Bonkme2
New member
Ok, so you can get creaine from red meat. What you are suggesting is that to maintain my "natural" status, I should no longer eat red meat. Or if I want to consume more of it than most people, I will no longer be "natural" because of the extra creatine I will be taking in. Or am I still misunderstanding?
The argument should no longer be about natural or not. If something occurs naturally in food or in our own bodies, how can you claim that it's not natural? The real argument should be whether someone obtained results from something legal or illegal like steroids.
And the term "supplements" are not only 1-AD and other prohormones. The term includes creatine, antioxidants, Avena Sativa to free up test, etc etc.
Those are hardly bad for you. And just because the FDA wants to ban something doesn't necessarily mean that it's bad for you. He who has the bigger wallet determines what laws are made. Take ephedra for example...
The argument should no longer be about natural or not. If something occurs naturally in food or in our own bodies, how can you claim that it's not natural? The real argument should be whether someone obtained results from something legal or illegal like steroids.
And the term "supplements" are not only 1-AD and other prohormones. The term includes creatine, antioxidants, Avena Sativa to free up test, etc etc.
Those are hardly bad for you. And just because the FDA wants to ban something doesn't necessarily mean that it's bad for you. He who has the bigger wallet determines what laws are made. Take ephedra for example...