Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why is prop perceived stronger than cyp/enat?

this makes the most sense out of anything
With a 100mg injection this is how much actual testosterone you're getting.

Testosterone (no ester) 100mg
Propionate 83.72mg
Cypionate 69.90mg

Doesn't look like a huge difference but if you're doing a gram a week the difference between prop and cyp is 141mg per week. Over a 12 week cycle that's an additional 1,700mg.
 
No, my statement is completely accurate. Countless times I have read posts from people with the misconception that Prop is 'stronger' simply because it has a shorter acting ester. It sounds as though the original post in this thread was looking to clear up that very point.

Did you read the original post? It specifically asks on a mg for mg basis which is stronger, Prop or Enan. Nothing more, nothing less. It's fine to then provide explanations as to what is what but your Test is Test is simply not correct because this is not just Test we are inejcting. It is attached to an ester and that ester must be accounted for as it does have a bearing on how the parent hormone reacts.


From the original post, it sounds as though the question being asked was surrounded by a belief that PROP was stronger. If anyone is ever quoting/claiming/suggesting that any form of Test is stronger, I always see them claiming it as being Prop/Susp.

Prop will attain peak blood levels faster than Enan or other longer estered tests. Due entirely to the Propionate ester. This also means that the effective half life is shorter, once again showing the effects of the ester as to the delivery of the parent hormone into the blood stream.

With a distinctly shorter period of effect for Prop compared to Enan it translates generally into less water retention for one and obviously the effects of Prop are experienced much more quicker than Enan with days compared to weeks. So on a 10 week cycle as an example if your blood levels, training intensity, libido and strength are evident from the first few days of injection with Prop compared to the 3-5 weeks for Enan do you still think you can say test is test when we are talking specifically about prop and enan?

From my experience, people view the 'stronger' compound as the one which delivers noticeable gains in the shortest period of time, regardless of how soon the peak is arrived at and maintained.

Prop will do this over Enth, because of the shorter acting ester. Hence the misconception that Prop is 'stronger' than Enth.

Well like you those people have a misunderstanding and are incorrect as I have pointed out here.


You're over-analyzing. My point here was that the test within Test Prop is the same as the Test within Test Enth. I'm trying to make the point that TEST itself - pure testosterone - is TEST. The ester is a by product used for delivery. It doesn't aid in additional strength. It simply dictates the length of time it takes for delivery/bio-availability to occur.

Yes, Prop/Enth will contain different quantities of the actual Test, which is why I am leveling the playing field by being hypothetical about dosages of TEST (The actual HORMONE) being the same.

I'm not over analyzing at all, if anything your attempting to over simply and not really focusing on the facts because as I have taken pains to point out you cannot state test is test when we are talking specifically about depot steroids because the ester does make a difference. It is not simply Test we are injecting here, it is test attached to an ester. Even in the case of Suspension where the test component is higher again than that of prop you will see marked differences in the actions it delivers.

Suspesnion again is another example where differences occur as has been quoted here. It contains a full component of Testosterone per mg as there is no ester to be accounted for in the overall weight so how do you explain the marked differences with this Test if in fact Test is Test. Powerlifters regularly use Suspension before meets or when attempting big lifts because of the immediate strength and aggression it provides.


Too big of an assumption for me to buy in to. 'Should be none' is a fragile statement when talking about hormones. Everyone reacts differently. Stable blood levels doesn't always equal the same reaction all cycle-long.

Once more your lack of understanding is at play here and you have little faith in the science of esters which in fact are remarkable in their accuracy and ability to provide stable blood levels. This is well documented and the statement everyone reacts differently is very wrong when talking about the actions of esters.

Bottom line - esters aside, Test is Test. 'Strength' is both dictated and misconceived by the dosage and ester.

I think we have now covered this and shown it to be not factual in any way.
 
This is, every book that you read would probably explain how one test is better than the other and talk about the differences...but when you actually do it, let's be real, the only difference is that one is a long ester and one is a short ester....other than that, i havent noticed any differences in strength...more water retention with enanthate and cyp but thats pretty much it
 
Here this might help, from another one of my posts.
Testosterone Ester Report


One of the most misunderstood subjects in the world of steroids is the ester--the mechanism by which injectable esterified steroids like testosterone cypionate, testosterone enanthate, and Sustanon work. If you take a quick look around the Internet you will probably find countless articles that consider one form of a steroid far more effective than another. Arguments over the superiority of cypionate to enanthate, or Sustanon to all other testosterones are of course very common. Such arguments are in all practicality, baseless. In this report we'll take an authoritative look at the ester and what specifically it does to a steroid.

WHAT AN ESTER IS, AND HOW IT WORKS

I'm sure that if you have taken an interest in anabolic steroids you have noticed the similarities on the labeling of many drugs. Let's look at testosterone for example. One can find compounds like testosterone cypionate, enanthate, propionate, heptylate; caproate, phenylpropionate, isocaproate, decanoate, acetate, the list goes on and on. In all such cases the parent hormone is testosterone, which had been modified by adding an ester (enanthate, propionate etc.) to its structure. The following question arises: What is the difference between the various esterified versions of testosterone in regards to their use in bodybuilding?

An ester is a chain composed primarily of carbon and hydrogen atoms. This chain is typically attached to the parent steroid hormone at the 17th carbon position (beta orientation), although some compounds do carry esters at position 3 (for the purposes of this article it is not crucial to understand the exact position of the ester). Esterification of an injectable anabolic/androgenic steroid basically accomplishes one thing; it slows the release of the parent steroid from the site of injection. This happens because the ester will notably lower the water solubility of the steroid, and increase its lipid (fat) solubility. This will cause the drug to form a deposit in the muscle tissue, from which it will slowly enter into circulation as it is picked up in small quantities by the blood. Generally, the longer the ester chain, the lower the water solubility of the compound, and the longer it will take to for the full dosage to reach general circulation.

Slowing the release of the parent steroid is a great benefit in steroid medicine, as free testosterone (or other steroid hormones) previously would remain active in the body for a very short period of time (typically hours). This would necessitate an unpleasant daily injection schedule if one wished to maintain a continuous elevation of testosterone (the goal of testosterone replacement therapy). By adding an ester, the patient can visit the doctor as infrequently as once per month for his injection, instead of having to constantly re-administer the drug to achieve a therapeutic effect. Clearly without the use of an ester, therapy with an injectable anabolic/androgen would be much more difficult.

Esterification temporarily deactivates the steroid molecule. With a chain blocking the 17th beta position, binding to the androgen receptor is not possible (it can exert no activity in the body). In order for the compound to become active the ester must therefore first be removed. This automatically occurs once the compound has filtered into blood circulation, where esterase enzymes quickly cleave off (hydrolyze) the ester chain. This will restore the necessary hydroxyl (OH) group at the 17th beta position, enabling the drug to attach to the appropriate receptor. Now and only now will the steroid be able to have an effect on skeletal muscle tissue. You can start to see why considering testosterone cypionate much more potent than enanthate makes little sense, as your muscles are seeing only free testosterone no matter what ester was used to deploy it.

ACTIONS OF DIFFERENT ESTERS

There are many different esters that are used with anabolic/androgenic steroids, but again, they all do basically the same thing. Esters vary only in their ability to reduce a steroid's water solubility. An ester like propionate for example will slow the release of a steroid for a few days, while the duration will be weeks with a decanoate ester. Esters have no effect on the tendency for the parent steroid to convert to estrogen or DHT (dihydrotestosterone: a more potent metabolite) nor will it effect the overall muscle-building potency of the compound. Any differences in results and side effects that may be noted by bodybuilders who have used various esterified versions of the same base steroid are just issues of timing. Testosterone enanthate causes estrogen related problems more readily than Sustanon, simply because with enanthate testosterone levels will peak and trough much sooner (1-2 week release duration as opposed to 3 or 4). Likewise testosterone suspension is the worst in regards to gyno and water bloat because blood hormone levels peak so quickly with this drug. Instead of waiting weeks for testosterone levels to rise to their highest point, here we are at most looking at a couple of days. Given an equal blood level of testosterone, there would be no difference in the rate of aromatization or DHT conversion between different esters. There is simply no mechanism for this to be possible.

There is however one way that we can say an ester does technically effect potency; it is calculated in the steroid weight. The heavier the ester chain, the greater is its percentage of the total weight. In the case of testosterone enanthate for example, 250mg of esterified steroid (testosterone enanthate) is equal to only 180mg of free testosterone. 70mgs out of each 250mg injection is the weight of the ester. If we wanted to be really picky, we could consider enanthate slightly MORE potent than cypionate (I know this goes against popular thinking) as its ester chain contains one less carbon atom (therefore taking up a slightly smaller percentage of total weight). Propionate would of course come out on top of the three, releasing a measurable (but not significant) amount more testosterone per injection than cypionate or enanthate.

IN CONCLUSION

While the advent of esters certainly constitutes an invaluable advance in the field of anabolic steroid medicine, clearly you can see that there is no magic involved here. Esters work in a well-understood and predictable manner, and do not alter the activity of the parent steroid in any way other than to delay its release. Although the lure surrounding various steroid products like testosterone cypionate, Sustanon, Omnadren etc. certainly makes for interesting conversation, realistically it just amounts to misinformation that the athlete would be better off ignoring. Testosterone is testosterone and anyone who is going to tell you one ester form of this (or any) hormone is much better than another one should do a little more research, and a lot less talking.

ESTER PROFILES

Sustanon: The "king" of testosterone blends.
The four different testosterone esters in this product certainly look appealing to the consumer, there is no denying that. But for the athlete I think it is all just a matter of marketing (Hell, why buy one ester when you can get four?). In clinical situations I can see some strong uses for it. If you were undergoing testosterone replacement therapy for example, you would probably find Sustanon a much more comfortable option than testosterone enanthate. You would need to visit the doctor less frequently for an injection, and blood levels should be more steadily maintained between treatments. But for the bodybuilder who is injecting 4 ampules of Sustanon per week, there is no advantage over other testosterone products. In fact, the high price tag for Sustanon usually makes it a very poor buy in the face of cheaper testosterone enanthate/cypionate. Bodybuilders should probably stop looking at the four ester issue, and stick with totals (Sustanon is just a 250mg testosterone ampule). Were enanthate to be available for say $10 per amp of 250mg, and Sustanon priced nearly double that, buying the Sustanon would be like throwing money away. If you could get nearly double the milligram amount for the same price with enanthate, this is the better product to go with hands down. Leave the high priced stuff for the guys who don't know any better.

Acetate: Chemical Structure C2H4O2.

Also referred to as Acetic Acid; Ethylic acid; Vinegar acid; vinegar; Methanecarboxylic acid. Acetate esters delay the release of a steroid for only a couple of days. Contrary to what you may have read, acetate esters do not increase the tendency for fat removal. Again, there is no known mechanism for it to do so. This ester is used on oral primobolan tablets (metenolone acetate), Finaplix (trenbolone acetate) implant pellets, and occasionally testosterone.

Propionate: Chemical Structure C3H6O2.

Also referred to as Carboxyethane; hydroacrylic acid; Methylacetic acid; Ethylformic acid; Ethanecarboxylic acid; metacetonic acid; pseudoacetic acid; Propionic Acid. Propionate esters will slow the release of a steroid for several days. To keep blood levels from fluctuating greatly, propionate compounds are usually injected two to three times weekly. Testosterone propionate and methandriol dipropionate (two separate propionate esters attached to the parent steroid methandriol) are popular items.

Phenylpropionate: Chemical Structure C9H10O2.

Also referred to as Propionic Acid Phenyl Ester. Phenylpropionate will extend the release of active steroid a few days longer than propionate. To keep blood levels even, injections are given at least twice weekly. Durabolin is the drug most commonly seen with a phenylpropionate ester (nandrolone phenylpropionate), although it is also used with testosterone in Sustanon and Omnadren.

Isocarpoate: Chemical Structure C6H12O2.

Also referred to as Isocaproic Acid; isohexanoate; 4-methylvaleric acid. Isocaproate begins to near enanthate in terms of release. The duration is still shorter, with a notable hormone level being sustained for approximately one week. This ester is used with testosterone in the blended products Sustanon and Omnadren.

Caproate: Chemical Structure C6H12O2.

Also referred to as Hexanoic acid; hexanoate; n-Caproic Acid; n-Hexoic acid; butylacetic acid; pentiformic acid; pentylformic acid; n-hexylic acid; 1-pentanecarboxylic acid; hexoic acid; 1-hexanoic acid; Hexylic acid; Caproic acid. This ester is identical to isocarpoate in terms of atom count and weight, but is laid out slightly different (Isocaproate has a split configuration, difficult to explain here but easy to see on paper). Release duration would be very similar to isocaproate (levels sustained for approximately one weak), perhaps coming slightly closer to enanthate due to its straight chain. Caproate is the slowest releasing ester used in Omnadren, which is why most athletes notice more water retention with this compound.

Enanthate: Chemical Structure C7H14O2.

Also referred to as heptanoic acid; enanthic acid; enanthylic acid; heptylic acid; heptoic acid; Oenanthylic acid; Oenanthic acid. Enanthate is one of the most prominent esters used in steroid manufacture (most commonly seen with testosterone but is also used in other compounds like Primobolan Depot). Enanthate will release a steady (yet fluctuating as all esters are) level of hormone for approximately 10-14 days. Although in medicine enanthate compounds are often injected on a bi-weekly or monthly basis, athletes will inject at least weekly to help maintain a uniform blood level.

Cypionate: Chemical Structure C8H14O2.

Also referred to as Cyclopentylpropionic acid, cyclopentylpropionate. Cypionate is a very popular ester here in the U.S., although it is scarcely found outside this region. Its release duration is almost identical to enanthate (10-14 days), and the two are likewise thought to be interchangeable in U.S. medicine. Althletes commonly hold the belief than cypionate is more powerful than enanthate, although realistically there is little difference between the two. The enanthate ester is in fact slightly smaller than cypionate, and it therefore releases a small (perhaps a few milligrams) amount of steroid more in comparison.

Decanoate: Chemical Structure C10H20O2.

Also referred to as decanoic acid; capric acid; caprinic acid; decylic acid, Nonanecarboxylic acid. The Decanoate ester is most commonly used with the hormone nandrolone (as in Deca-Durabolin) and is found in virtually all corners of the world. Testosterone decanoate is also the longest acting constituent in Sustanon, greatly extending its release duration. The release time with Decanoate compounds is listed to be as long as one month, although most recently we are finding that levels seem to drop significantly after two weeks. To keep blood levels more uniform, athletes (as they have always known to do) will follow a weekly injection schedule.

Undecylenate: Chemical Structure C11H20O2.

Also referred to as Undecylenic acid; Hendecenoic acid; Undecenoic acid. This ester is very similar to decanoate, containing only one carbon atom more. Its release duration is likewise very similar (approximately 2-3 weeks), perhaps extending a day or so past that seen with decanoate. Undecylenate seems to be exclusive to the veterinary preparation Equipoise (boldenone undecylenate), although there is no reason it would not work well in human-use preparations (Equipoise certainly works fine for athletes). Again, weekly injections are most common.

Undecanoate: Chemical Structure C11H22O2.

Also referred to as Undecanoic Acid; 1-Decanecarboxylic acid; Hendecanoic acid; Undecylic acid. Undecanoate is not a commonly found ester, and only appears to be used in the nandrolone preparation Dynabolan, and oral testosterone undecanoate (Andriol). Since this ester is chemically very similar to undecylenate (it is only 2 hydrogen atoms larger), it has a similar release duration (approximately 2-3 weeks). Although this ester is used in the oral preparation Andriol, there is no reason to believe it carries any properties unique of other esters. Andriol in fact works very poorly at delivering testosterone, bolstering the idea that oral administration is not the idea use of esterified androgens.

Laurate: Chemical structure C12H24O2.

Also referred to as Dodecanoic acid, laurostearic acid, duodecyclic acid, 1-undecanecarboxylic acid, and dodecoic acid. Laurate is the longest releasing ester used in commercial steroid production, although longer acting esters do exist. Its release duration would be closer to one month than the other esters listed above, although realistically we are probably to expect a notable drop in hormone level after the third week. Laurate is exclusively found in the veterinary nandrolone preparation Laurabolin, perhaps seen as slightly advantageous over a decanoate ester due to a less frequent injection schedule. Again athletes will most commonly inject this drug weekly, no doubt in part due to its low strength (25mg/ml or 50mg/ml).


http://www.musclechat.co.uk/images/statusicon/user_offline.gif http://www.musclechat.co.uk/images/buttons/quote.gif
 
Testosterone is testosterone and anyone who is going to tell you one ester form of this (or any) hormone is much better than another one should do a little more research, and a lot less talking.

Oh I like this line! ;)
 
If youve tried both prop and cyp/enat did you think prop was stronger on a milligram per milligram basis and if so why is that?

I think it's in people's head cause it kicks in faster.
It is very hard to judge individual steroid effectiveness when taking multiple at a time.
We used to have an old saying, TEST=TEST=TEST.
 
Oh I like this line! ;)

Of course you would but the whole "article" is just that, an article. There is no science or references to support this individuals theory and is likely written by someone with no steroid experience. I have tons of it, utilizing all different esters so I am speaking from a standpoint of actual knowledge on the subject and not just parroting something spewed across message boards.

You still haven't explained why the anecdotal evidence of anyone with experience running cycles of depot steroids shows vastly different results from different testosterone esters. Again why is it that Prop is preferred for cutting? Why is it that Enan is preferred for bulking? If test was test there would not be these proven differences with prop providing less water retention, less detrimental effects on lipid profiles, less aromatization to estrogen, less reported cases of gyno and less weight gain overall than a comparative mg for mg injection schedule against Enan. This is fact.

Perhaps look at some science for even further conclusive evidence that Test is not Test when we are referring to depot steroids of different ester lenngths.

Pharmacokinetics and degree of aromatization rathe...[J Androl. 2003 Sep-Oct] - PubMed Result

Pharmacokinetics and degree of aromatization rather than total dose of different preparations determine the effects of testosterone

You can read the above 2003 study abstract by following the link but in brief synopsis what they did was inject primates with 3 different versions of esterfied Test allowing for exact amounts of Test to be delivered accounting for the ester. They reported differences in suppression, difference in lipid profiles, differences in conversion to estradiol and differences in metabolism with each of the esters and lastly and most importantly stating these differences have to be accounted for in men receiving hormonal treatment.

here is a further study -

Studies comparing the effects of certain testoster...[J Am Geriatr Soc. 1954] - PubMed Result

Studies comparing the effects of certain testosterone esters in man

What they found in this study was specifically with injections of Test Prop and Test Enan that there were marked differences in the levels of nitrogen retention with Prop showing 1.02g/day and a total measurable anabolic activity of 12 days, while the Enan version resulted in nitrogen retention of 1.76g/day and had a total measurable anabolic activity of 33 days. Again this translates directly to any anecdotal evidence worth listening to of those with any serious experience with the use of depot steroids.

I could go on and provide even further studies but I tend to think I have made my point. Test IS NOT Test when talking about differences between esterfied Testosterone and again the conclusions from these studies already presented is right in line with real world experiences.
 
Top Bottom