Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

USA 1 Wikileaks 0

Tough guy Assange only picks on safe western liberal countries.
i'd like to see him pull the same stunt with russia.
he'd get a dose of rat poison like alexander litvinenko, google the name
if you don't know about it.
there is a lot to despise about russia but i admire their balls (no homo)
 
Tough guy Assange only picks on safe western liberal countries.
i'd like to see him pull the same stunt with russia.
he'd get a dose of rat poison like alexander litvinenko, google the name
if you don't know about it.
there is a lot to despise about russia but i admire their balls (no homo)

You are correct. He will eventually be assassinated.
 
You are correct. He will eventually be assassinated.

meh, i don't want to see that though.
the rule of law should prevail, and if he broke laws,
which it appears he did by releasing classified shit,
then he should pay the prison cost.
 
Well, he goes after usa - cuz USA is all about getting their noses in every country's business. We also like fucking up world economies. Russia keeps to themselves.

c
 
yea they sure do keep to themselves!
signed,
poland, lithuania, ukraine, czech, eastern germany,
lativa, belarus, georgia...

We really should have a best-of thread for razorcookie spankage.
 
Gulf War 1, 1991 bor.

oh you mean the war that we paid for in money and blood to protect rich saudis whose sons later came back and killed 3,000 americans and took down two skyscrapers while we looked the other way and came up with lies to attack iraq instead. :)

that war right?

backdoorplunky: we like to fuck in waayyy more contries, many with oil or high gdp, than those 8. Ever wonder why al qaeda hates us and not the ruskies???

c
 
oh you mean the war that we paid for in money and blood to protect rich saudis whose sons later came back and killed 3,000 americans and took down two skyscrapers while we looked the other way and came up with lies to attack iraq instead. :)

that war right?

backdoorplunky: we like to fuck in waayyy more contries, many with oil or high gdp, than those 8. Ever wonder why al qaeda hates us and not the ruskies???

c

Yeah, because when we get attacked we engage in philosophical debates over whether to read them their Miranda rights whereas the ruskies would just blow them the hell up. I wouldn't mess with the russians either.
 
Yeah, because when we get attacked we engage in philosophical debates over whether to read them their Miranda rights whereas the ruskies would just blow them the hell up. I wouldn't mess with the russians either.

We have pussy hippies, russia doesn't. They got us there. Then again, everything else about russia sux tho. Try going there, esp if not white.

c
 
meh, i don't want to see that though.
the rule of law should prevail, and if he broke laws,
which it appears he did by releasing classified shit,
then he should pay the prison cost.

So, kill 15.000 people in Irak, i'm talking about civilian people...and 3.500 people in Afganisthan is inside American law...

God, thanks for be European...

The rule of law should prevail... AMEN. But should prevail over Australian citizens and over American Soldiers...

I like the USA and a lot of the ideas that the USA represent on the world, but I can't accept 20.000 people killed "by accident".
And soldiers laughing on AC-130... if America had the reason, with these things... loose it.
 
So, kill 15.000 people in Irak, i'm talking about civilian people...and 3.500 people in Afganisthan is inside American law...

God, thanks for be European...

The rule of law should prevail... AMEN. But should prevail over Australian citizens and over American Soldiers...

I like the USA and a lot of the ideas that the USA represent on the world, but I can't accept 20.000 people killed "by accident".
And soldiers laughing on AC-130... if America had the reason, with these things... loose it.

Using that logic, we should have never intervened in WWII either. How many German and Japanese civilians were killed by the US during that war?

You thank god for being a European now, but would you be doing so if you had to goose-step you way to the SS munitions factory every day to work?
 
So, kill 15.000 people in Irak, i'm talking about civilian people...and 3.500 people in Afganisthan is inside American law...

God, thanks for be European...

The rule of law should prevail... AMEN. But should prevail over Australian citizens and over American Soldiers...

I like the USA and a lot of the ideas that the USA represent on the world, but I can't accept 20.000 people killed "by accident".
And soldiers laughing on AC-130... if America had the reason, with these things... loose it.

knowing your nation's history with Arab colonizers, you sympathies do not surprise me
:rainbow:
 
These fabricated charges and gross violations of rights have made me lose the tiny shred of respect that I had left for the United States government. And Sweden...clearly the USA's bottom.
 
oh you mean the war that we paid for in money and blood to protect rich saudis whose sons later came back and killed 3,000 americans and took down two skyscrapers while we looked the other way and came up with lies to attack iraq instead. :)

that war right?
c

We can play 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon with all wars but the bottom line is we had the mission defined, executed the mission, accomplished the mission, then got the hell out and didnt break everything. Thats one we did right.
 
wikileaks exposing kenyan documents: Inside WikiLeaks? Leak Factory | Mother Jones

although the following are u.s. cables, they incriminate other nations, not the U.S.:

Russia: Russia armed South Ossetian, Abkhazian rebels - WikiLeaks | Russia | RIA Novosti

China: WikiLeaks: China 'would back one Korea run by South' - Telegraph

i can't click the links right now but i'll take your word for it...i've honestly only really heard about the cables that make the usa look like dutchbags.
but you appear to be correct, and i concede...he's still a faggot though
 
i can't click the links right now but i'll take your word for it...i've honestly only really heard about the cables that make the usa look like dutchbags.
but you appear to be correct, and i concede...he's still a faggot though

yea i hate him also and i'm glad he's getting pwned. i think if he had more stuff from other countries he'd post it. but he def has no problems with making other countries look bad
 
yea i hate him also and i'm glad he's getting pwned. i think if he had more stuff from other countries he'd post it. but he def has no problems with making other countries look bad

mad fascinating reading some of the cables though.
total fly on the wall experience...i've never actually gone to the site to read them, i don't want to click the link.
but they are posted up other places...reading some between
the yemen pres and the american ambassador.
way interesting
 
We can play 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon with all wars but the bottom line is we had the mission defined, executed the mission, accomplished the mission, then got the hell out and didnt break everything. Thats one we did right.

I'm glad I didn't die for a bunch of rich dictator saudis who don't want to fight for their freedoms. Unf. I did pay for it.

c
 
Big bro has no problem arresting peeps for leaking memos. Nude Xrays and colon massages to get on an airplane. Yea for democracy!

It's not nude Xray...it's a computer generated image. Entirely digital and calculated from analysis of the clothed image.

Let's be accurate in our paranoia.
 
It's not nude Xray...it's a computer generated image. Entirely digital and calculated from analysis of the clothed image.

Let's be accurate in our paranoia.

they can see your nipples, balls, tightey whiteys and ass crack. Sounds pretty naked to me.

c
 
they can see your nipples, balls, tightey whiteys and ass crack. Sounds pretty naked to me.

c

It's still not a photo of these areas. It's a computer calculating where they are and how big based on the bulges in your clothes.

They don't actually see your balls. Just an image of you with computer generated balls drawn in.
 
I'll be proud of him if he posts up how the lower and middle classes hve been fucked over by the rich in america for generations. And how voting and the two-party scam has been created to make the masses feel like they have power but they don't. How the gubment will fuck over every man, woman & child before it fucks over it's foreign debtors.

omfg, if he did that - he'd be assassinated overnight.

c
 
Odd how if he were publishing stolen credit card numbers, names of sexual assault victims or instructions for making nuclear weapons it would be a problem. But since it's stolen classified information from the US government, some people think it's fine.

He's a scumbag purveyor of espionage hiding as a member of the media.
 
Assange is a hero.

If he uncovered some massive wrongdoing I'd call him a hero.

But all he done is leak US documents pertaining to foreign policy practices that all governments are engaging in. Therefore his only purpose is to embarass and weaken the U.S.A.

He is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
 
They don't actually see your balls. Just an image of you with computer generated balls drawn in.
If we are going to get philosophical about it, jpg or video isn't your actually balls either. It's only pixels, not real balls! I guess in that case, I haven't seen Britney Spears flapjacks after all.

He's a scumbag purveyor of espionage hiding as a member of the media.
Did you feel the same way about Plame affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ? It's sad to see people so wrapped up in parties they don't see reality.

If wikileaks gave up nuke codes, or troop locations, or undercover names, I'd say that was BS. But things like Saudi Arabia trying to get us to assassinate Irans leader, that is called journalism.
 
If we are going to get philosophical about it, jpg or video isn't your actually balls either. It's only pixels, not real balls! I guess in that case, I haven't seen Britney Spears flapjacks after all.


Did you feel the same way about Plame affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ? It's sad to see people so wrapped up in parties they don't see reality.

If wikileaks gave up nuke codes, or troop locations, or undercover names, I'd say that was BS. But things like Saudi Arabia trying to get us to assassinate Irans leader, that is called journalism.

all the dirty work and heavy lifting of "diplomatic" deals gets done behind closed doors, in secrecy, under the condition of anonymity...open the doors, strip away the secrecy and eliminate the anonymity and the deals don't get done...and lots of actual innocent people suffer/die...you want the blood on your hands??? fine. have at it.

oh, and while we're at it...there will be no more protection of press sources...you tell a story?? you better tell where you got it or we'll jail you and beat it out of you...it's called journalism, holmes.
 
If we are going to get philosophical about it, jpg or video isn't your actually balls either. It's only pixels, not real balls! I guess in that case, I haven't seen Britney Spears flapjacks after all.


Did you feel the same way about Plame affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ? It's sad to see people so wrapped up in parties they don't see reality.

If wikileaks gave up nuke codes, or troop locations, or undercover names, I'd say that was BS. But things like Saudi Arabia trying to get us to assassinate Irans leader, that is called journalism.

Actually, I have been wrong and am guilty of spreading misinformation. The scanners actually do use technologies that penetrate the clothing and in some cases actually expose you to radiation:

Are Airport Scanners Safe? : NPR
 
all the dirty work and heavy lifting of "diplomatic" deals gets done behind closed doors, in secrecy, under the condition of anonymity...open the doors, strip away the secrecy and eliminate the anonymity and the deals don't get done...and lots of actual innocent people suffer/die...you want the blood on your hands??? fine. have at it.

oh, and while we're at it...there will be no more protection of press sources...you tell a story?? you better tell where you got it or we'll jail you and beat it out of you...it's called journalism, holmes.

I'll be honest, I don't understand a word of this. Are you speaking english?
 
I'll be proud of him if he posts up how the lower and middle classes hve been fucked over by the rich in america for generations. And how voting and the two-party scam has been created to make the masses feel like they have power but they don't. How the gubment will fuck over every man, woman & child before it fucks over it's foreign debtors.

omfg, if he did that - he'd be assassinated overnight.

c
And that would make him a hero / martyr.

Actually, change that. Much like the current leaks, all he would be telling us is stuff that we already suspect / know.
 
So, kill 15.000 people in Irak, i'm talking about civilian people...and 3.500 people in Afganisthan is inside American law...

God, thanks for be European...

The rule of law should prevail... AMEN. But should prevail over Australian citizens and over American Soldiers...

I like the USA and a lot of the ideas that the USA represent on the world, but I can't accept 20.000 people killed "by accident".
And soldiers laughing on AC-130... if America had the reason, with these things... loose it.
You already know that the world is not a nice place as it makes out to be and that people's lives are generally cheap (see soldiers killed, see causalities of war) compared to higher goals (see banking and military industrial complex), why are you surprised by it?
 
Fine fine, I will serve you, if you insist. Generally I won't reply unless it makes some kind of sense. I hate debating with people who can't form sentences.


all the dirty work and heavy lifting of "diplomatic" deals gets done behind closed doors, in secrecy, under the condition of anonymity
#1 If you REALLY want something secret, probably better to keep it off paper or screen.
#2 A lot of dirty diplomatic deals happen behind closed doors. I won't accept the rational that we should just bow our heads and accept that gov has our best interests at heart.

...and lots of actual innocent people suffer/die...you want the blood on your hands??? fine. have at it.
Jesus you are a drama queen. Are you kidding me with that? lolomgwtfbbq. Please come with SOME facts or logic and less fear mongering.

oh, and while we're at it...there will be no more protection of press sources...you tell a story?? you better tell where you got it or we'll jail you and beat it out of you...it's called journalism, holmes.
Now this is where you really lost me. What is this related to? I really don't understand what this is about. Are you saying we are going to pass a law to beat the sources out of journalists?
 
oh, and while we're at it...there will be no more protection of press sources...you tell a story?? you better tell where you got it or we'll jail you and beat it out of you...it's called journalism, holmes.

First of all, it's "homes" not "holmes".

Secondly, you're proposing a fascist police state there.
 
First of all, it's "homes" not "holmes".

Secondly, you're proposing a fascist police state there.

no...it's holmes...ask RW.

and...i wasn't proposing anything...i was being ironic...i figured you of all people would catch my drift...color me disappointed :whatever:
 
Fine fine, I will serve you, if you insist. Generally I won't reply unless it makes some kind of sense. I hate debating with people who can't form sentences.



#1 If you REALLY want something secret, probably better to keep it off paper or screen.
#2 A lot of dirty diplomatic deals happen behind closed doors. I won't accept the rational that we should just bow our heads and accept that gov has our best interests at heart.


Jesus you are a drama queen. Are you kidding me with that? lolomgwtfbbq. Please come with SOME facts or logic and less fear mongering.


Now this is where you really lost me. What is this related to? I really don't understand what this is about. Are you saying we are going to pass a law to beat the sources out of journalists?

at ease, sparky...just a little tgif chain-jerking...i don't know enough about any of this shit to have a real opinion...apparently you do, though :lmao:

oh and...the journalism comment?? meh, i was just being a smartass...no one is allowed to have any secrets...for any reason...well...except the fucking journalists.

government informants = bad

press informants = good

bit of a paradox, no?? and before you get all hostile again, no! i'm not saying that i don't believe in the first amendment...i'm merely poking fun at something that seems a little hypocritical to me, capiche??

one other thing...i don't think i'll be needing this tiara anymore...maybe it'll fit you...provided you're a size 8&3/4 :lmao:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom