Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

SwiftBoat Vet Exposed! LMAO!

WODIN

बुद्धकर&
Platinum
So this guy, Larry Turlow, who says that Kerry didn't deserve the Bronze Star for rescuing the marine dude also Got a Bronze Star for being involved in the same fire fight. LOL!!! What a dumb ass. The Post got his military records under the FOA.

Turlow even insinuates that Kerry had somehow altered his citation. LOL!!!

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...erry_war_critic

WASHINGTON - A Vietnam veteran who claims Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) lied about being under fire during a Mekong Delta engagement that won Kerry a Bronze Star was under constant fire himself during the same skirmish, according to the man's own medal citation, a newspaper reported.

The newly obtained records of Larry Thurlow show that he, like Kerry, won a Bronze Star in the engagement and that Thurlow's citation said he also was under attack, The Washington Post reported Thursday.

Thurlow, also like Kerry, commanded a Navy Swift boat during the Vietnam War. Thurlow swore in an affidavit last month that Kerry was "not under fire" when he rescued Lt. James Rassmann from the Bay Hap River.

Thurlow's records, obtained by the Post under the Freedom of Information Act, include references to "enemy small arms and automatic weapons fire" directed at all five boats in the flotilla that day. In his Bronze Star citation, Thurlow is praised for helping a damaged Swift boat "despite enemy bullets flying about him."

The records said Thurlow's actions "took place under constant enemy small arms fire," which Thurlow ignored in providing immediate assistance to the disabled boat and its crew.


Thurlow is a leading member of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, a public advocacy group of Vietnam veterans who have aired a television advertisement attacking Kerry's war record.

Kerry has described how his boat came under fire from the river banks after a mine explosion disabled another U.S. Swift boat. Kerry and members of his crew say the firing continued as Kerry leaned over to fish out Rassmann, who was blown overboard in another explosion.

Thurlow described Kerry's Bronze Star citation as "totally fabricated," saying "I never heard a shot."

Thurlow, a registered Republican, said he was angry with Kerry for his anti-war activities after his return to the United States, especially his claim that U.S. troops committed war crimes with the knowledge of their officers up the chain of command.

Thurlow told the Post that he got the award for helping to rescue the boat that was mined.

"This casts doubt on anybody's awards," he said. "It is sickening and disgusting."

He said he believed his own award would be "fraudulent" if it was based on coming under enemy fire.

"We weren't under fire," he insisted, speculating that Kerry could have been the source of at least some of the language used in the citation.

Thurlow said he lost his Bronze Star citation more than 20 years ago. He said he would not authorize release of his military records because he feared the Kerry campaign would discredit him.

Members of Kerry's crew have said Kerry is telling the truth. Rassmann said he has vivid memories of enemies firing at him from both banks.
 
Last edited:
He said he would not authorize release of his military records because he feared the Kerry campaign would discredit him.

By not releasing them he descredits himself. He doesnt want to be subjected to attacks, but he wants to attack someone else. :rolleyes:
 
AAP said:
what a typical republican hypocritical liar.

LOL @ everyones favorite married Cigar Stuffing Oval Office BJ gettin Dress Staining non lying DEMOCRATE..

How Typical is that ?
 
Y_Lifter said:
LOL @ everyones favorite married Cigar Stuffing Oval Office BJ gettin Dress Staining non lying DEMOCRATE..

How Typical is that ?
Wow...just yesterday you were using Clinton to Prop up Bush.

HA HA!!!
 
WODIN said:
Wow...just yesterday you were using Clinton to Prop up Bush. HA HA!!!

HO HO.. So what ?

Different situation Pops..
Should I hate/dislike someone due to one thing they do or did and not props them for something else if warranted ?

People keep dredging up the same old 4-5 dumb issues in this race instead of discussing the real issues and differences in policy agenda and belief..

So I though I would do the same and dredge up some silly mistake the Clinton
made that glares over all the good he did..

I was not using Clinton to prop up anyone. I was using him as an example of someone that actually deflected the silly issue of who went to vietnam and that not going makes one a bad leader or patriot..

Anyone can pull out silly news or political mud ads on both sides..
Neither side is innocent of not throwing the first mud over the last 20 years.

Wanna impress me ? Post up real idealogical or Political or Social issues and differences between the candidates instead of what their Campaign managers put out..

I'm Y lifter and I approve this message
 
Y_Lifter said:
HO HO.. So what ?

Different situation Pops..
Should I hate/dislike someone due to one thing they do or did and not props them for something else if warranted ?

People keep dredging up the same old 4-5 dumb issues in this race instead of discussing the real issues and differences in policy agenda and belief..

So I though I would do the same and dredge up some silly mistake the Clinton
made that glares over all the good he did..

I was not using Clinton to prop up anyone. I was using him as an example of someone that actually deflected the silly issue of who went to vietnam and that not going makes one a bad leader or patriot..

Anyone can pull out silly news or political mud ads on both sides..
Neither side is innocent of not throwing the first mud over the last 20 years.

Wanna impress me ? Post up real idealogical or Political or Social issues and differences between the candidates instead of what their Campaign managers put out..

I'm Y lifter and I approve this message
You sure are being quite the FLIP FLOPER!!! here.
 
WODIN said:
You sure are being quite the FLIP FLOPER!!! here.

Wrong..
One thing you have never heard me bash Kerry or the Dems on is changing
position on "details" of an agenda depending on public opinion or situation.

Changing ones entire philisophical character is entirely different and that would be what I would call a Flip Flop.
AKA A Fair Weather fan of what's popular, vs being a fan even when your agenda is losing..
 
Top Bottom