all. Im speaking on the behalf of 1-test.

these compounds are even less predictable as there is NO research on them. and there are a lot of people with pretty severe sides (the real issue, IMO, being more that they were not made aware of the potential of these sides..)-- yes some people are aware, but the majority of consumers are not... do you see big disclaimers on the advertising?

There are repercussions to everything my friend. AAS, steriods, drinking, laying in the sunlight, flying, etc. Its up to you to know the general ailments that come with the negative effects of products. Now before you say 'its hard to do when they're not listed, or given', then why would you go ahead and use the product? If you deemed it unsafe, would you use it anyway? You dont see 'big disclaimers' on anything. No company in their right mind is going to add 'may cause sudden heart attack, brain damage, etc' on the bottle. Look at ephedrine.

I hate to seem like im trying to refute what you're saying, I agree that a lot of companies have no business dealing with pro hormones, but there are a few out there that are gaining a very respectable reputation, not only for the way they handle their business, but for the potent products they're putting out, and the feedback, testimonials, and free advice via message boards they are giving out. These companies include Avant Labs, BDC Nutrition, Molecular Nutrition, Ergopharms. I see pro hormones like steriods, you can save some $$ and buy the 'cheaper' brand and hope for the best, or you can take the time, spend the money and get the reputable brand and be 99% positive your results will greatly over shadow that bit of acne on your shoulders.
 
YellowJacket said:


Whoa brother, people still use andro? I didnt even know it was still around, no one here is talking about andro, or 19nor (which is one of the milder PHs) at all. Im speaking on the behalf of 1-test.

you asked why people hate PH (which is a false name anyways.. as they are all steroids)...

thats why..

it matters little on whose behalf you speak.. the "legal hormone" supplement find their origins in those products.. and thus carry their stigma (whether accurate or not)...
 
YellowJacket said:

There are repercussions to everything my friend. AAS, steriods, drinking, laying in the sunlight, flying, etc. Its up to you to know the general ailments that come with the negative effects of products. Now before you say 'its hard to do when they're not listed, or given', then why would you go ahead and use the product? If you deemed it unsafe, would you use it anyway? You dont see 'big disclaimers' on anything. No company in their right mind is going to add 'may cause sudden heart attack, brain damage, etc' on the bottle. Look at ephedrine.


anabolic steroids carry those warnings.. they are readily posted all over the net and accompany the product and are available on their website, etc, etc

people, perhaps yourself not among them, have pimped 1-t etc as otherwise(safe and relatively free from side effects with steroid like gains..) (though notably some people have recently changed this position)

if you want 1-t OTC.. thats the way it should be, otherwise you are just trying to make a buck..
 
macrophage69alpha said:


you asked why people hate PH (which is a false name anyways.. as they are all steroids)...

thats why..

it matters little on whose behalf you speak.. the "legal hormone" supplement find their origins in those products.. and thus carry their stigma (whether accurate or not)...

Well if you're saying people hate pro hormones because of andro, then ignorance is bliss I suppose. I suppose in the future the education will be much better than it is now.....

anabolic steroids carry those warnings.. they are readily posted all over the net and accompany the product and are available on their website, etc, etc

people, perhaps yourself not among them, have pimped 1-t etc as otherwise(safe and relatively free from side effects with steroid like gains..) (though notably some people have recently changed this position)

if you want 1-t OTC.. thats the way it should be, otherwise you are just trying to make a buck..

But remember, anabolic steriods are illegal. Those warnings are designed for vet or medical use, not your bodybuilder/weight trainer. Certainly the dosing is much different between the two. The only products I 'pimp' are those that have treated me well, and I only do the pimping when asked what I thought or when someone requests the info.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom