Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

The Da Vinci code

The Da Vinci code: any good?

  • It's crap

    Votes: 7 33.3%
  • Below average

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Above average

    Votes: 12 57.1%
  • Awesome movie

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    21

anthrax

MVP
EF VIP
Any good?
 
i havent read the book, some parts didnt flow too well, like it was assumed the viewer could put it all together. I liked it thou. Im not a religious nut, prolly will walk out pissed if you are
 
SoKlueles said:
well i was interested in seeing it
but now im not so sure

tom hanks just invested in 51 percent of Klenex's share's.

he plans on doing lots of crying because he's so hurt.
 
It wasn't bad, you do need to read the book first. Went with a friend who hadn't read the book and was totally lost. The details are in the book, not the movie.
 
silverfish said:
It wasn't bad, you do need to read the book first. Went with a friend who hadn't read the book and was totally lost. The details are in the book, not the movie.

Thanks for that info!! I was sold on seeing the book but now I think I'll opt for the book and then see the movie when it comes out on video. I like all the details!!
 
No not going to see it. Why watch a movie that was spawned by Satan himself to further confuse the sheep so they will burn in hell.
 
curling said:
No not going to see it. Why watch a movie that was spawned by Satan himself to further confuse the sheep so they will burn in hell.


It is a movie that bashes Catholocism - thought you were protestant? If so, you should be happy and singing its praises.
 
mekannik said:
It is a movie that bashes Catholocism - thought you were protestant? If so, you should be happy and singing its praises.

While the book and movie does have some catholic bashing the main "controversy" has an impact on all of christianity. Christianity is based on the fact that jesus was the son of a god, a divine being, not just a prophet who had a family.

I had read the book a long time ago and then saw the movie last night. Personally I think seeing the movie first is a better idea than reading the book. If you read the book first you'll only be disappointed by the movie. Most people who don't like the movie had read the book first and realized how much was left out. I think people will like the book even more after seeing the movie because it will put things together a lot better.
 
crew9 said:
While the book and movie does have some catholic bashing the main "controversy" has an impact on all of christianity. Christianity is based on the fact that jesus was the son of a god, a divine being, not just a prophet who had a family.


Point taken with regards to the book bashing Catholicism mainly, christianity to some point.

But to curling's post - does this mean Ron Howard is Satan? or Akiva Goldsman and Dan Brown are? Or is it some unholy trinity?
 
crew9 said:
While the book and movie does have some catholic bashing the main "controversy" has an impact on all of christianity. Christianity is based on the fact that jesus was the son of a god, a divine being, not just a prophet who had a family.

Exactly. They can catholic bash all they want but don't say that Jesus wasn't the Son of God piece of shit hollyweird. And I used to like Tom Hanks always thought opie was a dork.
 
LOL at all the zealots trying to bash and suppress this movie. Wouldn't want an alternative viewpoint out there would we? Even more ironic that they are advocating stifling something in this manner when that is exactly the type of behaviour they are always decrying in the Islamic world.

Pathetic.
 
bluepeter said:
LOL at all the zealots trying to bash and suppress this movie. Wouldn't want an alternative viewpoint out there would we? Even more ironic that they are advocating stifling something in this manner when that is exactly the type of behaviour they are always decrying in the Islamic world.

Pathetic.

You could argue that true faith is having looked at all view points, especially those criticizing and denouncing your beliefs, and still believing.
 
crew9 said:
You could argue that true faith is having looked at all view points, especially those criticizing and denouncing your beliefs, and still believing.

Absolutely. Too bad most of the religious folk don't think that way.
 
bluepeter said:
LOL at all the zealots trying to bash and suppress this movie. Wouldn't want an alternative viewpoint out there would we? Even more ironic that they are advocating stifling something in this manner when that is exactly the type of behaviour they are always decrying in the Islamic world.

Pathetic.

It is not that I want to stiffle it but there are so many errors and out and out lies in the da vinci code that it is just crap because they say "Fact" even in the begginning of the movie I heard. So it decieves people into thinking that it is factually based when it is not. So the whole point of the movie to use false propaganda to steer people away from the only thing that will save their souls which is Christ dying for their sins.
 
curling said:
It is not that I want to stiffle it but there are so many errors and out and out lies in the da vinci code that it is just crap because they say "Fact" even in the begginning of the movie I heard. So it decieves people into thinking that it is factually based when it is not. So the whole point of the movie to use false propaganda to steer people away from the only thing that will save their souls which is Christ dying for their sins.

Really. And what about the current story of Christ is 'factual'? :FRlol: :FRlol: :FRlol:
 
curling said:
It is not that I want to stiffle it but there are so many errors and out and out lies in the da vinci code that it is just crap because they say "Fact" even in the begginning of the movie I heard. So it decieves people into thinking that it is factually based when it is not. So the whole point of the movie to use false propaganda to steer people away from the only thing that will save their souls which is Christ dying for their sins.

And P.S. - The Vatican issuing a directive that Christians should not see this movie is not trying to stifle it? Horseshit.
 
I personally thought it was a good movie, and I would certainly consider myself smarter and more well-rounded than 90% of the posters in this thread.

It's a long movie, but its almost all action packed so the viewer never gets bored. I have not read the book but I was able to piece everything together; perhaps this was due to my history channel endeavors.

Some of the events seem almost unbelievable. Tom Hanks and his photographic memory conveniently allow him to solve some of the more complex puzzles he's faced with - which is highly unlikely. Still a good movie none the less.
 
I'm a bit surprised to see Ron Howard and Tom Hanks making a movie that divides like this.

Persoanally, I think it is rediculous that people would let a book and a movie decide their faith. Sure it will have a short term impact...as do all well written ideas.
 
UA_Iron said:
I personally thought it was a good movie, and I would certainly consider myself smarter and more well-rounded than 90% of the posters in this thread.

It's a long movie, but its almost all action packed so the viewer never gets bored. I have not read the book but I was able to piece everything together; perhaps this was due to my history channel endeavors.

Some of the events seem almost unbelievable. Tom Hanks and his photographic memory conveniently allow him to solve some of the more complex puzzles he's faced with - which is highly unlikely. Still a good movie none the less.


It's a bit different in the book, as far as the puzzles go, and there are a lot more of them. Seeing things the way he did in the movie was a much better choice for Hollywood then some dude just sitting there thinking. The latter doesn't really make for an entertaining scene.
 
I enjoyed the movie
People need to stop being so closed minded about possibilities of change and the deciet in man. There is no evidence denouncing what the movie says.
and besides? who really gives a flying fuck if Jesus WAS a FATHER and A HUSBAND??? how does this is ANY way shape or form change his messages or his status as an enlightened and loving being who had a dramatic effect upon the world?? He was a man of flesh and blood, he simply was @ a enlightened level of concioussness that allowed him to influence and change much of the world(on par with Krishna and Bhudda).
I just am so lost as to how people could think that having a body or some type of blood lineage somehow has anything to do with spiritual evolvement. I hope jesus was a father and a husband. I would respect him even more then.
 
Top Bottom