That is patently false. As long as there's misunderstanding there, there'll never be an agreement. That's like saying it doesn't matter if you smoke one cigarette a day for 2 weeks or 2 packs a day for 10 years -- the result is the same as long as you stop smoking before contracting cancer. Not so. There are long term effects to anything and shutting down hormonal production is one of them. And besides, T doesn't "shut down" entirely after a few weeks if dosages are same. You'll be suppressed, but not shut down.
you cut off the bold before it continued with "...in my experience"... i have never taken any longer myself to recover from a longer cycle than a short one, any difference has been negligable for me...
so is the OP going to be 'shut down' at 6 weeks? because that is the proposed cycle length, thus the applicable variable...
bottom line, what i wrote after that is all that really matters anyways... weather or not the gains made from several short cycles vs. one long cycle giving the same end results have the same maintenance requirements...