i got your pole right here broWootoom said:poll? not yours though
both were bad, no question.Wootoom said:this could start fights, i would say the world trade center because it involved terrorists and i think war is gonna end this world and Katrina was a natrual disaster even though it was also as bad in way, either way they were both bad
Lestat said:both were bad, no question.
but the 9/11 got so much support. The average "victim" got a couple million.
The average victim in new orleans doesn't live there anymore and is basically as poor as before.
Lestat said:both were bad, no question.
but the 9/11 got so much support. The average "victim" got a couple million.
The average victim in new orleans doesn't live there anymore and is basically as poor as before.
that is extremely sad. It should be at least proportional to the number of people affected, if not MORE for Katrina since it literally destoyed every earthly posession that many of these people had.Ludendorf said:i would assume gov't monies given to katrina victims doubled what was given to 9/11 victims
Lestat said:that is extremely sad. It should be at least proportional to the number of people affected, if not MORE for Katrina since it literally destoyed every earthly posession that many of these people had.
lmao. bro, how many of the katrina victims do you think had a stock portfolio?Ludendorf said:so do you, brian lestat, feel obligated to help?
if so then donate time and/or money
i totally guessed on the gov't monies...i could be way off
I'm not as generous and feel little obligation
i doubt the majority of those folks would do shit for me if
lake superior flooded my home. and i don't expect them to.
and that's why one has a savings and stock portfilio (sp), too handle business when things go bad
Lestat said:lmao. bro, how many of the katrina victims do you think had a stock portfolio?
Would they do shit for you? probably not.
we're talking about poor people man.
I helped in a very small way for both 9/11 and katrina, i wish I could take the 9/11 money back though and give it to katrina. Its events like that which really expose the dirty underbelly of this country. As time goes on it becomes more and more apparent how people really don't give a shit about the poor in this country, people somehow think it is just their own fault.
I am where I am today because I was born into a white, middle class, christian family. The road was paved for me to succeed in high school, and then college, and now my career. I'm not so naieve and ignorant to think that EVERYONE has the same opportunities afforded to me. I didn't have the same opportunities as Warren Buffets children, the New Orleans population in general doesn't have a 10th of the means that you or I have.
I'm not saying people need hand outs either, but if we are giving them out, at least give them out fairly and to those who have REAL NEED.
You are telling me that a woman who lost her husband in the trade centers needs a couple of million dollars to live the rest of her life, yet there are people in katrina that couldn't even qualify for the $2000 ATM card! Its pathetic and makes me ashamed of my countrymen.
I'm not guitly about it at all. It disgusts me when an employer complains that they have to pay their janitors minimum wage and health benefits.Ludendorf said:it is fucked up, the cash value of a life/soul
it is also fucked up how much white guilt you have over being successful.
maybe you should donate more money, stop living such an exciting life, because you appear to feel real guilty about it
Ludendorf said:so do you, brian lestat, feel obligated to help?
if so then donate time and/or money
i totally guessed on the gov't monies...i could be way off
I'm not as generous and feel little obligation
i doubt the majority of those folks would do shit for me if
lake superior flooded my home. and i don't expect them to.
and that's why one has a savings and stock portfilio (sp), too handle business when things go bad
how was 9/11 a bigger tradegy overall? It involved far less people. More aid came in.rocky_road said:Great thread and interesting discussion. So much more profound than the average C&C thread. Lestat brings up good points yet "Ludendorf" ? does also.
9/11 was definetely the bigger tragedy overall, but Hurricane Katrina was perhaps dealt with less sucessfully, making it's after-effects more tragic than the after-effects of 911.
Lestat said:both were bad, no question.
but the 9/11 got so much support. The average "victim" got a couple million.
The average victim in new orleans doesn't live there anymore and is basically as poor as before.
lmao. typical response.ItalianMuscle27 said:The 9/11 attacks fo sure.. Both were terrible, but you cant blame mother nature.. She cant be predicted!
"To date, the average payout from the fund has been $1.8 million, with the highest award, about $7.9 million, going to one of the badly injured victims who survived."hanselthecaretaker said:Where's your support for that statement?
people like you need to be weeded out for good.FNBS said:not even close 911 was a tragedy... katrina was like weeding out the few
Lestat said:people like you need to be weeded out for good.
Lestat said:"To date, the average payout from the fund has been $1.8 million, with the highest award, about $7.9 million, going to one of the badly injured victims who survived."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/16/national/main593715.shtml
Tell me which katrina victims were compensated in the millions, let alone nearly 8 million?
People need to wake the fuck man. There was a SCIENTOLOGY center in NEW YORK CITY that got 300,000.00 alone, THAT is the fucking tradegy.
Israel went into Lebanon and fucked shit up and Hezbolah, a terrorist group handed out cash to those people who lost their homes so they could rebuild.
What do we do for katrina? shitty ATM cards. Is that going to rebuild a home?
Lestat said:lmao. typical response.
you can't blame mother nature?
how about the levy engineers?
Lestat said:Also the insurance situation in New Orleans was bullshit. People who had hurricane insurance were denied claims because they said the damage was from a flood. Those with flood insurance were denied claims because they would say the damage was from wind! People got the run around and them some. Then after all was said and done, they would deduct the value of their "land" from the payout so in many cases people got checks for a couple of hundred dollars despite losing their entire home and all belongings!
hes a fuckin softy nowneedtogetas said:the downfall of lestat and the bomb squad.
the point i'm making is that each individual should prepare for the worstbluepeter said:lol at savings and stock portfolios.
what about the french and england gess we all forget about them attacking us that far back.superqt4u2nv said:9/11 was far worse it was the first ever attack on main land American soil that is a pretty big fucking deal IMO.
Katrina although tragic is not out of the ordinary huricans happen all the time all over the world and many people die most poor that is not a something that is unique America. I just think that most were suprised by the goverments handeling of things and that is why so many people view it as so very traggic.
Lestat said:I'm glad this thread opened someone's eyes to a different way of thinking.
I am continually amazed at how conservative this board is, I guess being born and raised in California gives me a different perspective that the rest of the country doesn't really respect so much.
I see this country as an awesome place, so full of opportunity, wealth, luxury, education, intelligence, character, culture, and much more. Its rich with everything, yet we still have to fight bitterly to prevent a rapid consolidation of wealth that once done, can never be undone.
I envison a national where there is no poor. There will always be the elite, the more the better as far as I am concerned, but we should be judged by the quality of life of our poorest citizens, not by the quality of life of our richest. Do we really want to live in Nation like so many undeveloped ones where there is a royal (rich) family or heritage that basically controls all the money and the power in the entire nation?
Ludendorf said:the point i'm making is that each individual should prepare for the worst
hence saving loot and having ins
Ludendorf said:this sounds like a budding socialist speech from an elitist californian
lol @ fight wealth consolidation, lenin felt the same way
you are the rich mofo on this thread, why don't you give your own money away to help these poor folks? don't volunteer my money away
bluepeter said:I understood the point. I just found it laughable that you seem to think that everyone has the means to sock a bunch of money away and have stock portfolios. That's not reality. I agree people need to be prepared but there is only so much someone working their ass off for minimum wage can do.
Ludendorf said:it comes down to this: collective responsibillity vs individual responsibillity.
bluepeter said:I agree. However, I believe we all have a responsibility to help those less fortunate in the face of a catastrophe like that. There are always going to be those that do not have the advantages or the means to do what seems normal and natural to others.
Ludendorf said:the question is: should help be manadtory, or on a volunteer basis?
it sickens me knowing that lestat is so eager to forfite (sp) my money when I'm scrapping by and he is big timing in san diego
a creed said:Lestat - why post something that you KNEW would divide this board - (well somewhat)
IMHO - you don't make THAT much $$$ - I'll easily mach wages with you, but this is the first time i've brought this up.
I think you're cool and all, but i would like to see a pol/post question that doesn't end up with you letting everyone know how "well-off" you are (whether you do directly or indirectly) You're not wealthy enough to feel bad about how much you make.
Just my 2cents
bluepeter said:Depends what help you are referring to. Cash handouts after the fact? Voluntary. Tax money spent wisely so that cities have the appropriate planning and infrastructure to take care of those of limited means in disaster situations? Mandatory.
Lestat said:lmao. bro, how many of the katrina victims do you think had a stock portfolio?
Would they do shit for you? probably not.
we're talking about poor people man.
I helped in a very small way for both 9/11 and katrina, i wish I could take the 9/11 money back though and give it to katrina. Its events like that which really expose the dirty underbelly of this country. As time goes on it becomes more and more apparent how people really don't give a shit about the poor in this country, people somehow think it is just their own fault.
I am where I am today because I was born into a white, middle class, christian family. The road was paved for me to succeed in high school, and then college, and now my career. I'm not so naieve and ignorant to think that EVERYONE has the same opportunities afforded to me. I didn't have the same opportunities as Warren Buffets children, the New Orleans population in general doesn't have a 10th of the means that you or I have.
I'm not saying people need hand outs either, but if we are giving them out, at least give them out fairly and to those who have REAL NEED.
You are telling me that a woman who lost her husband in the trade centers needs a couple of million dollars to live the rest of her life, yet there are people in katrina that couldn't even qualify for the $2000 ATM card! Its pathetic and makes me ashamed of my countrymen.
VERY WELL SAID!!!Y_lifter said:As for the loss of life piece of the tragedy, which one was the most avoidable
Katrina was seen coming DAYS ahead of time.
AirPlanes crashing into the Towers on that day was not
The real tragedy IMO was "everyone" including the vics not doing enough
about what they Saw and Knew was coming.
Lestat said:both were bad, no question.
but the 9/11 got so much support. The average "victim" got a couple million.
The average victim in new orleans doesn't live there anymore and is basically as poor as before.
By Rush Limbaugh:
I think the vast differences in compensation between victims of the September 11 casualty and those who die serving our country in Uniform are profound. No one is really talking about it either, because you just don't criticize anything having to do with September 11. Well, I can't let the numbers pass by because it says something really disturbing about the
entitlement mentality of this country. If you lost a family member in the September 11 attack, you're going to get an average of $1,185,000. The range is a minimum guarantee of $250,000, all the way up to $4.7 million.
If you are a surviving family m ember of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable.
Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.
Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers.
We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.
You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing. Make sense?
However, our own U.S. Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system. (?)
If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm's way receive a pension of $15,000 per month.
I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and daughters who are now fighting .
hotzie said:9/11 was a lot worse of a tragedy. katrina could have been prevented.
bluepeter said:I understood the point. I just found it laughable that you seem to think that everyone has the means to sock a bunch of money away and have stock portfolios. That's not reality. I agree people need to be prepared but there is only so much someone working their ass off for minimum wage can do.
Ludendorf said:is it a strange concidence that most of the katrina voters are not american citizens??

Y_lifter said:The Gulf Coast after Katrina wasn't coined the Worst Natural disaster in known
History because it was just "Sort a bad".
Mr. dB said:Katrina certainly had a direct affect on more people's lives, and left a much larger mess to be cleaned up, but what was the death toll? 3000+ people died on the spot at the WTC, Pentagon, and Pennsylvania.
Why do they need to be ranked? Can't we just say that they both sucked?
As for the "Katrina could have been prevented" suggestion, tell that to the people of the Mississippi and Alabama Gulf Coast.
Questions still remain over how many people died after Hurricane Katrina as well as the whereabouts of all of the evacuees. The official death toll stands at about 1,300 but thousands of people are still reported missing. Two weeks ago USA Today reported the whereabouts of 6,600 people reported missing have not been determined. And this past weekend Newsday reported the missing includes 1,300 children.
Mr. dB said:"Worst Natural disaster in known History"???????
Please. The tsunami was worse. Hundreds of thousands died.
Or Krakatoa.
The Shadow said:"choose carefully"
LOL - like we should be "scared" to vote
Frisky said:IN AMERICA
Mr. dB said:"Worst Natural disaster in known History"???????
Please. The tsunami was worse. Hundreds of thousands died.
Or Krakatoa.
Austin316 said:9/11 by far, people in NO had time to get out, they at least had a chance, a lot of what could of been avoided was not because of stupidity...
Y_lifter said:My 3 years in high school were an awesome tragedy..
Where would you rank that ?
Frisky said:stupidity... or ...... really... I'd say most were the fact of poverty. If you don't have transportation how the hell do you evacuate? Just because you are poor does that make your life less valuable?
ItalianMuscle27 said:I just re-read the pole question.. and those poor people that lost everything, I just heard on the news that some of them are suing the city. What the f*ck for? How can you sue the city for something that happened from mother nature?? Its a shame they lost what they did but cmon already.. Sueing the city takes the cake.. Unfuckingbelievable..
bluepeter said:Something called levees. You know, the things that the city and state chintzed on for years? The things that subsequently broke and caused the death and devestation? Katrina herself as a natural disaster was bad but the damage was caused by negligence. Then again, America is the country where you can sue for the coffee being too hot or the instructions on your new RV about the cruise control not being clear enough.
I used to say the EXACT same thing to liberals bro. Don't you complain unless you are willing to give up what YOU have!Ludendorf said:this sounds like a budding socialist speech from an elitist californian
lol @ fight wealth consolidation, lenin felt the same way
you are the rich mofo on this thread, why don't you give your own money away to help these poor folks? don't volunteer my money away
bluepeter said:Something called levees. You know, the things that the city and state chintzed on for years? The things that subsequently broke and caused the death and devestation? Katrina herself as a natural disaster was bad but the damage was caused by negligence. Then again, America is the country where you can sue for the coffee being too hot or the instructions on your new RV about the cruise control not being clear enough.
ItalianMuscle27 said:Well if thats the case, I think Im going to sue my city/state for something than.. I dont know what, but Ill think of something.. Maybe sue mcdonalds for giving me cold food, ice in my coke, and a busted ketchup packet that got all over my clothes. I had an interview that afternoon.. assholes!
please show me where I talked about how much money I make or how well off I am? You're delusionala creed said:Lestat - why post something that you KNEW would divide this board - (well somewhat)
IMHO - you don't make THAT much $$$ - I'll easily match wages with you, but this is the first time i've brought this up.
I think you're cool and all, but i would like to see a poll/post question that doesn't end up with you letting everyone know how "well-off" you are (whether you do directly or indirectly) You're not wealthy enough to feel bad about how much you make.
Just my 2cents
he pwned himself by basically making shit up bro.pintoca said:OMGWTFBBQPWNEDOKTHXBYE
I completely disagree.Smurfy said:teachnically, the gov't should not have the right to force individual citizens to donate their own personal finances in any situation, IMO. plenty of people WILL, and CAN, and from a moral standpoint, yeah they SHOULD, but that should be up to the individual themselves.
as far as comparing the two horrible tragedies that occured, there is utterly no point at all in that. totally unproductive. and totally relative.
it was the worst in US history, not world history.Mr. dB said:"Worst Natural disaster in known History"???????
Please. The tsunami was worse. Hundreds of thousands died.
Or Krakatoa.
Lestat said:I completely disagree.
We are a society, and I think part of being a civilized nation is that we TAKE CARE OF OUR OWN.
Anytime someone uses welfare, food stamps, subsidized education loans, and other forms of assistance it is taking from people with means and giving it to those without and it turn makes this nation better for all.
ItalianMuscle27 said:Well if thats the case, I think Im going to sue my city/state for something than.. I dont know what, but Ill think of something.. Maybe sue mcdonalds for giving me cold food, ice in my coke, and a busted ketchup packet that got all over my clothes. I had an interview that afternoon.. assholes!
here's the facts of life bro.jnevin said:The welfare system and everything associated with it has been one of the worst things to happen to the poor in this country. It has caused generations to live in poverty instead of going out and working. People have become completely dependant upon the system to take care of them instead of using it as a temporary crutch.
Lestat said:here's the facts of life bro.
some people are fucking lazy, and will never do shit to help themselves (except maybe steal).
So we are going to end up paying for them one way or another. Do you want to pay for them in jail? or maybe do smoething to try to get them on their feet and productive?
At least wellfare money stays in the system. They use it to buy consumer goods, food, etc which means profits for businesses.
What is the alternative? create a bloated poor class where crime is rampant? that doesn't help your quality of life.
Lestat said:lmao. typical response.
you can't blame mother nature?
how about the levy engineers?
the poorest and oldest of people didn't have the means to leave though bro. Where would they have gone?ZKaudio said:I admit I'm not too up to date on katrina but...
didn't the news say, leave town there's a hurricane coming? Like 3 days before it hit... Levy or nature, there was still a warning that a dangerous condition would exist, regardless of crowding, there was still a reasonable ability to leave if one really wanted to... right?
on 9/11 the first hint they got that they needed to get out was "boom" which, for most, was wayy too late.
I'm sure someone will chime in here with some facts to squash my argument... but, this is my general take for a 3rd party onlooker's standpoint.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














