Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below sh4dowf4lcon
New member
He was there, maybe he knows something you don't? Maybe Kerry was crying?
SwiftBoat Vet Exposed! LMAO!
- Thread starter WODIN
- Start date
G
Gambino
Guest
Y_Lifter said:
word to mutha...
S
Spartacus
Guest
THE PROBLEM with being an opportunist is that you can easily forget what you've recently said.
On Monday, during a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, President Bush announced that he intends to modify the configuration of American forces in both South Korea and Europe. On Wednesday, Sen. Kerry, speaking before the same audience, sharply criticized the president's decision.
Appearing on ABC's This Week on August 1, however, Sen. Kerry responded to a question by host George Stephanopoulos on Iraq. Stephanopoulos asked Kerry whether, as president, he could "promise that American troops will be home by the end of your first term?" Kerry's answer:
I will have significant, enormous reduction in the level of troops. . . . I think we can significantly change the deployment of troops, not just there but elsewhere in the world. In the Korean peninsula perhaps, in Europe perhaps. There are great possibilities open to us. But this administration has very little imagination.
Apparently, Sen. Kerry wanted to appeal to the "get-the-boys-back-home" sentiment in the country when he spoke on This Week. Yesterday, addressing a convention of veterans, Kerry was busy burnishing his credentials as a hawk by suggesting that cutting our forces in Korea "is clearly the wrong signal to send" at this time.
Who knows what Sen. Kerry believes? Does Sen. Kerry even know?
On Monday, during a speech to the Veterans of Foreign Wars, President Bush announced that he intends to modify the configuration of American forces in both South Korea and Europe. On Wednesday, Sen. Kerry, speaking before the same audience, sharply criticized the president's decision.
Appearing on ABC's This Week on August 1, however, Sen. Kerry responded to a question by host George Stephanopoulos on Iraq. Stephanopoulos asked Kerry whether, as president, he could "promise that American troops will be home by the end of your first term?" Kerry's answer:
I will have significant, enormous reduction in the level of troops. . . . I think we can significantly change the deployment of troops, not just there but elsewhere in the world. In the Korean peninsula perhaps, in Europe perhaps. There are great possibilities open to us. But this administration has very little imagination.
Apparently, Sen. Kerry wanted to appeal to the "get-the-boys-back-home" sentiment in the country when he spoke on This Week. Yesterday, addressing a convention of veterans, Kerry was busy burnishing his credentials as a hawk by suggesting that cutting our forces in Korea "is clearly the wrong signal to send" at this time.
Who knows what Sen. Kerry believes? Does Sen. Kerry even know?
p0ink
New member
they were not 'under fire' for which a bronze star is awarded. they hit a mine.
hitting a mine does not equal being under fire.
secondly, he did not file for a bronze star, a CO did.
isn't it odd, that the person who fell out of the boat was not even on the boat that hit the mine, but he was in kerry's boat, which was also the only boat to speed off and leave.
hitting a mine does not equal being under fire.
secondly, he did not file for a bronze star, a CO did.
isn't it odd, that the person who fell out of the boat was not even on the boat that hit the mine, but he was in kerry's boat, which was also the only boat to speed off and leave.
Similar threads
